George K. Symeon

Dr. George K. Symeon

Research Institute of Animal Science, ELGO-DEMETER, Giannitsá, Kentrikí Makedonía, Greece
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 January 2025 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
George K. SymeonGeorge K. Symeon
George K. Symeon
KAKonstantina Akamati
Konstantina Akamati
Vassilios DotasVassilios Dotas
Vassilios Dotas
DKDespoina Karatosidi
Despoina Karatosidi
BIBizelis Iosif
Bizelis Iosif
GLGEORGE P. LALIOTIS
GEORGE P. LALIOTIS
Climate change is a contemporary global challenge that requires comprehensive solutions to mitigate its adverse effects. All human activities contribute to climate change, mainly through atmospheric emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs), such as nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), and methane (CH4). While most of these emissions are primarily due to fossil fuel use, agriculture and livestock production also contribute to a significant share of approximately 12% of global emissions. Most processes that are implemented within an animal husbandry unit are associated with greenhouse gas emissions, including manure management. This review explores the interconnection between climate change and manure management practices, highlighting the potential for sustainable approaches to mitigating GHG emissions. The key strategies for manure management, such as anaerobic digestion, nutrient management, composting, manure separation and treatment, and improved storage and handling, are discussed, as they are implemented in different livestock production systems (ruminants, poultry, and pigs). Despite the technological progress, there is still a place for further improving manure management approaches, especially in non-ruminant species leading to a higher mitigation potential and a reduction in greenhouse gases emissions. Moreover, policy support and incentives for sustainable practices are crucial for widespread adoption.

28 October 2015 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MGMichael Goliomytis
Michael Goliomytis
NKNikos Kartsonas
Nikos Kartsonas
MCMaria A Charismiadou
Maria A Charismiadou
George K. SymeonGeorge K. Symeon
George K. Symeon
PSPanagiotis E Simitzis
Panagiotis E Simitzis
SDStelios G Deligeorgis
Stelios G Deligeorgis
An experiment was conducted to examine the effects of supplementing broiler feed with hesperidin or naringin, on growth performance, carcass characteristics, breast meat quality and the oxidative stability of breast and thigh meat. Two hundred and forty 1-day-old Ross 308 broiler chickens were randomly assigned to 6 groups. One of the groups served as a control (C) and was given commercial basal diets, whereas the other five groups were given the same diets further supplemented with naringin at 0.75 g/kg (N1), naringin at 1.5 g/kg (N2), hesperidin at 0.75 g/kg (E1), hesperidin at 1.5 g/kg (E2) and a-tocopheryl acetate at 0.2 g/kg (E). At 42 days of age, 10 chickens per treatment group were slaughtered for meat quality and oxidative stability assessment. No significant differences were observed among groups in final body weight, carcass weight and internal organs weights (P>0.05) apart from liver that decreased linearly with increased levels of naringin (P-linear<0.05). Regarding the breast meat quality parameters, only redness (a*) value was higher in E1 and N1 group compared to VE group (P0.05). Measurement of lipid oxidation values showed that after hesperidin and naringin dietary supplementation, malondialdehyde values decreased in tissue samples in a dose depended manner (P-linear<0.05). In conclusion, hesperidin and naringin, positively influence meat antioxidative properties without negative implications on growth performance and meat quality characteristics in poultry, thus appearing as important additives for both the consumer and the industry.

1 July 2010 in Poultry Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
George K. SymeonGeorge K. Symeon
George K. Symeon
FMF. Mantis
F. Mantis
BIBizelis Iosif
Bizelis Iosif
AKA. Kominakis
A. Kominakis
ERE. Rogdakis
E. Rogdakis
A 2-trial experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of caponization on growth performance, carcass composition, and meat quality of medium gro

1 April 2010 in Meat Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PSP.E. Simitzis
P.E. Simitzis
George K. SymeonGeorge K. Symeon
George K. Symeon
MCM.A. Charismiadou
M.A. Charismiadou
JBJ.A. Bizelis
J.A. Bizelis
SDS.G. Deligeorgis
S.G. Deligeorgis

