Amani Alqahtani

Dr. Amani Alqahtani

Saudi Food and Drug Authority
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 January 2016 in Virologica Sinica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GBGouri Rani Banik
Gouri Rani Banik
AAAmani Alqahtani
Amani Alqahtani
RBRobert Booy
Robert Booy
HRHarunor Rashid
Harunor Rashid

1 June 2016 in International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AAAmani Alqahtani
Amani Alqahtani
KWKerrie E. Wiley
Kerrie E. Wiley
MTMohamed Tashani
Mohamed Tashani
HWHarold W. Willaby
Harold W. Willaby
AHAnita E. Heywood
Anita E. Heywood
HRHarunor Rashid
Harunor Rashid
For reasons that have yet to be elucidated, the uptake of preventive measures against infectious diseases by Hajj pilgrims is variable. The aim of this study was to identify the preventive advice and interventions received by Australian pilgrims before Hajj, and the barriers to and facilitators of their use during Hajj. Two cross-sectional surveys of Australians pilgrims aged ≥18 years were undertaken, one before and one after the Hajj 2014. Of 356 pilgrims who completed the survey (response rate 94%), 80% had the influenza vaccine, 30% the pneumococcal vaccine, and 30% the pertussis vaccine. Concern about contracting disease at Hajj was the most cited reason for vaccination (73.4%), and not being aware of vaccine availability was the main reason for non-receipt (56%). Those who obtained pre-travel advice were twice as likely to be vaccinated as those who did not seek advice. Of 150 pilgrims surveyed upon return, 94% reported practicing hand hygiene during Hajj, citing ease of use (67%) and belief in its effectiveness (62.4%) as the main reasons for compliance; university education was a significant predictor of hand hygiene adherence. Fifty-three percent used facemasks, with breathing discomfort (76%) and a feeling of suffocation (40%) being the main obstacles to compliance. This study indicates that there are significant opportunities to improve awareness among Australian Hajj pilgrims about the importance of using preventive health measures.

1 February 2015 in Clinical Microbiology and Infection
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AAAmani Alqahtani
Amani Alqahtani
Harunor RashidHarunor Rashid
Harunor Rashid
AHA.E. Heywood
A.E. Heywood

1 September 2017 in Journal of Infection and Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AAAmani Alqahtani
Amani Alqahtani
HRHarunor Rashid
Harunor Rashid
MBMada H. Basyouni
Mada H. Basyouni
TATariq M. Alhawassi
Tariq M. Alhawassi
NBNasser F. BinDhim
Nasser F. BinDhim
Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries bear the heaviest brunt of MERS-CoV. This study aims to compare public awareness and practice around MERS-CoV across GCC countries. A cross-sectional survey was conducted using the Gulf Indicators (GI) smartphone app among people in the six GCC countries, namely Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, and Oman. A total of 1812 participants recruited. All were aware of MERS-CoV, yet the perception and practice around MERS-CoV varied widely between countries. Over two thirds were either "not concerned" or "slightly concerned" about contracting MERS-CoV; believing that they were under Allah's (God's) protection (40%) was the most cited reason. While 79% were aware that the disease can transmit through droplet from infected person, only 12% stated that MERS-CoV transmits via camels; people in Saudi Arabia were better aware of the transmission. Nevertheless, only 22% of respondents believed that camels are the zoonotic reservoir of MERS-CoV. Those who were concerned about contracting MERS-CoV (aOR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.2-2.1, p<0.01) and those who thought MERS-CoV to be a severe disease only for those with high-risk conditions (aOR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.1-2.1, p<0.01) were more likely to believe that camels are the zoonotic source. However, residents of KSA (aOR: 0.03, 95% CI: 0.01-0.07, p<0.01), UAE (aOR: 0.01, 95% CI: 0.004-0.02, p<0.01) and Kuwait (aOR: 0.03, 95% CI: 0.01-0.07, p<0.01) were less likely to believe that camels are the main zoonotic source compared to respondents from the other countries. Hygienic measures were more commonly adopted than avoidance of camels or their raw products, yet there was a discrepancy between the countries. This study highlights that despite being aware of the ongoing MERS-CoV epidemic; many people lack accurate understanding about MERS-CoV transmission, prevention, and are not fully compliant with preventive measures.

26 March 2015 in Eurosurveillance
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AAAmani Alqahtani
Amani Alqahtani
KWK E Wiley
K E Wiley
HWH W Willaby
H W Willaby
NBNasser F BinDhim
Nasser F BinDhim
MTM Tashani
M Tashani
HRH Rashid
H Rashid
Upon return from Hajj 2014, 150 Australian pilgrims were interviewed about their understanding of the Ebola epidemic. Most (89%, 134/150) knew of the epidemic before travelling and 60% (80/134) of those knew Ebola transmits through body fluids. Pilgrims who received pre-travel health advice were more conscious of Ebola (69% vs 31%, p?=?0.01) and adhered better to hand hygiene after touching an ill person (68% vs 31%, p?<?0.01). Mass media was the main information source (78%).

1 May 2016 in Journal of Travel Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AAAmani Alqahtani
Amani Alqahtani
KWKerrie E. Wiley
Kerrie E. Wiley
SMSami Mukhdari Mushta
Sami Mukhdari Mushta
KYKaoruko Yamazaki
Kaoruko Yamazaki
NBNasser F. BinDhim
Nasser F. BinDhim
HRHarunor Rashid
Harunor Rashid
Through a prospective cohort study the relationship between travellers’ awareness of MERS-CoV, and compliance with preventive measures and exposure to camels was evaluated among Australian Hajj pilgrims who attended Hajj in 2015. Only 28% of Australian Hajj pilgrims were aware of MERS-CoV in Saudi Arabia. Those who were aware of MERS-CoV were more likely to receive recommended vaccines [odds ratio (OR) 3.1, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.5–5.9, P < 0.01], but there was no significant difference in avoiding camels or their raw products during Hajj between those who were aware of MERS-CoV and those who were not (OR 1.2, 95% CI: 0.3–5.2, P = 0.7). Hajj pilgrims’ awareness is reflected in some of their practices but not in all.