This study aimed to review the oral hygiene status, oral care guidelines, and outcomes of oral care in intensive care unit (ICU) patients from a dental perspective for effective oral care. A literature search using the keywords “Hospital dentistry” OR “Oral care” OR “Intensive care unit” OR “Hospital inpatient” OR “Hospitalization” OR “Emergency service” AND “Oral health” OR “Oral hygiene” OR “Dental plaque” was conducted in PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholar to identify publications reporting on the oral care of the patients admitted to ICUs. A total of 17,400 articles were initially identified. Of these, 58 were selected and classified into three categories for critical review. Seven of these studies evaluated the oral status of ICU patients, and most of the studies indicated that ICU patients had poor oral hygiene or required active dental treatment. Thirty-three of these studies evaluated oral care methods for ICU patients, and in general, oral care methods using chlorhexidine as adjuncts along with tooth brushing were recommended. However, there were insufficient studies to evaluate oral hygiene through effective assessment tools from a dental perspective. In 36 studies on the outcomes of oral care in ICU patients, interventions by dental professionals showed effective results in preventing hospital-acquired infection. This review highlights the importance of establishing guidelines for the evaluation of oral status in ICU patients and summarizes data that may be useful for future studies. Further studies on maintaining good oral hygiene among ICU patients are needed.

Kim IH, et al. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jun;43(3):191-196. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2017.43.3.191

Kim IH, et al. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Sep;17(3):205-213. https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2017.17.3.205

This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical properties in vitro and the bone regeneration of whitlockite (WH) compared with hydroxyapatite (HA) or β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP)-based material. We investigated the morphology and phase composition of the bone grafts using a scanning electron microscope and X-ray diffractometer patterns and tested the compressive strength. Four circular defects of 8 mm in diameter were created on the calvaria of twelve rabbits. One defect was left empty, and each of the other defects was filled with WH, HA, and β-TCP. At 4 and 8 weeks, the specimens were harvested to evaluate for the new bone formation and the remaining bone grafts. Regarding the biomechanical properties, the three grafts had a similar micropore size, and WH showed nanopores. The compressive strength of WH was higher than HA and β-TCP without statistical significance. The radiological and histomorphometric analyses demonstrated that the new bone formation was similar among the groups. The remaining bone graft of the WH group was greater than that of the HA and β-TCP groups at 4 weeks (p < 0.05), and the total bone area of the WH, HA, and β-TCP groups was greater than that of the other (p < 0.01). WH has excellent volumetric stability and osteoconductivity compared with HA and β-TCP.

An autogenous, demineralized, dentin matrix is a well-known osteo-inductive bone substitute that is mostly composed of type I collagen and is widely used in implant dentistry. This single case report describes a successful outcome in guided bone regeneration and dental implantation with a novel human-derived collagen membrane. The authors fabricated a dentin-derived-barrier membrane from a block-type autogenous demineralized dentin matrix to overcome the mechanical instability of the collagen membrane. The dentin-derived-barrier acted as an osteo-inductive collagen membrane with mechanical and clot stabilities, and it replaced the osteo-genetic function of the periosteum. Further research involving large numbers of patients should be conducted to evaluate bone forming capacity in comparison with other collagen membranes.

Demineralized dentin matrix (DDM) treated with gamma irradiation (GR) has shown promising results as an allograft without any adverse effects in in vivo and clinical studies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of 15 and 25 kGy GR on the osteoinductive properties of DDM at extra-skeletal sites. As a control group, non-irradiated DDM powder was implanted into the right subcutaneous tissues of the dorsal thigh muscles of 20 nude mice. DDM powder irradiated with 15 and 25 kGy was implanted into the left side. After two and four weeks, the bone mineral density (BMD) was measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. After confirming osteoblast- and osteoclast-specific activities by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining, a histological analysis was performed to measure the new bone formation and the number of osteoblasts and osteoclast-like cells on the surface of the DDMs. Histomorphometry was used to calculate the new bone formation area on the surface of the DDM particles (DDMs). The BMD in all the groups increased from two and four weeks without statistically significant differences. The osteoblasts were dominantly activated on DDM without GR, and DDM treated with 25 kGy compared to DDM treated with 15 kGy. Among the groups, new bone formation was identified in all the groups at each time point. In conclusion, GR at doses of 15 and 25 kGy does not affect the osteoinductive properties of DDM powder.