Cancer cells respond to various stressful conditions through the dynamic regulation of RNA m6A modification. Doxorubicin is a widely used chemotherapeutic drug that induces DNA damage. It is interesting to know whether cancer cells regulate the DNA damage response and doxorubicin sensitivity through RNA m6A modification. Here, we found that doxorubicin treatment significantly induced RNA m6A methylation in breast cancer cells in both a dose- and a time-dependent manner. However, protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) inhibited RNA m6A modification under doxorubicin treatment by enhancing the nuclear translocation of the RNA demethylase AlkB homolog 5 (ALKBH5), which was previously believed to be exclusively localized in the nucleus. Then, ALKBH5 removed the m6A methylation of BRCA1 for mRNA stabilization and further enhanced DNA repair competency to decrease doxorubicin efficacy in breast cancer cells. Importantly, we identified the approved drug tadalafil as a novel PRMT5 inhibitor that could decrease RNA m6A methylation and increase doxorubicin sensitivity in breast cancer. The strategy of targeting PRMT5 with tadalafil is a promising approach to promote breast cancer sensitivity to doxorubicin through RNA methylation regulation.

Background As an emerging treatment strategy for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), immunotherapy acts in part by inducing ferroptosis. Recent studies have shown that protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) has distinct roles in immunotherapy among multiple cancers by modulating the tumor microenvironment. However, the role of PRMT5 during ferroptosis, especially for TNBC immunotherapy, is unclear. Methods PRMT5 expression in TNBC was measured by IHC (immunohistochemistry) staining. To explore the function of PRMT5 in ferroptosis inducers and immunotherapy, functional experiments were conducted. A panel of biochemical assays was used to discover potential mechanisms. Results PRMT5 promoted ferroptosis resistance in TNBC but impaired ferroptosis resistance in non-TNBC. Mechanistically, PRMT5 selectively methylated KEAP1 and thereby downregulated NRF2 and its downstream targets which can be divided into two groups: pro-ferroptosis and anti-ferroptosis. We found that the cellular ferrous level might be a critical factor in determining cell fate as NRF2 changes. In the context of higher ferrous concentrations in TNBC cells, PRMT5 inhibited the NRF2/HMOX1 pathway and slowed the import of ferrous. In addition, a high PRMT5 protein level indicated strong resistance of TNBC to immunotherapy, and PRMT5 inhibitors potentiated the therapeutic efficacy of immunotherapy. Conclusions Our results reveal that the activation of PRMT5 can modulate iron metabolism and drive resistance to ferroptosis inducers and immunotherapy. Accordingly, PRMT5 can be used as a target to change the immune resistance of TNBC.

Prognostic Significance of Interactions Between ER Alpha and ER Beta and Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer Cases Breast cancer;ER alpha;ER beta;interaction;lymph node;metastasis; Objective: Both estrogen receptors, ER alpha ($ER{\alpha}$) and ER beta ($ER{\beta}$), are expressed in 50-70% of breast cancer cases. The role of $ER{\alpha}$ as a prognostic marker in breast cancer has been well established as its expression is negative correlated with tumor size and lymph node metastasis. $ER{\beta}$ is also a favorable prognostic predictor although this is less well documented than for $ER{\alpha}$. Materials and Methods: To explore whether ERs independently or together might influence clinical outcome in breast cancer, the correlation between the ERs with the clinicopathological features was analyzed in 84 patients. Results: $ER{\alpha}$ expression negatively correlated with tumor stage (r=-0.246, p=0.028) and tended to be negatively correlated with lymph node status (r=-0.156, p=0.168) and tumor size (r=-0.246, p=0.099). Also, $ER{\beta}$ was negatively correlated with nodal status (r=-0.243, p=0.028), as was coexpression of $ER{\alpha}$ and $ER{\beta}$ (p=0.043, OR=0.194, 95% CI= 0.040-0.953). Conclusion: Coexpression of ERs might serve as an indicator of good prognosis in breast cancer patients.