Vincent M Reid

Prof. Vincent M Reid

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2017 in Current Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
VRVincent M Reid
Vincent M Reid
KDKirsty Jayne Dunn
Kirsty Jayne Dunn
RYRobert J. Young
Robert J. Young
JAJohnson Amu
Johnson Amu
TDTim Donovan
Tim Donovan
NRNadja Reissland
Nadja Reissland
In the third trimester of pregnancy, the human fetus has the capacity to process perceptual information [1-3]. With advances in 4D ultrasound technology, detailed assessment of fetal behavior [4] is now possible. Furthermore, modeling of intrauterine conditions has indicated a substantially greater luminance within the uterus than previously thought [5]. Consequently, light conveying perceptual content could be projected through the uterine wall and perceived by the fetus, dependent on how light interfaces with maternal tissue. We do know that human infants at birth show a preference to engage with a top-heavy, face-like stimulus when contrasted with all other forms of stimuli [6, 7]. However, the viability of performing such an experiment based on visual stimuli projected through the uterine wall with fetal participants is not currently known. We examined fetal head turns to visually presented upright and inverted face-like stimuli. Here we show that the fetus in the third trimester of pregnancy is more likely to engage with upright configural stimuli when contrasted to inverted visual stimuli, in a manner similar to results with newborn participants. The current study suggests that postnatal experience is not required for this preference. In addition, we describe a new method whereby it is possible to deliver specific visual stimuli to the fetus. This new technique provides an important new pathway for the assessment of prenatal visual perceptual capacities.

27 August 2004 in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MHMichelle De Haan
Michelle De Haan
JBJay Belsky
Jay Belsky
VRVincent M Reid
Vincent M Reid
AVAgnes Volein
Agnes Volein
MJMark H. Johnson
Mark H. Johnson

1 October 2006 in Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TSTricia Striano
Tricia Striano
VRVincent M Reid
Vincent M Reid

30 April 2012 in Developmental Neuropsychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSManuela Stets
Manuela Stets
DSDaniel Richard Stahl
Daniel Richard Stahl
VRVincent M Reid
Vincent M Reid
In this meta-analysis, we examined interrelationships between characteristics of infant event-related potential (ERP) studies and their attrition rates. One-hundred and forty-nine published studies provided information on 314 experimental groups of which 181 provided data on attrition. A random effects meta-analysis revealed a high average attrition rate of 49.2%. Additionally, we used meta-regression for 178 groups with attrition data to analyze which variables best explained attrition variance. Our main findings were that the nature of the stimuli—visual, auditory, or combined as well as if stimuli were animated—influenced exclusion rates from the final analysis and that infant age did not alter attrition rates.

1 November 2004 in NeuroReport
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VRVincent M Reid
Vincent M Reid
TSTricia Striano
Tricia Striano
JKJordy Kaufman
Jordy Kaufman
MJMark H. Johnson
Mark H. Johnson
A major issue in developmental science is how infants use the direction of other's eye gaze to facilitate the processing of information. Four-month-old infants passively viewed images of an adult face gazing toward or away from objects. When presented with the objects a second time, infants showed differences in a slow wave event-related potential, indicating that uncued objects were perceived as less familiar than objects previously cued by the direction of gaze of another person. This result shows that the direction of eye gaze of another cannot only bias infant attention, but also lead to enhanced information processing of the objects concerned.

31 May 2006 in European Journal of Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TSTricia Striano
Tricia Striano
VRVincent M Reid
Vincent M Reid
SHStefanie Hoehl
Stefanie Hoehl