Qianjun Xu

Prof. Dr. Qianjun Xu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2019 in Construction and Building Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJiarong Shen
Jiarong Shen
QXQianjun Xu
Qianjun Xu

1 December 2019 in Construction and Building Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJiarong Shen
Jiarong Shen
QXQianjun Xu
Qianjun Xu

17 February 2010 in Landslides
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
QXQianjun Xu
Qianjun Xu
LZLimin Zhang
Limin Zhang

1 April 2016 in International Journal of Geomechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BMBalati Maihemuti
Balati Maihemuti
WEWang Enzhi
Wang Enzhi
THTumaerbai Hudan
Tumaerbai Hudan
QXQianjun Xu
Qianjun Xu
The fluctuations of reservoir water levels significantly change the hydrogeological conditions of reservoir banks and thus affect the steady state of the bank slope. Reservoir landslide stability is governed by the complex interactions between the rock and the water (both reservoir and pore water). This paper establishes the constitutive coupled model of seepage and stress field for the E20 bank slope in the Haizhou Open Pit Coal Mine hydropower station’s lower reservoir. Using the geotechnical engineering three-dimensional fast Lagrangian analysis of continua (FLAC-3D 4.0) program as a computational analysis tool, the E20 bank slope deformation mechanism was analyzed. The simulation model, calculated by using the Boit consolidation and pore-water continuity principles, was built using FEMs. The numerical simulation results showed that cyclical fluctuations and speeds of the reservoir’s water level affect its bank slope stability. When the water level drops at a speed of 12 m/day, the simulation...

16 November 2020 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DYDuohao Yin
Duohao Yin
QXQianjun Xu
Qianjun Xu
Non-destructive testing (NDT) methods are an important means to detect and assess rock damage. To better understand the accuracy of NDT methods for measuring damage in sandstone, this study compared three NDT methods, including ultrasonic testing, electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) testing, computed tomography (CT) scan testing, and a destructive test method, elastic modulus testing. Sandstone specimens were subjected to different levels of damage through cyclic loading and different damage variables derived from five different measured parameters—longitudinal wave (P-wave) velocity, first wave amplitude attenuation, resistivity, effective bearing area and the elastic modulus—were compared. The results show that the NDT methods all reflect the damage levels for sandstone accurately. The damage variable derived from the P-wave velocity is more consistent with the other damage variables, and the amplitude attenuation is more sensitive to damage. The damage variable derived from the effective bearing area is smaller than that derived from the other NDT measurement parameters. Resistivity provides a more stable measure of damage, and damage derived from the acoustic parameters is less stable. By developing P-wave velocity-to-resistivity models based on theoretical and empirical relationships, it was found that differences between these two damage parameters can be explained by differences between the mechanisms through which they respond to porosity, since the resistivity reflect pore structure, while the P-wave velocity reflects the extent of the continuous medium within the sandstone.

1 January 2001 in Mechanics Research Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JZJianhong Zhang
Jianhong Zhang
QXQianjun Xu
Qianjun Xu
ZCZuyu Chen
Zuyu Chen