Oleg Marchenko

Dr. Oleg Marchenko

Melentiev Energy Systems Institute of Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2015 in International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Oleg MarchenkoOleg Marchenko
Oleg Marchenko
Sergei SolominSergei Solomin
Sergei Solomin

2 March 2017 in International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Oleg MarchenkoOleg Marchenko
Oleg Marchenko
Sergei SolominSergei Solomin
Sergei Solomin

1 January 2002
Verified
Book
Closed access
LBLev S. Belyaev
Lev S. Belyaev
Oleg MarchenkoOleg Marchenko
Oleg Marchenko
SFSergei P. Filippov
Sergei P. Filippov
Sergei SolominSergei Solomin
Sergei Solomin
TSTatyana B. Stepanova
Tatyana B. Stepanova
AKAlexei L. Kokorin
Alexei L. Kokorin

1 July 2018 in International Journal of Thermal Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Oleg MarchenkoOleg Marchenko
Oleg Marchenko

16 August 2010 in International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Oleg MarchenkoOleg Marchenko
Oleg Marchenko
A mathematical model has been developed to describe an autonomous energy system including energy plants (technologies) of two types: energy conversion (transport) and energy (energy carriers) storage. At the conversion plants, primary and secondary energy is converted into final energy and secondary energy of another type; in energy storages, secondary energy is accumulated for its further utilization. The mathematical programming problem is formulated; the objective function is the total discounted costs of the system creation and operation. The variants of the optimal structure of an energy system, including a diesel power plant, a biomass-fueled power plant and wind turbines, were found, depending on the price of diesel fuel and wind speed.

28 October 2020 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Oleg MarchenkoOleg Marchenko
Oleg Marchenko
Sergei SolominSergei Solomin
Sergei Solomin
AKAlexander Kozlov
Alexander Kozlov
VSVitaly Shamanskiy
Vitaly Shamanskiy
Igor DonskoyIgor Donskoy
Igor Donskoy
The aim of this work is to assess the effectiveness of biomass gasification power plants in Russia (Irkutsk region) and compare them with other types of electricity and heat cogeneration systems. Biomass, which is waste from logging and wood processing, is considered as fuel for gasification plants. As a criterion, the cost of energy is used. Analytical relations are obtained for the cost of electric energy at a given cost of thermal energy and vice versa, thermal energy at a given cost of electric energy. These relationships are applied to assess the economic efficiency and compare small-power plants (up to 200–500 kW) such as mini-combined heat and power (CHP) on fuel chips and fuel pellets, coal-fired CHP and gas and liquid fuel power plants (gas-piston and diesel power plants). The latter are equipped with heat recovery boilers and supply consumers with heat and the electric power simultaneously. The calculation results show that the cost of electricity when using wood fuel is significantly less than the cost of electricity from a diesel power plant due to the use of cheaper fuel. In this regard, for autonomous energy systems of small power, especially near logging points, energy supply from biomass gasification power plants is a preferable solution than the use of diesel power plants. Wood fired energy cogeneration systems (mini-CHP) can also successfully compete with coal and gas power plants if they have cheap wood fuel at their location. With the introduction of carbon dioxide emissions charges, the use of not only wood chips, but also pellets becomes competitive in comparison with coal and gas.