Jordy Kaufman

Dr. Jordy Kaufman


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 April 2015 in Psychological Science in the Public Interest
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KHKathy Hirsh-Pasek
Kathy Hirsh-Pasek
JZJennifer M. Zosh
Jennifer M. Zosh
RGRoberta Michnick Golinkoff
Roberta Michnick Golinkoff
JGJames H. Gray
James H. Gray
MRMichael B. Robb
Michael B. Robb
JKJordy Kaufman
Jordy Kaufman
Children are in the midst of a vast, unplanned experiment, surrounded by digital technologies that were not available but 5 years ago. At the apex of this boom is the introduction of applications (“apps”) for tablets and smartphones. However, there is simply not the time, money, or resources available to evaluate each app as it enters the market. Thus, “educational” apps—the number of which, as of January 2015, stood at 80,000 in Apple’s App Store (Apple, 2015)—are largely unregulated and untested. This article offers a way to define the potential educational impact of current and future apps. We build upon decades of work on the Science of Learning, which has examined how children learn best. From this work, we abstract a set of principles for two ultimate goals. First, we aim to guide researchers, educators, and designers in evidence-based app development. Second, by creating an evidence-based guide, we hope to set a new standard for evaluating and selecting the most effective existing children’s apps. In short, we will show how the design and use of educational apps aligns with known processes of children’s learning and development and offer a framework that can be used by parents and designers alike. Apps designed to promote active, engaged, meaningful, and socially interactive learning—four “pillars” of learning—within the context of a supported learning goal are considered educational.

1 April 1998 in Cognitive Brain Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NSNoah J Sandstrom
Noah J Sandstrom
JKJordy Kaufman
Jordy Kaufman
SHScott A. Huettel
Scott A. Huettel

1 June 2018 in Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BHBrittany Huber
Brittany Huber
MYMegan Yeates
Megan Yeates
DMDenny Meyer
Denny Meyer
LFLorraine Fleckhammer
Lorraine Fleckhammer
JKJordy Kaufman
Jordy Kaufman

1 March 2016 in Computers in Human Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BHBrittany Huber
Brittany Huber
JTJoanne Tarasuik
Joanne Tarasuik
MAMariana N. Antoniou
Mariana N. Antoniou
CGChelsee Garrett
Chelsee Garrett
SBSteven J. Bowe
Steven J. Bowe
JKJordy Kaufman
Jordy Kaufman

1 November 2004 in NeuroReport
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VRVincent M Reid
Vincent M Reid
TSTricia Striano
Tricia Striano
JKJordy Kaufman
Jordy Kaufman
MJMark H. Johnson
Mark H. Johnson
A major issue in developmental science is how infants use the direction of other's eye gaze to facilitate the processing of information. Four-month-old infants passively viewed images of an adult face gazing toward or away from objects. When presented with the objects a second time, infants showed differences in a slow wave event-related potential, indicating that uncued objects were perceived as less familiar than objects previously cued by the direction of gaze of another person. This result shows that the direction of eye gaze of another cannot only bias infant attention, but also lead to enhanced information processing of the objects concerned.

1 April 2021 in Computers & Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PAPaola Araiza-Alba
Paola Araiza-Alba
TKTherese Keane
Therese Keane
BMBERNADETTE Lucy MATTHEWS
BERNADETTE Lucy MATTHEWS
KSKate Simpson
Kate Simpson
GSGrace Strugnell
Grace Strugnell
JKJordy Kaufman
Jordy Kaufman