Leishmaniasis is a neglected tropical disease with two main clinical forms: cutaneous and visceral leishmaniasis. Diagnosis of leishmaniasis is still a challenge, concerning the detection and correct identification of the species of the parasite, mainly in endemic areas where the absence of appropriate resources is still a problem. Most accessible methods for diagnosis, particularly in these areas, do not include the identification of each one of more than 20 species responsible for the disease. Here, we summarize the main methods used for the detection and identification of leishmaniasis that can be performed by demonstration of the parasite in biological samples from the patient through microscopic examination, by in vitro culture or animal inoculation; by molecular methods through the detection of parasite DNA; or by immunological methods through the detection of parasite antigens that may be present in urine or through the detection of specific antibodies against the parasite. Potential new methods that can be applied for laboratory diagnosis of leishmaniasis are also discussed.

Leishmaniasis chemotherapy remains very challenging. The high cost of active drugs, along with the severity of their side effects and the increasing failure rate of the current therapeutic schemes, calls for the discovery of new active drugs and schemes of treatment. The use of combination therapy has gained much attention in recent years as a possible strategy for overcoming the various shortcomings in the present arsenal. We recently described the effectiveness of tamoxifen in murine models of leishmaniasis, and here, we investigated the interactions between tamoxifen and amphotericin B, one of the most potent drugs used in leishmaniasis treatment. Thein vitrointeractions were indifferent for the association of tamoxifen and amphotericin B. The association was also assayedin vivoinLeishmania amazonensis-infected BALB/c mice and was found to yield at least additive effects at low doses of both drugs.