Jean-Luc Raoul

Prof. Jean-Luc Raoul

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

62Years (1965-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 July 2008 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JLJosep M. Llovet
Josep M. Llovet
SRSergio Ricci
Sergio Ricci
VMVincenzo Mazzaferro
Vincenzo Mazzaferro
PHPhilip Hilgard
Philip Hilgard
EGEdward Gane
Edward Gane
JBJordi Bruix
Jordi Bruix
No effective systemic therapy exists for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. A preliminary study suggested that sorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, the platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and Raf may be effective in hepatocellular carcinoma. In this multicenter, phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned 602 patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who had not received previous systemic treatment to receive either sorafenib (at a dose of 400 mg twice daily) or placebo. Primary outcomes were overall survival and the time to symptomatic progression. Secondary outcomes included the time to radiologic progression and safety. At the second planned interim analysis, 321 deaths had occurred, and the study was stopped. Median overall survival was 10.7 months in the sorafenib group and 7.9 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio in the sorafenib group, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.55 to 0.87; P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the median time to symptomatic progression (4.1 months vs. 4.9 months, respectively, P=0.77). The median time to radiologic progression was 5.5 months in the sorafenib group and 2.8 months in the placebo group (P<0.001). Seven patients in the sorafenib group (2%) and two patients in the placebo group (1%) had a partial response; no patients had a complete response. Diarrhea, weight loss, hand–foot skin reaction, and hypophosphatemia were more frequent in the sorafenib group. In patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, median survival and the time to radiologic progression were nearly 3 months longer for patients treated with sorafenib than for those given placebo. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00105443.)

1 July 2018 in Journal of Hepatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PGPeter R. Galle
Peter R. Galle
AFAlejandro Forner
Alejandro Forner
JLJosep M. Llovet
Josep M. Llovet
VMVincenzo Mazzaferro
Vincenzo Mazzaferro
FPFabio Piscaglia
Fabio Piscaglia
VVValérie Vilgrain
Valérie Vilgrain

12 May 2011 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TCThierry Conroy
Thierry Conroy
FDFrançoise Desseigne
Françoise Desseigne
MYMarc Ychou
Marc Ychou
OBOlivier Bouché
Olivier Bouché
RGRosine Guimbaud
Rosine Guimbaud
MDMichel Ducreux
Michel Ducreux
Data are lacking on the efficacy and safety of a combination chemotherapy regimen consisting of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRINOX) as compared with gemcitabine as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. We randomly assigned 342 patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1 (on a scale of 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating a greater severity of illness) to receive FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin, 85 mg per square meter of body-surface area; irinotecan, 180 mg per square meter; leucovorin, 400 mg per square meter; and fluorouracil, 400 mg per square meter given as a bolus followed by 2400 mg per square meter given as a 46-hour continuous infusion, every 2 weeks) or gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg per square meter weekly for 7 of 8 weeks and then weekly for 3 of 4 weeks. Six months of chemotherapy were recommended in both groups in patients who had a response. The primary end point was overall survival. The median overall survival was 11.1 months in the FOLFIRINOX group as compared with 6.8 months in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio for death, 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45 to 0.73; P<0.001). Median progression-free survival was 6.4 months in the FOLFIRINOX group and 3.3 months in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio for disease progression, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.59; P<0.001). The objective response rate was 31.6% in the FOLFIRINOX group versus 9.4% in the gemcitabine group (P<0.001). More adverse events were noted in the FOLFIRINOX group; 5.4% of patients in this group had febrile neutropenia. At 6 months, 31% of the patients in the FOLFIRINOX group had a definitive degradation of the quality of life versus 66% in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.70; P<0.001). As compared with gemcitabine, FOLFIRINOX was associated with a survival advantage and had increased toxicity. FOLFIRINOX is an option for the treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer and good performance status. (Funded by the French government and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00112658.)

20 December 2018 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TCThierry Conroy
Thierry Conroy
PHPascal Hammel
Pascal Hammel
MHMohamed Hebbar
Mohamed Hebbar
MAMeher Ben Abdelghani
Meher Ben Abdelghani
AWAlice C. Wei
Alice C. Wei
JBJean-Baptiste Bachet
Jean-Baptiste Bachet
Among patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer, combination chemotherapy with fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) leads to longer overall survival than gemcitabine therapy. We compared the efficacy and safety of a modified FOLFIRINOX regimen with gemcitabine as adjuvant therapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer.

10 February 2011 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EREric Raymond
Eric Raymond
LDLaetitia Dahan
Laetitia Dahan
JRJean-Luc Raoul
Jean-Luc Raoul
YBYung-Jue Bang
Yung-Jue Bang
IBIvan Borbath
Ivan Borbath
PRPhilippe Ruszniewski
Philippe Ruszniewski
The multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib has shown activity against pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in preclinical models and phase 1 and 2 trials. We conducted a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial of sunitinib in patients with advanced, well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. All patients had Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors–defined disease progression documented within 12 months before baseline. A total of 171 patients were randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) to receive best supportive care with either sunitinib at a dose of 37.5 mg per day or placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival; secondary end points included the objective response rate, overall survival, and safety. The study was discontinued early, after the independent data and safety monitoring committee observed more serious adverse events and deaths in the placebo group as well as a difference in progression-free survival favoring sunitinib. Median progression-free survival was 11.4 months in the sunitinib group as compared with 5.5 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26 to 0.66; P<0.001). A Cox proportional-hazards analysis of progression-free survival according to baseline characteristics favored sunitinib in all subgroups studied. The objective response rate was 9.3% in the sunitinib group versus 0% in the placebo group. At the data cutoff point, 9 deaths were reported in the sunitinib group (10%) versus 21 deaths in the placebo group (25%) (hazard ratio for death, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.89; P=0.02). The most frequent adverse events in the sunitinib group were diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, asthenia, and fatigue. Continuous daily administration of sunitinib at a dose of 37.5 mg improved progression-free survival, overall survival, and the objective response rate as compared with placebo among patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. (Funded by Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00428597.)

1 February 2016 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AWAndrea Wang-Gillam
Andrea Wang-Gillam
CLChung-Pin Li
Chung-Pin Li
GBGyörgy Bodoky
György Bodoky
ADAndrew Dean
Andrew Dean
YSYan-Shen Shan
Yan-Shen Shan
MWMark Wong
Mark Wong