PONDOK PESANTREN DAN DERADIKALISASI ISLAM DI INDONESIA

This data article presents an important bibliometric dataset of ten Indonesian leading educational universities. These ten Indonesian leading educational universities are Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI), Universitas Negeri Malang (UM), Universitas Negeri Semarang (UNNES), Universitas Negeri Surabaya (Unesa), Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta (UNY), Universitas Negeri Makassar (UNM), Universitas Negeri Jakarta (UNJ), Universitas Negeri Padang (UNP), Universitas Negeri Medan (Unimed), and Universitas Negeri Gorontalo (UNG). Using Scopus database search analysis, this data article collects data on documents per year, subject area of documents, source title of documents, documents type, country/territory, author name and number of documents, affiliation and most cited documents for each universities.

Ranah Afektif Dalam Evaluasi Pendidikan Agama Islam, Penting Tapi Sering Terabaikan

This paper analyses publications of Islamic University of Indonesia in Scopus database. It aims to analyse the publications from number of document, author, collaborating affiliations, and comparison with other universities. Data was collected from Scopus database for the university between 2005 and 2017. The results show that university document improve continuously during research time frame. Furthermore, the results indicate that university collaboration in research is still limited to some universities having close location or having alumni as university faculty members. In comparison with other universities in Indonesia, the university is left behind and in need for further improvement. Based on the results, some suggestions can be recommended: improving faculty members’ competitiveness through incentives and commitments; enhancing more research collaboration; and expanding internationalization horizon to attract more international researchers.

The vocational high school principal is a determining factor for the progress or failure of a school. Therefore, the principal's performance evaluation must be optimal. This study explores the government direction on this performance evaluation in two neighboring countries: Indonesia and Malaysia. The research method uses a qualitative approach, by interviewing both school supervisors and principals, and analyzing documents. The steps are 1) collection of resources through multi techniques; 2) reducing data with the aim of simplifying and categorizing data; 3) presenting data in the form of qualitative descriptions; 4) drawing conclusions and 5) compiling research reports and formulate comparative research findings. For Indonesia, once a year, the School Supervisor and a team from the Education Office in Indonesia are responsible for carrying out the review of the performance of the principals of vocational schools. The current evaluation of the principal of a vocational high school in Malaysia is a component of the overall review of the school's performance. Standard of Educational Quality in Malaysia is the name given to this evaluation, and it has been in effect since 2017. Standard 1 Kepemimpin is the most important benchmark to consider in relation to principal performance (Leadership). The performance evaluation in Indonesia seems still separated from school performance evaluation or accreditation. Although each evaluation scheme has its own format and purposes, the implementation could be made in such a concurrent time. Meanwhile in Malaysia, the principal performance is likely one of the evaluated aspects in the school performance evaluation (SKPM), especially Standard 1 Kepemimpinan (leadership) and Standard 2 Pengurusan Organisasi (organization management).

Islamic Education Teachers’ Content Knowledge of Islamic Law Matters: A Study in Yogyakarta City