Daniel Olive

Prof. Daniel Olive

Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, ICR, Marseille, France
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2011 in Journal of Clinical Investigation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Emilie MamessierEmilie Mamessier
Emilie Mamessier
ASAude Sylvain
Aude Sylvain
MTMarie-Laure Thibult
Marie-Laure Thibult
GHGilles Houvenaeghel
Gilles Houvenaeghel
JJJocelyne Jacquemier
Jocelyne Jacquemier
DODaniel Olive
Daniel Olive
NK cells are a major component of the antitumor immune response and are involved in controlling tumor progression and metastases in animal models. Here, we show that dysfunction of these cells accompanies human breast tumor progression. We characterized human peripheral blood NK (p-NK) cells and malignant mammary tumor-infiltrating NK (Ti-NK) cells from patients with noninvasive and invasive breast cancers. NK cells isolated from the peripheral blood of healthy donors and normal breast tissue were used as controls. With disease progression, we found that expression of activating NK cell receptors (such as NKp30, NKG2D, DNAM-1, and CD16) decreased while expression of inhibitory receptors (such as NKG2A) increased and that this correlated with decreased NK cell function, most notably cytotoxicity. Importantly, Ti-NK cells had more pronounced impairment of their cytotoxic potential than p-NK cells. We also identified several stroma-derived factors, including TGF-β1, involved in tumor-induced reduction of normal NK cell function. Our data therefore show that breast tumor progression involves NK cell dysfunction and that breast tumors model their environment to evade NK cell antitumor immunity. This highlights the importance of developing future therapies able to restore NK cell cytotoxicity to limit/prevent tumor escape from antitumor immunity.

17 October 2022 in Frontiers in Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CKClément Kerneur
Clément Kerneur
CCCarla E. Cano
Carla E. Cano
DODaniel Olive
Daniel Olive
Macrophages play an important role in tissue homeostasis, tissue remodeling, immune response, and progression of cancer. Consequently, macrophages exhibit significant plasticity and change their transcriptional profile and function in response to environmental, tissue, and inflammatory stimuli resulting in pro- and anti-tumor effects. Furthermore, the categorization of tissue macrophages in inflammatory situations remains difficult; however, there is an agreement that macrophages are predominantly polarized into two different subtypes with pro- and anti-inflammatory properties, the so-called M1-like and M2-like macrophages, respectively. These two macrophage classes can be considered as the extreme borders of a continuum of many intermediate subsets. On one end, M1 are pro-inflammatory macrophages that initiate an immunological response, damage tissue integrity, and dampen tumor progression by fostering robust T and natural killer (NK) cell anti-tumoral responses. On the other end, M2 are anti-inflammatory macrophages involved in tissue remodeling and tumor growth, that promote cancer cell proliferation, invasion, tumor metastasis, angiogenesis and that participate to immune suppression. These decisive roles in tumor progression occur through the secretion of cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, and matrix metalloproteases, as well as by the expression of immune checkpoint receptors in the case of M2 macrophages. Moreover, macrophage plasticity is supported by stimuli from the Tumor Microenvironment (TME) that are relayed to the nucleus through membrane receptors and signaling pathways that result in gene expression reprogramming in macrophages, thus giving rise to different macrophage polarization outcomes. In this review, we will focus on the main signaling pathways involved in macrophage polarization that are activated upon ligand-receptor recognition and in the presence of other immunomodulatory molecules in cancer.

18 October 2012 in International Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MTMarie-Laure Thibult
Marie-Laure Thibult
Emilie MamessierEmilie Mamessier
Emilie Mamessier
JGJulie Gertner-Dardenne
Julie Gertner-Dardenne
SPSonia Pastor
Sonia Pastor
SJSylvaine Just-Landi
Sylvaine Just-Landi
DODaniel Olive
Daniel Olive
The outcome of the adaptive immune response is determined by the integration of both positive and negative signals, respectively, induced upon the triggering of co-signaling receptors. One of them, programmed cell death 1 (PDCD1/PD-1) has largely been shown to be involved in the negative regulation of T-cell activation. However, PD-1 is also expressed on human B cells, and its role(s) in the process of human B-cell activation remains uncertain thus far. In this study, we describe the expression of PD-1 on the major human B-cells subsets isolated from peripheral blood and lymph nodes. We showed that PD-1 was expressed on naive B cells, was differentially expressed on peripheral IgM memory as compared with memory B cells and was lost on germinal center B cells. Expression of PD-1 ligands (PD-Ls) was induced by TLR9 activation. Finally, we showed that PD-1 was recruited to the B-cell receptor upon triggering. We determined that during TLR9 activation, blockade of PD-1/PD-Ls pathways indeed increased B-cell activation, proliferation and the production of inflammatory cytokines. Altogether, our results show, that, as reported in T cells, PD-1/PD-Ls complexes acted as inhibitors of the B-cell activation cascade and highlight the importance of devising future therapies able to modulate lymphocyte activation through the targeting of the PD-1/PD-Ls pathways.

