Eider Irazoki

Mrs. Eider Irazoki

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 April 2020 in Frontiers in Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EIEider Irazoki
Eider Irazoki
LCLeslie María Contreras-Somoza
Leslie María Contreras-Somoza
José Miguel Toribio-GuzmánJosé Miguel Toribio-Guzmán
José Miguel Toribio-Guzmán
CJCristina Jenaro-Río
Cristina Jenaro-Río
HRHenriëtte van der Roest
Henriëtte van der Roest
Manuel Franco-MartinManuel Franco-Martin
Manuel Franco-Martin
Due to the growing number of older adults with cognitive impairment, it is essential to delay the onset and progression of cognitive decline and promote a healthy lifestyle. The rapid growth of technology has considerably advanced the field of computerized cognitive interventions. Consequently, traditional cognitive interventions are being adapted and new multimedia systems are being developed to encourage health and independent living in old age. The primary objective of this review was to identify cognitive stimulation, training and rehabilitation programs aimed at older people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. PsycINFO, Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science, PubMed, and CORDIS databases were searched from January 2008 to August 2018. Two researchers reviewed the potential studies individually for eligibility. Studies of computerized cognitive interventions for people with dementia and cognitive impairment were included if they clearly described objectives, users and functioning. A systematic review of the studies was carried out, providing a qualitative synthesis of the features and study characteristics of each software. Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria, and 11 different cognitive stimulation, training, and rehabilitation programs were identified. The studies found on cognitive intervention software indicate the existence of various technological programs for people with MCI and dementia. On the overall, the programs were aimed at people with different clinical conditions, able to create specific treatments and personalized training, optimized for portable devices, and user-friendly. However, the selected programs differ from each other in terms of objectives, usage mode and characteristics, even if they were used for the same purposes. Therefore, the information obtained in the review may be relevant to distinguish between programs and select the one that best suits each user. Thus, more information about the features and context of use is needed as well as more clinical studies to be able to compare among computerized cognitive programs.

19 February 2021 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EIEider Irazoki
Eider Irazoki
MGMª Cruz Sánchez Gómez
Mª Cruz Sánchez Gómez
LCLeslie María Contreras-Somoza
Leslie María Contreras-Somoza
José Miguel Toribio-GuzmánJosé Miguel Toribio-Guzmán
José Miguel Toribio-Guzmán
MMMaría-Victoria Martín-Cilleros
María-Victoria Martín-Cilleros
Manuel Franco-MartinManuel Franco-Martin
Manuel Franco-Martin
In recent years, technology has been implemented in the field of interventions for older adults. GRADIOR 4.5 is a cognitive software within the wide variety of available multimedia programs that support healthcare professionals in cognitive assessment and neuropsychological rehabilitation. The study aimed to evaluate the new version of GRADIOR (v4.5) based on the experience of people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), people with dementia (PWD), and healthcare professionals. A qualitative study using the focus group methodology was carried out involving 13 people with MCI, 13 PWD, and 11 healthcare professionals. An analysis of the content and the level of feedback was performed. The study showed that GRADIOR 4.5 might be sufficiently adapted to PWD and people with MCI. Participants were motivated to use GRADIOR 4.5, showed high acceptability of the software, and a positive attitude towards technology. However, healthcare professionals suggested significant improvements to the software. GRADIOR 4.5 appeared to be a promising intervention that, because of its positive experience and acceptability, could be systematically implemented to complement cognitive rehabilitation interventions for older adults with MCI and dementia. Finally, it is advisable to consider the suggestions gathered in this study for future developments.

12 February 2018 in Trials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MVMartina Vanova
Martina Vanova
EIEider Irazoki
Eider Irazoki
JGJ. Antonio García-Casal
J. Antonio García-Casal
Fernando Martínez-AbadFernando Martínez-Abad
Fernando Martínez-Abad
CBCristina Botella
Cristina Botella
Manuel Franco-MartinManuel Franco-Martin
Manuel Franco-Martin
Cognitive rehabilitation is a highly individualised, non-pharmacological intervention for people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia, which in recent years has also been developed for various IT platforms. In this study, we aim to evaluate the effectiveness of the cognitive rehabilitation software GRADIOR in a multi-centre, single-blinded randomised controlled trial with people with MCI and mild dementia. A total of 400 people with MCI and mild dementia will be randomly allocated to one of four groups. This trial will compare the cognitive rehabilitation treatment using the GRADIOR programme with a psychosocial stimulation intervention (PSS) using the ehcoBUTLER platform, with a combined treatment consisting of GRADIOR and ehcoBUTLER, and with a group receiving treatment as usual during a period of 1 year. The outcomes of this clinical trial will be to determine any relevant changes in cognition, mood, quality of life, activities of daily living and quality of patient-carer relationship after 4 months and 1 year of intervention in a cross-sectional group comparison. Participants will be followed-up for 1 year to investigate potential long-term effects of the conducted treatments. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN, ID: 15742788 . Registered on 12 June 2017.

