Farid Amirouche

Prof. Farid Amirouche

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 February 2009 in Microsystem Technologies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FAFarid Amirouche
Farid Amirouche
YZYu Zhou
Yu Zhou
TJTom Johnson
Tom Johnson

27 July 2011 in Micromachines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YZYu Zhou
Yu Zhou
FAFarid Amirouche
Farid Amirouche
This paper presents the fabrication process of a single-chamber planar valveless micropump driven by an external electromagnetic actuator. This micropump features a pair of micro diffuser and nozzle elements used to rectify the fluid flow, and an elastic magnetic membrane used to regulate the pressure in the enclosed fluid chamber. Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) is used as the main construction material of this proposed micropump, including the structural substrate and the planar actuation membrane embedded with a thin micro magnet. Both the Finite Element Method and experimental analysis are used to assess the PDMS-membrane actuation under the applied electromagnetic forces and characterize the pump performance at variable working conditions. The resonant frequency of this micropump is identified experimentally and de-ionized (DI) water is loaded to account for the coupling effects of the working fluid. The experimental data was used to demonstrate the reliability of flow rates and how it can be controlled by consistently adjusting the driving frequencies and currents. The proposed micropump is capable of delivering a maximum flow rate of 319.6 μL/min and a maximum hydrostatic backpressure of 950 Pa (9.5 cm H2O). The planar design feature of the pump allows for potential integration of the pump with other PDMS-based microfluidic systems for biomedical applications.

1 July 2016 in Spine Deformity
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FAFarid Amirouche
Farid Amirouche
Giovanni F. SolitroGiovanni F. Solitro
Giovanni F. Solitro
BMBrenden P. Magnan
Brenden P. Magnan

1 December 2014 in Clinical Biomechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FAFarid Amirouche
Farid Amirouche
Giovanni F. SolitroGiovanni F. Solitro
Giovanni F. Solitro
SBStefanie Broviak
Stefanie Broviak
MGMark Gonzalez
Mark Gonzalez
WGWayne Goldstein
Wayne Goldstein
RBRiad Barmada
Riad Barmada

23 December 2016 in International Orthopaedics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FAFarid Amirouche
Farid Amirouche
Giovanni F. SolitroGiovanni F. Solitro
Giovanni F. Solitro
AWAmit Walia
Amit Walia
MGMark Gonzalez
Mark Gonzalez
ABAimee Bobko
Aimee Bobko

1 July 2024 in JBJS Open Access
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AIAvinash Inabathula
Avinash Inabathula
DSDimitar I. Semerdzhiev
Dimitar I. Semerdzhiev
ASAnand Srinivasan
Anand Srinivasan
FAFarid Amirouche
Farid Amirouche
LPLalit Puri
Lalit Puri
HPHristo Piponov
Hristo Piponov
» Computer-assisted robots aid orthopaedic surgeons in implant positioning and bony resection. Surgeons selecting a robot for their practice are faced with numerous options. This study aims to make the choice less daunting by reviewing the most commonly used Food and Drug Administration-approved robotic total knee arthroplasty platforms in the American arthroplasty market. » Modern total knee arthroplasty (TKA) robots use computer guidance to create a virtual knee model that serves as the surgeon's canvas for resection planning. » Most available robotic TKA (rTKA) systems are closed semiactive systems that restrict implant use to those of the manufacturer. » Each system has distinct imaging requirements, safety features, resection methods, and operating room footprints that will affect a surgeon's technique and practice. » Robots carry different purchase, maintenance, and equipment costs that will influence patient access across different socioeconomic groups. » Some studies show improved early patient-reported outcomes with rTKA, but long-term studies have yet to show clinical superiority over manual TKA.