Stefan Bartzsch

Dr. Stefan Bartzsch

1. Institute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2015 in Physica Medica
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EBElke Bräuer-Krisch
Elke Bräuer-Krisch
JAJean-Francois Adam
Jean-Francois Adam
EAEnver Alagoz
Enver Alagoz
Stefan BartzschStefan Bartzsch
Stefan Bartzsch
JCJeff Crosbie
Jeff Crosbie
BSBjarne Stugu
Bjarne Stugu
Stereotactic Synchrotron Radiotherapy (SSRT) and Microbeam Radiation Therapy (MRT) are both novel approaches to treat brain tumor and potentially other tumors using synchrotron radiation. Although the techniques differ by their principles, SSRT and MRT share certain common aspects with the possibility of combining their advantages in the future. For MRT, the technique uses highly collimated, quasi-parallel arrays of X-ray microbeams between 50 and 600 keV. Important features of highly brilliant Synchrotron sources are a very small beam divergence and an extremely high dose rate. The minimal beam divergence allows the insertion of so called Multi Slit Collimators (MSC) to produce spatially fractionated beams of typically ∼25-75 micron-wide microplanar beams separated by wider (100-400 microns center-to-center(ctc)) spaces with a very sharp penumbra. Peak entrance doses of several hundreds of Gy are extremely well tolerated by normal tissues and at the same time provide a higher therapeutic index for various tumor models in rodents. The hypothesis of a selective radio-vulnerability of the tumor vasculature versus normal blood vessels by MRT was recently more solidified. SSRT (Synchrotron Stereotactic Radiotherapy) is based on a local drug uptake of high-Z elements in tumors followed by stereotactic irradiation with 80 keV photons to enhance the dose deposition only within the tumor. With SSRT already in its clinical trial stage at the ESRF, most medical physics problems are already solved and the implemented solutions are briefly described, while the medical physics aspects in MRT will be discussed in more detail in this paper.

1 January 2020 in Physics in Medicine & Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Stefan BartzschStefan Bartzsch
Stefan Bartzsch
SCStéphanie Corde
Stéphanie Corde
JCJeffrey C Crosbie
Jeffrey C Crosbie
LDLiam Robert James Day
Liam Robert James Day
MDMattia Donzelli
Mattia Donzelli
MTMoeava Tehei
Moeava Tehei
In the last 25 years microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional radiation therapy at large, third generation synchrotrons. In MRT, a multi-slit collimator modulates a kilovoltage x-ray beam on a micrometer scale, creating peak dose areas with unconventionally high doses of several hundred Grays separated by low dose valley regions, where the dose remains well below the tissue tolerance level. Pre-clinical evidence demonstrates that such beam geometries lead to substantially reduced damage to normal tissue at equal tumour control rates and hence drastically increase the therapeutic window. Although the mechanisms behind MRT are still to be elucidated, previous studies indicate that immune response, tumour microenvironment, and the microvasculature may play a crucial role. Beyond tumour therapy, MRT has also been suggested as a microsurgical tool in neurological disorders and as a primer for drug delivery. The physical properties of MRT demand innovative medical physics and engineering solutions for safe treatment delivery. This article reviews technical developments in MRT and discusses existing solutions for dosimetric validation, reliable treatment planning and safety. Instrumentation at synchrotron facilities, including beam production, collimators and patient positioning systems, is also discussed. Specific solutions reviewed in this article include: dosimetry techniques that can cope with high spatial resolution, low photon energies and extremely high dose rates of up to 15 000 Gy s −1 , dose calculation algorithms—apart from pure Monte Carlo Simulations—to overcome the challenge of small voxel sizes and a wide dynamic dose-range, and the use of dose-enhancing nanoparticles to combat the limited penetrability of a kilovoltage energy spectrum. Finally, concepts for alternative compact microbeam sources are presented, such as inverse Compton scattering set-ups and carbon nanotube x-ray tubes, that may facilitate the transfer of MRT into a hospital-based clinical environment. Intensive research in recent years has resulted in practical solutions to most of the technical challenges in MRT. Treatment planning, dosimetry and patient safety systems at synchrotrons have matured to a point that first veterinary and clinical studies in MRT are within reach. Should these studies confirm the promising results of pre-clinical studies, the authors are confident that MRT will become an effective new radiotherapy option for certain patients.

1 January 2013 in Radiotherapy and Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JLJean Albert Laissue
Jean Albert Laissue
Stefan BartzschStefan Bartzsch
Stefan Bartzsch
HBHans Blattmann
Hans Blattmann
EBElke Bräuer-Krisch
Elke Bräuer-Krisch
ABAlberto Bravin
Alberto Bravin
DSDaniel N. Slatkin
Daniel N. Slatkin

11 June 2015 in Medical Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Stefan BartzschStefan Bartzsch
Stefan Bartzsch
JLJohanna Lott
Johanna Lott
KWKatrin Welsch
Katrin Welsch
EBElke Bräuer‐Krisch
Elke Bräuer‐Krisch
UOUwe Oelfke
Uwe Oelfke

26 June 2015 in Journal of Synchrotron Radiation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JCJeffrey C. Crosbie
Jeffrey C. Crosbie
PFPauline Fournier
Pauline Fournier
Stefan BartzschStefan Bartzsch
Stefan Bartzsch
MDMattia Donzelli
Mattia Donzelli
ICIwan Cornelius
Iwan Cornelius
EBElke Bräuer-Krisch
Elke Bräuer-Krisch

27 October 2017 in Physics in Medicine & Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Stefan BartzschStefan Bartzsch
Stefan Bartzsch
UOUwe Oelfke
Uwe Oelfke
Currently hard coherent x-ray radiation at high photon fluxes can only be produced with large and expensive radiation sources, such as 3[Formula: see text] generation synchrotrons. Especially in medicine, this limitation prevents various promising developments in imaging and therapy from being translated into clinical practice. Here we present a new concept of highly brilliant x-ray sources, line focus x-ray tubes (LFXTs), which may serve as a powerful and cheap alternative to synchrotrons and a range of other existing technologies. LFXTs employ an extremely thin focal spot and a rapidly rotating target for the electron beam which causes a change in the physical mechanism of target heating, allowing higher electron beam intensities at the focal spot. Monte Carlo simulations and numeric solutions of the heat equation are used to predict the characteristics of the LFXT. In terms of photon flux and coherence length, the performance of the line focus x-ray tube compares with inverse Compton scattering sources. Dose rates of up to 180 Gy [Formula: see text] can be reached in 50 cm distance from the focal spot. The results demonstrate that the line focus tube can serve as a powerful compact source for phase contrast imaging and microbeam radiation therapy. The production of a prototype seems technically feasible.