It is known that nitric oxide (NO) plays a key physiological role in the control of gastrointestinal (GI) motor phenomena. In this respect, NO is considered as the main non-adrenergic, non-cholinergic (NANC) inhibitory neurotransmitter responsible for smooth muscle relaxation. Moreover, many substances (including hormones) have been reported to modulate NO production leading to changes in motor responses, further underlying the importance of this molecule in the control of GI motility. An impaired NO production/release has indeed been reported to be implicated in some GI dysmotility. In this article we wanted to focus on the influence of NO on gastric motility by summarizing knowledge regarding its role in both physiological and pathological conditions. The main role of NO on regulating gastric smooth muscle motor responses, with particular reference to NO synthases expression and signaling pathways, is discussed. A deeper knowledge of nitrergic mechanisms is important for a better understanding of their involvement in gastric pathophysiological conditions of hypo- or hyper-motility states and for future therapeutic approaches. A possible role of substances which, by interfering with NO production, could prove useful in managing such motor disorders has been advanced.

Orexin A (OXA) and orexin B (OXB) are recently discovered neuropeptides that appear to play a role in various distinct functions such as arousal and the sleep-wake cycle as well as on appetite and regulation of feeding and energy homeostasis. Orexins were first described as neuropeptides expressed by a specific population of neurons in the lateral hypothalamic area, a region classically implicated in feeding behaviour. Orexin neurons project to numerous brain regions, where orexin receptors have been shown to be widely distributed: both OXA and OXB act through two subtypes of receptors (OX1R and OX2R) that belong to the G protein-coupled superfamily of receptors. Growing evidence indicates that orexins act in the central nervous system also to regulate gastrointestinal functions: animal studies have indeed demonstrated that centrally-injected orexins or endogenously released orexins in the brain stimulates gastric secretion and influence gastrointestinal motility. The subsequent identification of orexins and their receptors in the enteric nervous system (including the myenteric and the submucosal plexuses) as well as in mucosa and smooth muscles has suggested that these neuropeptides may also play a local action. In this view, emerging studies indicate that orexins also exert region-specific contractile or relaxant effects on isolated gut preparations. The aim of the proposed review is to summarize both centrallyand peripherally-mediated actions of orexins on gastrointestinal functions and to discuss the related physiological role on the basis of the most recent findings.

The peptide hormone relaxin (RLX) has been shown to exert a variety of functions in both reproductive and non-reproductive tissues. The molecular mechanism of RLX on its target cells appears to involve multiple intracellular signalling systems, including the nitric oxide (NO) pathway. NO is an ubiquitous molecule synthesised from L-arginine under the catalytic action of different nitric oxide synthase (NOS) isoforms and its altered production has been reported to be involved in several diseases. RLX has been demonstrated to promote NO biosynthesis by up-regulating NOS expression; its influence on the different NOS appears to depend on the cell type studied. In addition to its physiological roles, RLX has been postulated as a potential therapeutic agent in several diseases. In particular, based on its property to promote NO biosynthesis, RLX may be regarded as a therapeutic tool in diseases characterized pathogenically by an impaired NO production. The aim of the present mini-review is to summarize and discuss the pathophysiological actions of RLX, strictly related to its ability to activate the endogenous NO pathway in reproductive and non-reproductive target organs.

Altered nitric oxide (NO) production/release is involved in gastrointestinal motor disorders occurring in dystrophic (mdx) mice. Since the hormone relaxin (RLX) can upregulate NO biosynthesis, its effects on spontaneous motility and NO synthase (NOS) expression in the ileum of dystrophic (mdx) mice were investigated. Mechanical responses of ileal preparations were recorded in vitro via force-displacement transducers. Evaluation of the expression of NOS isoforms was performed by immunohistochemistry and Western blot. Normal and mdx mice were distributed into three groups: untreated, RLX pretreated, and vehicle pretreated. Ileal preparations from the untreated animals showed spontaneous muscular contractions whose amplitude was significantly higher in mdx than in normal mice. Addition of RLX, alone or together with l-arginine, to the bath medium depressed the amplitude of the contractions in the mdx mice, thus reestablishing a motility pattern typical of the normal mice. The NOS inhibitor N^G-nitro-l-arginine (l-NNA) or the guanylate cyclase inhibitor ODQ reversed the effects of RLX. In RLX-pretreated mdx mice, the amplitude of spontaneous motility was reduced, thus resembling that of the normal mice, and NOS II expression in the muscle coat was increased in respect to the vehicle-pretreated mdx animals. These results indicate that RLX can reverse the altered ileal motility of mdx mice to a normal pattern, likely by upregulating NOS II expression and NO biosynthesis in the ileal smooth muscle.

Nitric oxide (NO) plays an important role in the cytotoxic mechanisms responsible for acute renal allograft rejection, where macrophages produce high levels of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). By contrast, both the source and the role of NO in chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) are still unclear. In this study, the expression of iNOS mRNA and protein was assessed in the kidneys of patients with graft failure due to chronic rejection. As controls, kidney specimens were obtained from patients undergoing nephrectomies for primary renal tumours, and from patients suffering from IgA nephropathy or mesangial‐proliferative glomerulonephritis. In normal kidneys, iNOS production was absent or limited to a low signal, while it was found only in the inflammatory infiltrate of kidneys affected by glomerulonephritis, as assessed by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization. In contrast, in CAN, iNOS protein was localized not only in inflammatory cells, but also in vascular, glomerular, and, more rarely, tubular structures. Accordingly, in situ hybridization localized iNOS mRNA in both macrophages and lymphocytes, as well as in vascular structures and glomeruli. Double immunostaining for iNOS and α‐smooth muscle actin (α‐SMA) or von Willebrand factor (vWf) revealed that smooth muscle cells were the main vascular source of iNOS, while both mesangial and inflammatory cells were immunostained at the glomerular level. These data demonstrate that macrophages and lymphocytes are not the only source of iNOS mRNA and protein in human CAN. Vascular smooth muscle and mesangial cells also synthesize iNOS, raising the question of heterogeneous regulation and function of iNOS in this disease. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.