Leishmaniasis is a neglected tropical disease with two main clinical forms: cutaneous and visceral leishmaniasis. Diagnosis of leishmaniasis is still a challenge, concerning the detection and correct identification of the species of the parasite, mainly in endemic areas where the absence of appropriate resources is still a problem. Most accessible methods for diagnosis, particularly in these areas, do not include the identification of each one of more than 20 species responsible for the disease. Here, we summarize the main methods used for the detection and identification of leishmaniasis that can be performed by demonstration of the parasite in biological samples from the patient through microscopic examination, by in vitro culture or animal inoculation; by molecular methods through the detection of parasite DNA; or by immunological methods through the detection of parasite antigens that may be present in urine or through the detection of specific antibodies against the parasite. Potential new methods that can be applied for laboratory diagnosis of leishmaniasis are also discussed.

Paromomycin is an aminoglycoside antibiotic approved in 2006 for the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania donovani in Southeast Asia. Although this drug is not approved for the treatment of visceral and cutaneous leishmaniasis in Brazil, it is urgent and necessary to evaluate the potential of this drug as alternative for the treatment against species responsible for these clinical forms of the disease. In Brazil, Leishmania amazonensis is responsible for cutaneous and diffuse cutaneous leishmaniasis. The diffuse cutaneous form of the disease is difficult to treat and frequent relapses are reported, mainly when the treatment is interrupted. Here, we evaluated paromomycin susceptibility in vitro of a L. amazonensis clinical isolate from a patient with cutaneous leishmaniasis and the reference strain L. amazonensis M2269, as well as its in vivo efficacy in a murine experimental model. Although never exposed to paromomycin, a significant differential susceptibility between these two lines was found. Paromomycin was highly active in vitro against the clinical isolate in both forms of the parasite, while its activity against the reference strain was less active. In vivo studies in mice infected with each one of these lines demonstrated that paromomycin reduces lesion size and parasite burden and a direct correlation between the susceptibility in vitro and the effectiveness of this drug in vivo was found. Our findings indicate that paromomycin efficacy in vivo is dependent on intrinsic susceptibility of the parasite. Beyond that, this study contributes for the evaluation of the potential use of paromomycin in chemotherapy of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Brazil caused by L. amazonensis.

The parasitic protozoan Leishmania (Leishmania) infantum is the etiological agent of human visceral leishmaniasis in South America, an infectious disease associated with malnutrition, anemia, and hepatosplenomegaly. In Brazil alone, around 2700 cases are reported each year. Treatment failure can occur as a result of drug, host, and/or parasite-related factors. Here, we isolated a Leishmania species from a pediatric patient with visceral leishmaniasis that did not respond to chemotherapy, experiencing a total of nine therapeutic relapses and undergoing a splenectomy. The parasite was confirmed as L. (L.) infantum after sequencing of the ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer, and the clinical isolate, in both promastigote and amastigote forms, was submitted to in vitro susceptibility assays with all the drugs currently used in the chemotherapy of leishmaniasis. The isolate was susceptible to meglumine antimoniate, amphotericin B, pentamidine, miltefosine, and paromomycin, similarly to another strain of this species that had previously been characterized. These findings indicate that the multiples relapses observed in this pediatric patient were not due to a decrease in the drug susceptibility of this isolate; therefore, immunophysiological aspects of the patient should be further investigated to understand the basis of treatment failure in this case.

In South America, cutaneous leishmaniasis is caused by several species of the parasite of the genus Leishmania. Here, we describe an imported case of cutaneous leishmaniasis acquired in Peru by a Brazilian patient during her travel to Iquitos. Infection by Leishmania parasites was confirmed by histopathologic examination, and the patient was treated with pentavalent antimony (Pentostam), without clinical response. Molecular typing was performed by sequencing the ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer and heat-shock protein 70 gene, which identified the parasites as Leishmania guyanensis. The clinical isolate was similarly susceptible to amphotericin B, pentamidine, and miltefosine as the reference strain, while for pentavalent antimony, this clinical isolate was more susceptible than the reference strain, even though its susceptibility in vitro was still considered low. The patient was then treated with liposomal amphotericin B, with clinical improvement of the lesions.

In Brazil, cutaneous leishmaniasis is endemic and may be caused by Leishmania amazonensis. This species is the second most prevalent species in that country, and it is responsible for localized cutaneous and diffuse cutaneous leishmaniasis. Pentavalent antimony is still the first-line drug for cutaneous leishmaniasis treatment in Brazil. In this study, we investigated the in vitro susceptibility to antimony of a panel of L. amazonensis strains and clinical isolates responsible for cutaneous and diffuse cutaneous leishmaniasis. There was a significant variation in susceptibility to antimony not only within these strains and isolates evaluated at either promastigote or intracellular amastigote stages, but also between the two parasite stages for some of these strains and isolates. Additionally, we investigated whether this in vitro susceptibility variation to antimony would affect the in vivo response to treatment, using an experimental BALB/c mouse model of cutaneous leishmaniasis infected with three strains differing in susceptibility. Despite antimony could mildly reduce the lesion size in mice infected with one of these strains, no significant reduction in the parasite burden was found in treated animals, and they were completely refractory to drug treatment. These findings indicate that antimony treatment, even at high dosages via the intraperitoneal route, was not effective against L. amazonensis infection in this animal model. Finally, this study provides a preclinical dataset of the activity of antimony against a panel of strains and isolates of a species responsible for localized cutaneous and diffuse cutaneous leishmaniasis in Brazil.