14 March 2024 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Sofiane BOUDALIASofiane BOUDALIA
Sofiane BOUDALIA
SSSamir SMETI
Samir SMETI
MTMahilet Dawit Teweldebirhan
Mahilet Dawit Teweldebirhan
EKEwonetu Kebede
Ewonetu Kebede
YGYassine Gueroui
Yassine Gueroui
George K. SymeonGeorge K. Symeon
George K. Symeon
Small ruminants, such as sheep (Ovisaries) and goats (Capra hircus), contribute to approximately 475 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MtCO2e) greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, accounting for approximately 6.5% of the global emissions in the agriculture sector. Crop residues, silage, grasses, hay, browse, plant leaves, shrubs, agro-industrial by-products, poultry litter, and other alternative feed sources are frequently utilized for small ruminant production. The use of these valuable alternative feeds can significantly improve animal productivity and reduce carbon footprints and GHG fluxes, making it both environmentally friendly and cost-effective. Additionally, these alternative feeds possess antioxidant, antimicrobial, and antiseptic properties that can enhance the quality of the meat and milk produced. By impacting the bacteria involved in ruminal biohydrogenation, alternative feeds can reduce methane emissions and contribute to a decrease in the carbon footprint. Overall, the use of alternative feed sources for small ruminants generally improves their apparent nutrient digestibility and productivity, and has an impact on the production of greenhouse gases, especially methane. Finally, this review recommends evaluating the economic analysis of reducing methane emissions in small ruminants by utilizing different feed sources and feeding techniques.

1 June 2011 in Canadian Journal of Animal Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PSP. E. Simitzis
P. E. Simitzis
George K. SymeonGeorge K. Symeon
George K. Symeon
MCM. A. Charismiadou
M. A. Charismiadou
AAA. G. Ayoutanti
A. G. Ayoutanti
SDS. G. Deligeorgis
S. G. Deligeorgis
Simitzis, P. E., Symeon, G. K., Charismiadou, M. A., Ayoutanti, A. G. and Deligeorgis, S. G. 2011. The effects of dietary hesperidin supplementation on broiler performance and chicken meat characteristics. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 91: 275–282. An experiment was conducted to examine the effects of supplementing broiler feed with hesperidin, a bioflavonoid that is an abundant and inexpensive by-product of citrus cultivation, on growth performance, carcass characteristics, breast meat quality characteristics and the oxidative stability of breast meat. Eighty 308-d-old Ross male broiler chickens were randomly assigned to four groups. One of the groups served as a control (C) and was given commercial basal diets, whereas the other three groups were given the same diets further supplemented with hesperidin at 1.5 g kg−1(HE1), or hesperidin at 3.0 g kg−1(HE2), or α-tocopheryl acetate at 0.2 g kg−1(VE). At 40 d of age, broilers were fasted for 12 h, weighed and slaughtered. After overnight chilling, carcasses were trimmed for breast fillets by removing skin, bones and connective tissue. The right pectoralis major muscle was used for quality parameters estimation, whereas the left pectoralis major muscle for lipid oxidation measurements. No significant differences were observed after dietary hesperidin or α-tocopheryl acetate supplementation in final body weight (kg), body weight gain (g), feed conversion rate and internal organs weight (g). Shear values (N mm−2), intramuscular fat (%) and cooking loss (%) were also not significantly influenced by the dietary treatments. Significant differences were found concerning pH24and color parameter values among the treatment groups. Measurement of lipid oxidation values showed that as hesperidin increased in the diet, malondialdehyde values decreased in tissue samples, suggesting that hesperidin particularly at 3 g kg−1exerted an antioxidant effect on chicken tissues (P<0.01). However, dietary α-tocopheryl acetate supplementation at 0.2 g kg−1of feed displayed greater antioxidant activity than hesperidin at either supplementation rate (P<0.01). In conclusion, hesperidin, an abundant component of citrus pulp, positively influences meat antioxidative properties without negative implications on growth performance and meat quality characteristics in poultry, thus appearing to be an important additive for both the consumer and the industry.