29 June 2010 in International Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MGMarguerite Ghiotto
Marguerite Ghiotto
LGLaurent Gauthier
Laurent Gauthier
NSNacer Serriari
Nacer Serriari
SPSonia Pastor
Sonia Pastor
ATAlemseged Truneh
Alemseged Truneh
DODaniel Olive
Daniel Olive
The programmed death-1 (PD-1) molecule is involved in peripheral tolerance and in the immune escape mechanisms during chronic viral infections and cancer. PD-1 interacts with two ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2. We have investigated the molecular mechanisms of PD-1 interactions with its ligands by surface plasmon resonance and cell surface binding as well as the ability of the two ligands to compete for PD-1 binding. PD-L1 and PD-L2 bound PD-1 with comparable affinities, but striking differences were observed at the level of the association and dissociation characteristics. PD-L1, but not PD-L2, had a delayed interaction reminiscent of a phenomenon of conformational transition. These mechanisms were confirmed by using PD-L1 mAbs that delayed the dissociation of PD-L1 from PD-1. This mechanism was not restricted to PD-1 binding since PD-L1 behaved in a similar manner with its second ligand, CD80. Finally, we could demonstrate that PD-L1 and PD-L2 competed for PD-1 binding and conversely, an antagonist PD-1 mAb blocked both PD-L1 and PD-L2 binding to PD-1 and strongly enhanced T-cell proliferation. These data further emphasize the differential molecular mechanisms of interaction of PD-L1 and PD-L2 with PD-1, and suggest possible new approach for the therapy of chronic infection, cancer and transplantation.

14 April 2016 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CPChristine Pasero
Christine Pasero
GGGwenaëlle Gravis
Gwenaëlle Gravis
MGMathilde Guerin
Mathilde Guerin
SGSamuel Granjeaud
Samuel Granjeaud
JTJeanne Thomassin-Piana
Jeanne Thomassin-Piana
DODaniel Olive
Daniel Olive
The field of immunotherapy for solid tumors, such as prostate cancer, has been recently focusing on therapies that can counter tumor-mediated immunosuppression. Precise quantification and characterization of the immune infiltrates in tumors is crucial to improve treatment efficacy. Natural killer (NK) cells, major components of the antitumor immune system, have never been isolated from prostate tumors, despite their suspected role in disease progression. Here, we examined the frequency, phenotype, and functions of NK cells infiltrating control and tumor prostate tissues. NK cell infiltrates in prostate tissues were mainly CD56 (NCAM1)-positive and displayed an unexpected immature, but activated, phenotype with low or no cytotoxic potential. Furthermore, we show that TGFβ1 (TGFB1) is highly secreted into the prostate environment and partly mediates the immunosuppressive effects on NK cells. In addition to this basal level of immunotolerance to NK cells, the prostate environment became further resistant to NK cell–mediated immunity upon cancer cell infiltration. Coculture experiments revealed that prostate cancer cells induced the expression of inhibitory receptor (ILT2/LILRB1) and downregulated the expression of activating receptors NKp46 (NCR1), NKG2D (KLRK1), and CD16 (FCGR3) by NK cells, thus preventing their recognition of tumor cells. Notably, blood levels of NKp46 were also decreased in prostate cancer patients and were inversely correlated with levels of prostate-specific antigen, the main prognostic factor in prostate cancer. Our study shows that a strong immunosuppressive environment impairs NK cell function at multiple levels in prostate cancer and provides a rationale for the design of therapies that restore NK cell efficiency in the prostate tumor microenvironment. Cancer Res; 76(8); 1–13. ©2016 AACR.

29 April 2015 in Oncotarget
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CPChristine Pasero
Christine Pasero
GGGwenaëlle Gravis
Gwenaëlle Gravis
SGSamuel Granjeaud
Samuel Granjeaud
MGMathilde Guerin
Mathilde Guerin
JTJeanne Thomassin-Piana
Jeanne Thomassin-Piana
DODaniel Olive
Daniel Olive
Highly effective NK cells are associated with good prognosis in patients with metastatic prostate cancer