Erik Lundkvist

Dr. Erik Lundkvist

Umeå University
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 June 2012 in Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Erik LundkvistErik Lundkvist
Erik Lundkvist
HGHenrik Gustafsson
Henrik Gustafsson
SHSören Hjälm
Sören Hjälm
PHPeter Hassmén
Peter Hassmén
Knowledge about the personal experience of burnout in elite coaches is sparse. We therefore studied subjective experiences associated with burnout in a group of elite soccer coaches; specifically how they describe perceived causes of burnout, symptoms and the subsequent recovery process. A qualitative approach was used, because our aim was to study the coaches’ personal experiences of burnout. We conducted semi-structured interviews and used interpretative phenomenological analysis to analyse the data. We interviewed eight Swedish elite soccer coaches who had previously reported high levels of burnout. We found two burnout profiles that matched the coaches’ perceived causes of burnout. The first was associated with problems in handling the performance culture itself and the second had to do with the overall situation, including workload, family and health. Our findings describe coach burnout as stemming from a combination of issues, related to both home and work. When combined with work overload, coaches who have problems handling the performance culture in elite sports, and who lack the tools to enhance recovery, are particularly vulnerable to burnout.

30 September 2017
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
HGHenrik Gustafsson
Henrik Gustafsson
DMDaniel J. Madigan
Daniel J. Madigan
Erik LundkvistErik Lundkvist
Erik Lundkvist

2 October 2016 in Perceptual and Motor Skills
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HGHenrik Gustafsson
Henrik Gustafsson
Erik LundkvistErik Lundkvist
Erik Lundkvist
LPLeslie Podlog
Leslie Podlog
CLCarolina Lundqvist
Carolina Lundqvist
More than 30 years of research on athlete burnout has yielded important insights and questions regarding the onset, nature, and consequences of this detrimental syndrome. Not surprisingly, burnout is considered an important matter, both from a research and practical standpoint. We comment on the work of Ryu, Ali, Kim, Choi, and Radlo, who examined the impact of burnout on cognitive performance among athletes.

12 June 2014 in Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Erik LundkvistErik Lundkvist
Erik Lundkvist
ASAndreas Stenling
Andreas Stenling
HGHenrik Gustafsson
Henrik Gustafsson
PHPeter Hassmén
Peter Hassmén
Although coach burnout has been studied for 30 years, what measure to use in this context has not yet been problematized. This study focuses on evaluating convergent and discriminant validity of three coach burnout measures by using multi-trait/multi-method analysis (CT-C[M-1]) model. We choose Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), the two dimensional Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI), and a coach version of Athlete Burnout Questionnaire (CBQ). Our analysis shows that MBI and OLBI cover similar definitions of exhaustion and depersonalization/disengagement and that CBQ measures somewhat different dimensions. A problem for OLBI is a lack of discriminant validity due to high correlations between exhaustion and disengagement. For lack of personal accomplishment/reduced sense of accomplishment CBQ measures a somewhat different construct than MBI. Although all three measures have advantages and disadvantages, we promote CBQ since it discriminates between dimensions and covers important aspects of burnout in a sports context that the other two do not cover

31 October 2017 in Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Erik LundkvistErik Lundkvist
Erik Lundkvist
HGHenrik Gustafsson
Henrik Gustafsson
PDP.A. Davis
P.A. Davis
SHS. Holmström
S. Holmström
NLN. Lemyre
N. Lemyre
AIA. Ivarsson
A. Ivarsson

30 September 2020 in Journal of Sports Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Anton KalénAnton Kalén
Anton Kalén
Erik LundkvistErik Lundkvist
Erik Lundkvist
AIAndreas Ivarsson
Andreas Ivarsson
EREzequiel Rey
Ezequiel Rey
Alexandra Pérez-FerreirósAlexandra Pérez-Ferreirós
Alexandra Pérez-Ferreirós
The aims of the study were to: (a) analyse the re-selection patterns in European youth basketball national teams, and (b) investigate how the chance of re-selection is influenced by the initial selection age and relative age of the players, as well as the long-term performance of the country at the youth level. The sample consisted of 8362 basketball players (5038 men, 3324 women) born 1988–1997 who have participated in at least one U16, U18 or U20 European youth basketball championship between 2004 and 2017. The results from the survival analysis showed that around 75% of male and 80% of female players participating in a championship were re-selected the following year. Also, initial selection age, relative age effect, and the country long-term performance influenced the re-selection rates, with relationships being different between men and women. To conclude, the results of the present study show that the re-selection process by which players progress in European youth national basketball teams is complex and influenced by several different factors.