Predictive Oncology Laboratory, Cancer Research Center of Marseille (CRCM), Inserm U1068,CNRS UMR7258, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix Marseille Université, 13009 Marseille, France
Dr. Emilie Mamessier
Predictive Oncology Laboratory, Cancer Research Center of Marseille (CRCM), Inserm U1068,CNRS UMR7258, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix Marseille Université, 13009 Marseille, France
NK cells are a major component of the antitumor immune response and are involved in controlling tumor progression and metastases in animal models. Here, we show that dysfunction of these cells accompanies human breast tumor progression. We characterized human peripheral blood NK (p-NK) cells and malignant mammary tumor-infiltrating NK (Ti-NK) cells from patients with noninvasive and invasive breast cancers. NK cells isolated from the peripheral blood of healthy donors and normal breast tissue were used as controls. With disease progression, we found that expression of activating NK cell receptors (such as NKp30, NKG2D, DNAM-1, and CD16) decreased while expression of inhibitory receptors (such as NKG2A) increased and that this correlated with decreased NK cell function, most notably cytotoxicity. Importantly, Ti-NK cells had more pronounced impairment of their cytotoxic potential than p-NK cells. We also identified several stroma-derived factors, including TGF-β1, involved in tumor-induced reduction of normal NK cell function. Our data therefore show that breast tumor progression involves NK cell dysfunction and that breast tumors model their environment to evade NK cell antitumor immunity. This highlights the importance of developing future therapies able to restore NK cell cytotoxicity to limit/prevent tumor escape from antitumor immunity.
Expression of programmed cell death receptor ligand 1 (PDL1) has been scarcely studied in breast cancer. Recently PD1/PDL1-inhibitors have shown promising results in different carcinomas with correlation between PDL1 tumor expression and responses. We retrospectively analyzed PDL1 mRNA expression in 45 breast cancer cell lines and 5,454 breast cancers profiled using DNA microarrays. Compared to normal breast samples, PDL1 expression was upregulated in 20% of clinical samples and 38% of basal tumors. High expression was associated with poor-prognosis features (large tumor size, high grade, ER-negative, PR-negative, ERBB2-positive status, high proliferation, basal and ERBB2-enriched subtypes). PDL1 upregulation was associated with biological signs of strong cytotoxic local immune response. PDL1 upregulation was not associated with survival in the whole population, but was associated with better metastasis-free and overall specific survivals in basal tumors, independently of clinicopathological features. Pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was higher in case of PDL1 upregulation (50% versus 21%). In conclusion, PDL1 upregulation, more frequent in basal breast cancers, was associated with increased T-cell cytotoxic immune response. In this aggressive subtype, upregulation was associated with better survival and response to chemotherapy. Reactivation of dormant tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes by PDL1-inhibitors could represent promising strategy in PDL1-upregulated basal breast cancer.
The outcome of the adaptive immune response is determined by the integration of both positive and negative signals, respectively, induced upon the triggering of co-signaling receptors. One of them, programmed cell death 1 (PDCD1/PD-1) has largely been shown to be involved in the negative regulation of T-cell activation. However, PD-1 is also expressed on human B cells, and its role(s) in the process of human B-cell activation remains uncertain thus far. In this study, we describe the expression of PD-1 on the major human B-cells subsets isolated from peripheral blood and lymph nodes. We showed that PD-1 was expressed on naive B cells, was differentially expressed on peripheral IgM memory as compared with memory B cells and was lost on germinal center B cells. Expression of PD-1 ligands (PD-Ls) was induced by TLR9 activation. Finally, we showed that PD-1 was recruited to the B-cell receptor upon triggering. We determined that during TLR9 activation, blockade of PD-1/PD-Ls pathways indeed increased B-cell activation, proliferation and the production of inflammatory cytokines. Altogether, our results show, that, as reported in T cells, PD-1/PD-Ls complexes acted as inhibitors of the B-cell activation cascade and highlight the importance of devising future therapies able to modulate lymphocyte activation through the targeting of the PD-1/PD-Ls pathways.
Medullary breast cancer (MBC) is a rare but enigmatic pathologic type of breast cancer. Despite features of aggressiveness, MBC is associated with a favorable prognosis. Morphologic diagnosis remains difficult in many cases. Very little is known about the molecular alterations involved in MBC. Notably, it is not clear whether MBC and ductal breast cancer (DBC) represent molecularly distinct entities and what genes/proteins might account for their differences. Using whole-genome oligonucleotide microarrays, we compared gene expression profiles of 22 MBCs and 44 grade III DBCs. We show that MBCs are less heterogeneous than DBCs. Whereas different molecular subtypes (luminal A, luminal B, basal, ERBB2-overexpressing, and normal-like) exist in DBCs, 95% MBCs display a basal profile, similar to that of basal DBCs. Supervised analysis identified gene expression signatures that discriminated MBCs from DBCs. Discriminator genes are associated with various cellular processes related to MBC features, in particular immune reaction and apoptosis. As compared with MBCs, basal DBCs overexpress genes involved in smooth muscle cell differentiation, suggesting that MBCs are a distinct subgroup of basal breast cancer with limited myoepithelial differentiation. Finally, MBCs overexpress a series of genes located on the 12p13 and 6p21 chromosomal regions known to contain pluripotency genes. Our results contribute to a better understanding of MBC and of mammary oncogenesis in general. (Cancer Res 2006; (66)9: 4634-44)
21 May 2010 in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment