Local stimulation induces generation and propagation of electrical signals, including the variation potential (VP) and action potential, in plants. Burning-induced VP changes the physiological state of plants; specifically, it inactivates photosynthesis. However, the mechanisms that decrease photosynthesis are poorly understood. We investigated these mechanisms by measuring VP-connected systemic changes in CO2 assimilation, parameters of light reactions of photosynthesis, electrochromic pigment absorbance shifts, and light scattering. We reveal that inactivation of photosynthesis in the pea, including inactivation of dark and light reactions, was connected with the VP. Inactivation of dark reactions decreased the rate constant of the fast relaxation of the electrochromic pigment absorbance shift, which reflected a decrease in the H+-ATP synthase activity. This decrease likely contributed to the acidification of the chloroplast lumen, which developed after VP induction. However, VP-connected decrease of the proton motive force across the thylakoid membrane, possibly, reflected a decreased pH in the stroma. This decrease may be another mechanism of chloroplast lumen acidification. Overall, stroma acidification can decrease electron flow through photosystem I, and lumen acidification induces growth of fluorescence non-photochemical quenching and decreases electron flow through photosystem II, i.e., pH decreases in the stroma and lumen, possibly, contribute to the VP-induced inactivation of light reactions of photosynthesis.

Cyclic electron flow is an important component of the total photosynthetic electron flow and participates in adaptation to the action of stressors. Local leaf stimulation induces electrical signals, including variation potential (VP), which inactivate photosynthesis; however, their influence on cyclic electron flow has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate VP’s influence on cyclic electron flow in pea (Pisum sativum L.). VP was induced in pea seedling leaves by local heating and measured in an adjacent, undamaged leaf by extracellular electrodes. CO2 assimilation was measured using a portable gas exchange measuring system. Photosystem I and II parameters were investigated using a measuring system for simultaneous assessment of P700 oxidation and chlorophyll fluorescence. Heating-induced VP reduced CO2 assimilation and electron flow through photosystem II. In response, cyclic electron flow rapidly decreased and subsequently slowly increased. Slow increases in cyclic flow were caused by decreased electron flow through photosystem II, which was mainly connected with VP-induced photosynthetic dark stage inactivation. However, direct influence by VP on photosystem I also participated in activation of cyclic electron flow. Thus, VP, induced by local leaf-heating, activated cyclic electron flow in undamaged leaves. This response was similar to photosynthetic changes observed under the action of direct stressors. Possible mechanisms of VP’s influence on cyclic flow were discussed.

Local burning of a leaf induces a unique electrical signal in plants: variation potential (VP), which can cause numerous functional responses, including changes in photosynthesis. The influences of VP on damage to photosynthetic machinery and thermal resistance of whole plant with heating were investigated in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Under high external temperature (53°C), VP induction was found to cause accelerated initial lowering of photosynthetic parameters, reduced transpiration rate, decreased PSI damage, and increased PSII damage. Increased PSI resistance was in good accordance with our previous data, but VP-induced stimulation of PSII damage under heating required further analysis. The magnitudes of leaf heating in experiments and controls were found to be different (~46-48°C after VP and ~44-45°C without it) under identical external temperatures and were connected with different transpiration rates under these conditions. Also PSII damage and the magnitude of leaf heating were strongly correlated. As a result, it was supposed that leaf temperature contributed to VP-induced stimulation of PSII damage with heating. Investigation of VP’s influence on pea growth after heating showed that the electrical signal decreased plant growth suppression after heating (i.e. VP-induced increases in PSII damage did not noticeably influence thermal resistance in the whole plant).