Xavier Triadó-Ivern

Dr. Xavier Triadó-Ivern

Universitat de Barcelona
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 May 2014 in Quality in Higher Education
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JGJoaquín Gairín
Joaquín Gairín
Xavier Triadó-IvernXavier Triadó-Ivern
Xavier Triadó-Ivern
MFMònica Feixas
Mònica Feixas
PFPilar Figuera
Pilar Figuera
APAparicio-Chueca Pilar
Aparicio-Chueca Pilar
MTMercedes Torrado
Mercedes Torrado
Data from over 21,600 students who left Catalan higher education institutions during the academic years 2000–2001 and 2001–2002 have been analysed in order to describe the academic and personal profiles of university dropouts. Additionally, a telephone survey and face-to-face interviews with a pilot group of leavers were conducted to gather additional qualitative information about the reasons for their decision. The influences on non-completion can be reduced to three main factors, among which dissatisfaction with the quality of the students’ experience, family and work responsibilities as well as economic difficulties, are prominent. Analysis conducted showed no significant differences between Catalan higher education institutions, with dropout percentages ranging from 28% to 33%. These rates should be understood within a context of broad access to higher education. Within the European Higher Education Area scenario, the findings have triggered institutional endeavours to improve the quality of the students’ and teachers’ experience.

2 August 2012 in REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IBImma Torra Bitlloch
Imma Torra Bitlloch
IVIgnacio De Corral Manuel de Villena
Ignacio De Corral Manuel de Villena
MCMaría José Pérez Cabrera
María José Pérez Cabrera
TCTeresa Pagés Costas
Teresa Pagés Costas
EVElena Valderrama Valles
Elena Valderrama Valles
Xavier Triadó-IvernXavier Triadó-Ivern
Xavier Triadó-Ivern
Este artículo presenta el proyecto desarrollado durante el año 2011 por las unidades y centros de formación de las universidades públicas catalanas. El proyecto se orienta a la mejora de la calidad del sistema de educación superior y de la actividad del profesorado universitario mediante planes de formación específicamente diseñados con esta finalidad, centrándose primeramente en la identificación de competencias docentes definidas por la comunidad académica. Partiendo del contexto de implementación del Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior se identifican aquellas competencias propias de la función docente, para que posteriormente puedan ser adquiridas, desarrolladas y evaluadas mediante la formación, identificando modelos, estrategias, instrumentos y recursos que lo permitan. El proceso de identificación de las competencias docentes del profesorado universitario se ha desarrollado partiendo de una revisión bibliográfica del estado del arte, para posteriormente ser modificada y validada por grupos de discusión conformados por expertos en competencias y formación docente. Los resultados de identificación de dichas competencias han sido finalmente refrendados mediante una encuesta respondida por una muestra representativa de la comunidad académica de las ocho universidades públicas catalanas. El objetivo fundamental del proyecto que aquí presentamos no es otro que el de contribuir a una formación de calidad del profesorado universitario, que permita la adquisición, desarrollo y evaluación de las competencias que, como docente, gran parte de la comunidad académica considera que debe poseer para el ejercicio de su labor profesional, definidas como: interpersonal, metodológica, comunicativa, de planificación y gestión de la docencia, de trabajo en equipo y de innovación.

30 March 2023 in Education Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JAJuan Antonio Amador-Campos
Juan Antonio Amador-Campos
MCMaribel Peró Cebollero
Maribel Peró Cebollero
Maria Feliu-TorruellaMaria Feliu-Torruella
Maria Feliu-Torruella
APAlba Pérez-González
Alba Pérez-González
CCCristina Cañete-Massé
Cristina Cañete-Massé
JGJoan Guàrdia-Olmos
Joan Guàrdia-Olmos
Effective mentoring is an integral component of the doctoral dissertation process. This study aimed to determine the psychometric properties of two questionnaires developed to assess research self-efficacy and the mentoring/supervision process. The sample comprised 1265 doctorate students (mean age = 32.36 years; standard deviation = 8.20). Items in both questionnaires had adequate discrimination indexes and principal component analysis supported the unifactorial structure of each questionnaire, with adequate percentages of explained variance (47.5% and 60%, respectively). Reliability was good or excellent: α = 0.71 and α = 0.94. In the research self-efficacy questionnaire, there was a significant interaction between gender and year of doctoral studies. Men had higher scores in the first, second and third years of their doctoral studies than women, but this ranking was reversed for the fourth and fifth years. In the mentoring/supervision questionnaire, PhD students in their first year had a higher score than those in the third, fourth and fifth years, and students in the second year had a higher score than those in the fifth year. Understanding students’ perception of their research self-efficacy and the mentoring process is of great importance given the relationship between the mentoring process and students’ academic performance and personal well-being.

29 September 2023 in Studies in Higher Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JLJose Ortiz Lozano
Jose Ortiz Lozano
APAparicio-Chueca Pilar
Aparicio-Chueca Pilar
Xavier Triadó-IvernXavier Triadó-Ivern
Xavier Triadó-Ivern
JAJose Luis Arroyo-Barrigüete
Jose Luis Arroyo-Barrigüete

3 March 2020 in Innovations in Education and Teaching International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Xavier Triadó-IvernXavier Triadó-Ivern
Xavier Triadó-Ivern
APAparicio-Chueca Pilar
Aparicio-Chueca Pilar
AEAmal Elasri-Ejjaberi
Amal Elasri-Ejjaberi
IMIrene Maestro-Yarza
Irene Maestro-Yarza
MBMerce Bernardo
Merce Bernardo
PMP. Presas Maynegre
P. Presas Maynegre
The aim of this study is to identify and analyse the most important reasons that influence absenteeism in university classrooms from the students' perspective. Data have been gathered through a questionnaire answered by 1,896 students from the Business Administration, Economics and Sociology degrees of theUniversitatdeBarcelona, Spain. Both a difference of means and exploratory factor analyses have been applied. Findings show that students differ on these reasons regarding their year and degree of study. The results of the factor analysis reveal five dimensions of reasons for absenteeism: (1) students' own planning, (2) teaching methodology, (3) learning methodology, (4) course characteristics, and (5) external sources available. These factors call for effective action lines that eliminate the inefficiencies of public resources.

15 December 2011 in Quality & Quantity
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Xavier Triadó-IvernXavier Triadó-Ivern
Xavier Triadó-Ivern
APAparicio-Chueca Pilar
Aparicio-Chueca Pilar
JGJoan Guàrdia-Olmos
Joan Guàrdia-Olmos
MCMaribel Peró Cebollero
Maribel Peró Cebollero
NJNatalia Jaría-Chacón
Natalia Jaría-Chacón
Works on student absenteeism in the universities have not been preferential for the authors in the field of educational research. Usually, what has been made is an approach to the available absenteeism data as an intervening variable or as a variable characteristic of the educational process, but not as a dependent variable in the strict sense of the term. In this work, we intend to make an empirical approach to the possible reasons of student absenteeism. There is a double point of view: the students’ and the professors’; the reasons that justify it according to its protagonists are studied. This paper focuses on the six university degrees taught at the School of Economy and Business of the University of Barcelona (Facultat d’Economia i Empresa de la Universitat de Barcelona). An “ad-hoc” questionnaire has been prepared and the opinions of 1,162 undergraduates have been analyzed. The reasons given by each population differ in hierarchy and motivations.