Anosh Mevawalla

Dr. Anosh Mevawalla

University of Waterloo, Chemical Engineering Department
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 July 2021 in Batteries
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Manh-Kien TranManh-Kien Tran
Manh-Kien Tran
ADAndre DaCosta
Andre DaCosta
Anosh MevawallaAnosh Mevawalla
Anosh Mevawalla
Satyam PanchalSatyam Panchal
Satyam Panchal
Michael FowlerMichael Fowler
Michael Fowler
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries are an important component of energy storage systems used in various applications such as electric vehicles and portable electronics. There are many chemistries of Li-ion battery, but LFP, NMC, LMO, and NCA are four commonly used types. In order for the battery applications to operate safely and effectively, battery modeling is very important. The equivalent circuit model (ECM) is a battery model often used in the battery management system (BMS) to monitor and control Li-ion batteries. In this study, experiments were performed to investigate the performance of three different ECMs (1RC, 2RC, and 1RC with hysteresis) on four Li-ion battery chemistries (LFP, NMC, LMO, and NCA). The results indicated that all three models are usable for the four types of Li-ion chemistries, with low errors. It was also found that the ECMs tend to perform better in dynamic current profiles compared to non-dynamic ones. Overall, the best-performed model for LFP and NCA was the 1RC with hysteresis ECM, while the most suited model for NMC and LMO was the 1RC ECM. The results from this study showed that different ECMs would be suited for different Li-ion battery chemistries, which should be an important factor to be considered in real-world battery and BMS applications.

15 June 2022 in Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Manh-Kien TranManh-Kien Tran
Manh-Kien Tran
Anosh MevawallaAnosh Mevawalla
Anosh Mevawalla
AAAttar Aziz
Attar Aziz
Satyam PanchalSatyam Panchal
Satyam Panchal
Yi XieYi Xie
Yi Xie
Michael FowlerMichael Fowler
Michael Fowler
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries have been utilized increasingly in recent years in various applications, such as electric vehicles (EVs), electronics, and large energy storage systems due to their long lifespan, high energy density, and high-power density, among other qualities. However, there can be faults that occur internally or externally that affect battery performance which can potentially lead to serious safety concerns, such as thermal runaway. Thermal runaway is a major challenge in the Li-ion battery field due to its uncontrollable and irreversible nature, which can lead to fires and explosions, threatening the safety of the public. Therefore, thermal runaway prognosis and diagnosis are significant topics of research. To efficiently study and develop thermal runaway prognosis and diagnosis algorithms, thermal runaway modeling is also important. Li-ion battery thermal runaway modeling, prediction, and detection can help in the development of prevention and mitigation approaches to ensure the safety of the battery system. This paper provides a comprehensive review of Li-ion battery thermal runaway modeling. Various prognostic and diagnostic approaches for thermal runaway are also discussed.

1 December 2020 in Journal of Energy Storage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Manh-Kien TranManh-Kien Tran
Manh-Kien Tran
Anosh MevawallaAnosh Mevawalla
Anosh Mevawalla
Satyam PanchalSatyam Panchal
Satyam Panchal
KRKaamran Raahemifar
Kaamran Raahemifar
MFMichael Fowler
Michael Fowler
RFRoydon Fraser
Roydon Fraser

16 December 2020 in Batteries
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Anosh MevawallaAnosh Mevawalla
Anosh Mevawalla
Satyam PanchalSatyam Panchal
Satyam Panchal
Manh-Kien TranManh-Kien Tran
Manh-Kien Tran
Michael FowlerMichael Fowler
Michael Fowler
RFRoydon Fraser
Roydon Fraser
The temperature and heat produced by lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries in electric and hybrid vehicles is an important field of investigation as it determines the power, performance, and cycle life of the battery pack. This paper presented both laboratory data and simulation results at C-rates of 1C, 2C, 3C, and 4C at an ambient temperature of approximately 23 °C. During experiment thermocouples were placed on the surface of the battery. The thermal model assumed constant current discharge and was experimentally validated. It was observed that temperature increased with C-rates at both the surface and the tabs. We note that at 4C the battery temperature increased from 22 °C to 47.40 °C and the tab temperature increased from 22 °C to 52.94 °C. Overall, the simulation results showed that more heat was produced in the cathode than the anode, the primary source of heat was the electrolyte resistance, and the battery temperature was the highest near the tabs and in the internal space of the battery. Simulation of the lithium concentration within the battery showed that the lithium concentration was more uniform in the anode than in the cathode. These results can help the accurate thermal design and thermal management of Li-ion batteries.

29 September 2022 in Batteries
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Anosh MevawallaAnosh Mevawalla
Anosh Mevawalla
YSYASMIN SHABEER
YASMIN SHABEER
Manh-Kien TranManh-Kien Tran
Manh-Kien Tran
Satyam PanchalSatyam Panchal
Satyam Panchal
Michael FowlerMichael Fowler
Michael Fowler
RFRoydon Fraser
Roydon Fraser
This paper presents three equivalent thermal circuit models with multiple input parameters, namely, the state of health (SOH), state of charge (SOC), current and temperature. Typical physiochemical models include parameters such as porosity and tortuosity, which are not easily experimentally available; this model allows for model parameters such as the internal impedance to be easily estimated using more practical inputs. The paper models the internal impedance resistance of a LiFePO4 battery at five different ambient temperatures (5, 15, 25, 35, 45 °C), at three different discharge rates (1C, 2C, 3C) and at three different SOHs (90%, 83%, 65%). The internal impedance surface fit experimental measurements with a Pearson coefficient of 0.945. Three thermal models were then created that implemented the internal resistance model. The first two thermal models were 0D models that did not include the influence of the thermal conductivity of the battery. The first model assumed simple heating through internal resistance and convection energy loss, while the second also included the Bernardi Reversible heat term. The final third model was a 2D model that included all previous heat source terms as well as tab heating. The 2D model was solved using a simple Euler method and finite center difference. The R2 values for the 0D thermal models were 0.9964 and 0.9962 for the simple internal resistance and reversible heating models, respectively. The R2 value for the 2D thermal model was 0.996.