16 March 2021 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABANGIE ALEJANDRA DIAZ BAQUERO
ANGIE ALEJANDRA DIAZ BAQUERO
RDRose-Marie Dröes
Rose-Marie Dröes
MBMaría V. Perea Bartolomé
María V. Perea Bartolomé
EIEider Irazoki
Eider Irazoki
José Miguel Toribio-GuzmánJosé Miguel Toribio-Guzmán
José Miguel Toribio-Guzmán
HRHenriëtte G. Van der Roest
Henriëtte G. Van der Roest
In recent years, different computer-based cognitive training (CT) programs for people with dementia (PwD) have been developed following a psychosocial approach. Aim: This systematic review aims to identify the methodological designs applied in the development of computer-based training (CCT) programs for the rehabilitation of cognitive functioning in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild dementia. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using the databases PubMed and PsycINFO. The search period was between 2000–2019. The study selection and data extraction processes were carried out by two independent reviewers. The protocol was registered in International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under registration number CRD42020159027. Results: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The most frequently used methodological design in the development of CCT programs for people with MCI or mild dementia was the user-centered design (UCD). This design involves an interactive system characterized by the inclusion of end users from the initial stages of its development, throughout the establishment of functional requirements, and in the evaluation of the program’s usability and user-experience (UX). Conclusion: UCD was the most used methodological design for the development of CCT programs although there was quite some variation in how this design was applied. Recommendations for future studies about the development of CCT programs for people with MCI and mild dementia are given. Central focus should be the inclusion and active participation of end users from the initial stages of development.

1 January 2017 in Revista De Neurologia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EIEider Irazoki
Eider Irazoki
JGJesús Antonio García-Casal
Jesús Antonio García-Casal
JSJulio Sánchez-Meca
Julio Sánchez-Meca
Manuel Franco-MartinManuel Franco-Martin
Manuel Franco-Martin
Reminiscence therapy is one of the most effective psychosocial interventions for people with dementia. To analyse the effectiveness of group reminiscence therapy in people with dementia and to check their involvement in the design and evaluation of the interventions. CINHAL, PubMed, Psicodoc and PsycINFO databases were searched for the period of 2004 to 2016. A systematic search was performed, as well as a quality assessment and a meta-analysis of the articles. The 14 studies selected had a moderate risk of bias. People with dementia who received group reminiscence therapy experienced an improvement in cognition (dMR = 0.26; 95% CI: 0.11-0.40; p = 0.0006; I2 = 0%) which was larger than the one observed in the control group (dc = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.11-0.63; p = 0.005; I2 = 0%). There was no improvement in mood, quality of life, behaviour or activities of daily living. People with dementia were not included in the design nor in the evaluation of the interventions. Group reminiscence therapy for people with dementia has favourable effects in cognition. There is a need for the inclusion of people with dementia in the design and planning of the interventions and for more randomised controlled trials.

LCLeslie María Contreras-Somoza
Leslie María Contreras-Somoza
José Miguel Toribio-GuzmánJosé Miguel Toribio-Guzmán
José Miguel Toribio-Guzmán
MGMª Cruz Sánchez Gómez
Mª Cruz Sánchez Gómez
EIEider Irazoki
Eider Irazoki
MMMaría-Victoria Martín-Cilleros
María-Victoria Martín-Cilleros
Manuel Franco-MartinManuel Franco-Martin
Manuel Franco-Martin
EhcoBUTLER is a tablet platform mainly aimed at the elderly with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to promote their well-being and health. The main objective of this study was to explore the perceptions and feedback level of the ehcoBUTLER potential users and stakeholders to improve its development. Through this exploration, the secondary objective was to contribute to the development of software/apps that promote their integral health. Focus groups were conducted (13 elderly with MCI, 13 with dementia, 12 caregivers, 11 professionals). The content and feedback level were analyzed. Participants liked the appearance of ehcoBUTLER, would like to use it, and were mainly interested in the emotional, healthy lifestyle, cognitive, and ergonomic tools. It is necessary to have prior training, more intuitive/customizable apps, low-price/free, offline/USB content, and add other activities/features. EhcoBUTLER is well-oriented to meet the needs and preferences of potential users. However, improvements in its usability, accessibility, and sustainability are needed. The participants’ perspectives provided a comprehensive view to improve ehcoBUTLER, so that in the future, it can benefit the elderly to be active agents in their health; support caregivers in their role and to have a respite; and professionals to have a multi-intervention platform. The present findings can contribute to the development of tablet software/apps that promote the integral well-being of this population.