John Murphy

John Murphy

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 August 2023 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PHPeter Haase
Peter Haase
DBDiana E. Bowler
Diana E. Bowler
NBNathan Jay Baker
Nathan Jay Baker
NBNúria Bonada
Núria Bonada
SDSami Domisch
Sami Domisch
EWEllen A. R. Welti
Ellen A. R. Welti
Owing to a long history of anthropogenic pressures, freshwater ecosystems are among the most vulnerable to biodiversity loss1. Mitigation measures, including wastewater treatment and hydromorphological restoration, have aimed to improve environmental quality and foster the recovery of freshwater biodiversity2. Here, using 1,816 time series of freshwater invertebrate communities collected across 22 European countries between 1968 and 2020, we quantified temporal trends in taxonomic and functional diversity and their responses to environmental pressures and gradients. We observed overall increases in taxon richness (0.73% per year), functional richness (2.4% per year) and abundance (1.17% per year). However, these increases primarily occurred before the 2010s, and have since plateaued. Freshwater communities downstream of dams, urban areas and cropland were less likely to experience recovery. Communities at sites with faster rates of warming had fewer gains in taxon richness, functional richness and abundance. Although biodiversity gains in the 1990s and 2000s probably reflect the effectiveness of water-quality improvements and restoration projects, the decelerating trajectory in the 2010s suggests that the current measures offer diminishing returns. Given new and persistent pressures on freshwater ecosystems, including emerging pollutants, climate change and the spread of invasive species, we call for additional mitigation to revive the recovery of freshwater biodiversity.

JJJohn Iwan Jones
John Iwan Jones
AVAlena Vdovchenko
Alena Vdovchenko
DCDave Cooling
Dave Cooling
JMJohn Murphy
John Murphy
AAAmanda Arnold
Amanda Arnold
Marina ResminiMarina Resmini
Marina Resmini
Despite growing interest in the environmental impact of microplastics, a standardized characterization method is not available. We carried out a systematic analysis of reliable global data detailing the relative abundance of polymers in freshwaters and estuaries. The polymers were identified according to seven main categories: polyethylene terephthalate, polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride, polypropylene, polystyrene, polyurethane and a final category of miscellaneous plastic. The results show that microplastics comprised of polyvinyl chloride and polyurethane are significantly less abundant than would be expected based on global production, possibly due to their use. This has implications for models of microplastic release into the environment based on production and fate. When analysed by matrix (water, sediment or biota) distinct profiles were obtained for each category. Polyethylene, polypropylene and polystyrene were more abundant in sediment than in biota, while miscellaneous plastics was more frequent in biota. The data suggest that environmental sorting of microplastic particles, influenced by physical, chemical and biological processes, may play a key role in environmental impact, although partitioning among matrices based on density was not realized. The distinct profile of microplastics in biota raises an important question regarding potential selectivity in uptake by organisms, highlighting the priority for more and better-informed laboratory exposure studies.

8 September 2017 in River Research and Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJohn Murphy
John Murphy
JJJohn Iwan Jones
John Iwan Jones
AAA. Arnold
A. Arnold
CDC. P. Duerdoth
C. P. Duerdoth
JPJ. L. Pretty
J. L. Pretty
Adie CollinsAdie Collins
Adie Collins
Excessive inputs of fine‐grained sediment can damage aquatic ecosystems both by degrading habitat condition and by directly impairing biota. Recent research has improved our understanding of how benthic macroinvertebrates respond to fine‐grained sediment stress, leading to the development of a variety of bioassessment indices based on changes in taxonomic composition and biological trait composition. Use of biological traits as indicators of stress has been advocated on the basis of a better mechanistic understanding of the biotic and abiotic factors acting on benthic communities. We quantified changes in the macroinvertebrate biological trait assemblage from a large number of river reaches spanning a national‐scale gradient of increasing agricultural fine sediment delivery and retention, having first factored out variation associated with the natural environmental gradient, with the aim of robustly testing predictions of trait response. We found strong support for 2 of 18 predictions of how macroinvertebrate traits would respond to fine sediment stress. Furthermore, using an independent dataset, we were able to confirm the response of 5 of 6 trait classes that partial RLQ‐fourth corner analysis found to be significantly associated with the fine sediment gradient. Prevalence of eggs as a resistant form, in combination with either an adult aquatic life stage or crawling, provided the best indication of fine sediment conditions in streams, approaching the performance of taxonomic composition‐based sediment indices, CoFSIsp and EPSImtl. This study has robustly confirmed the potential of macroinvertebrate biological traits as indicators of fine sediment impacts.

4 April 2025 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RCRob Cooke
Rob Cooke
COCharlotte L. Outhwaite
Charlotte L. Outhwaite
ABAndrew J. Bladon
Andrew J. Bladon
JMJoseph Millard
Joseph Millard
JRJames G. Rodger
James G. Rodger
NINick J. B. Isaac
Nick J. B. Isaac
Insects dominate animal species diversity yet face many threats from anthropogenic drivers of change. Many features of insect ecology make them a challenging group, and the fragmented state of knowledge compromises our ability to make general statements about their status. In this Review, we discuss the challenges of assessing insect biodiversity change. We describe how multiple lines of evidence—time series, spatial comparisons, experiments, and expert opinion—can be integrated to provide a synthesis overview of how insect biodiversity responds to drivers. Applying this approach will generate testable predictions of insect biodiversity across space, time, and changing drivers. Given the urgency of accelerating human impacts across the environment, this approach could yield a much-needed rapid assessment of insect biodiversity change.

22 March 2017 in River Research and Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MWMartin A. Wilkes
Martin A. Wilkes
MMM. Mckenzie
M. Mckenzie
JMJohn Murphy
John Murphy
RCR. P. Chadd
R. P. Chadd

22 February 2017 in Ecohydrology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JJJohn Iwan Jones
John Iwan Jones
TDTheresa A. Douthwright
Theresa A. Douthwright
AAAmanda Arnold
Amanda Arnold
CDChas P. Duerdoth
Chas P. Duerdoth
JMJohn Murphy
John Murphy
JPJames L. Pretty
James L. Pretty
Excessive delivery of fine sediments to water bodies has a detrimental impact on the biotic elements used for water body status classification. Although diatoms are typically used to assess stress from eutrophication, as fine sediment has the potential to impact diatoms in many ways, it is not surprising that an index based on benthic diatom assemblages has been proposed: the relative abundance of motile species. This measure is based on the fact that many raphid diatom species are capable of migrating through deposited sediment to avoid negative impacts. However, the use of such an index has yet to be fully tested.Various data analysis techniques were used to explore how indices based on diatom assemblages (related to eutrophication and siltation), diatom species, the traits motility, and nutrient affinity responded to a gradient of percentage cover of fine sediment. Although diatom species showed marked variation in their affinity for percentage cover of fine sediment, the relationship between motility (both percent motile and the trait motility) and deposited fine sediment is not sufficiently strong to be used as a reliable indicator of fine sediment stress. We present an approach, which could potentially be used to develop a new index (diatom indicator of sediment conditions) on the basis of the response of diatoms to fine sediment, but caution that this index requires further development before use. Despite the hydromorphology having considerable potential to affect benthic diatoms, existing indices designed to assess eutrophication were robust to hydromorphological modification, reducing the possibility of false diagnosis of impacts.