Ka Ryeong Bae

Dr. Ka Ryeong Bae

Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences & Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 April 2021 in Psycho-Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SSSungkeun Shim
Sungkeun Shim
DKDanbee Kang
Danbee Kang
KBKa Ryeong Bae
Ka Ryeong Bae
WLWoo Yong Lee
Woo Yong Lee
SNSeok Jin Nam
Seok Jin Nam
JCJuhee Cho
Juhee Cho

1 January 2016 in Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SKSun Young Kwon
Sun Young Kwon
KBKa Ryeong Bae
Ka Ryeong Bae
Kwon SY, et al. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2016 Feb;46(1):50-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2016.46.1.50

1 January 2023 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KBKa Ryeong Bae
Ka Ryeong Bae
WSWi-Young So
Wi-Young So
Seyong JangSeyong Jang
Seyong Jang
Background: This study aimed to enhance post-traumatic growth in young breast cancer patients by providing them with self-disclosure and social support resources, to reduce intrusive rumination and increase deliberate rumination. This study was conducted at a university-based cancer center in Seoul, South Korea. The study included a four-week group-based psychoeducational program, which supported the post-traumatic personal growth of breast cancer patients. The primary outcome was increased post-traumatic growth, and the secondary outcomes were rumination, distress, and traumatic perception. Methods: The study included 38 young breast cancer patients, with a mean age of 42.21 years and mean time since diagnosis of 13.84 months. Results: Results of the study revealed statistically significant improvements in total post-traumatic growth and all subdomains, after the intervention (p < 0.001) and one month later (p < 0.001), as compared to the baseline. A significant improvement was also observed in deliberate rumination after the intervention (p = 0.038). Furthermore, the patients had a statistically significant decrease in anxiety, after the intervention (p = 0.035) and one month later (p = 0.005), as compared to the baseline. Conclusions: Overall, the program encourages activities that promote post-traumatic growth, enabling young breast cancer patients to return to their normal lives. Specifically, the growth allows patients to return to work and maintain a healthy body and mind. The results of this study indicate that this program can be used as an effective psychological intervention for young breast cancer patients.

1 January 2014 in Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SJSo Yeun Jun
So Yeun Jun
IKIl Sun Ko
Il Sun Ko
KBKa Ryeong Bae
Ka Ryeong Bae
Jun SY, et al. J Korean Acad Nurs Adm. 2014 Jun;20(3):342-352. http://dx.doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2014.20.3.342

15 April 2023 in Cancer Research and Treatment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DKDanbee Kang
Danbee Kang
KBKa Ryeong Bae
Ka Ryeong Bae
YAYeojin Ahn
Yeojin Ahn
NKNayeon Kim
Nayeon Kim
SNSeok Jin Nam
Seok Jin Nam
JCJuhee Cho
Juhee Cho
Purpose We developed a comprehensive return to work (RTW) intervention covering physical, psycho-social and practical issues for patients newly diagnosed and evaluated its efficacy in terms of RTW.Materials and Methods A multi-center randomized controlled trial was done to evaluate the efficacy of the intervention conducted at two university-based cancer centers in Korea. The intervention program comprised educational material at diagnosis, a face-to-face educational session at completion of active treatment, and three individualized telephone counseling sessions. The control group received other education at enrollment.Results At 1-month post-intervention (T2), the intervention group was more likely to be working compared to the control group after controlling working status at diagnosis (65.4% vs. 55.9%, p=0.037). Among patients who did not work at baseline, the intervention group was 1.99-times more likely to be working at T2. The mean of knowledge score was higher in the intervention group compared to the control group (7.4 vs. 6.8, p=0.029). At the 1-year follow-up, the intervention group was 65% (95% confidence interval, 0.78 to 3.48) more likely to have higher odds for having work.Conclusion The intervention improved work-related knowledge and was effective in facilitating cancer patients’ RTW.

1 January 2017 in Asian Oncology Nursing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KBKa Ryeong Bae
Ka Ryeong Bae
YIYoung Soon Im
Young Soon Im
GNGie-Ok Noh
Gie-Ok Noh
YSYoojung Son
Yoojung Son
HSHan Gil Seo
Han Gil Seo
Bae KR, et al. Asian Oncol Nurs. 2017 Dec;17(4):213-219. https://doi.org/10.5388/aon.2017.17.4.213