Michael Dietze

Dr. Michael Dietze

Department of Earth & Environment, Boston University, 685 Commonwealth Ave Rm 130, Boston, MA, 02115, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 May 2020 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NMNate G. McDowell
Nate G. McDowell
CACraig D. Allen
Craig D. Allen
KAKristina Anderson-Teixeira
Kristina Anderson-Teixeira
BABrian H. Aukema
Brian H. Aukema
BBBen Bond-Lamberty
Ben Bond-Lamberty
CXChonggang Xu
Chonggang Xu
Shifting forest dynamics: Forest dynamics are the processes of recruitment, growth, death, and turnover of the constituent tree species of the forest community. These processes are driven by disturbances both natural and anthropogenic. McDowell et al. review recent progress in understanding the drivers of forest dynamics and how these are interacting and changing in the context of global climate change. The authors show that shifts in forest dynamics are already occurring, and the emerging pattern is that global forests are tending toward younger stands with faster turnover as old-growth forest with stable dynamics are dwindling. Science , this issue p. eaaz9463

18 September 2017 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RFRosie A. Fisher
Rosie A. Fisher
CKCharles D. Koven
Charles D. Koven
WAWilliam R. L. Anderegg
William R. L. Anderegg
BCBradley O. Christoffersen
Bradley O. Christoffersen
Michael DietzeMichael Dietze
Michael Dietze
PMPaul R. Moorcroft
Paul R. Moorcroft

29 April 2014 in Annual Review of Plant Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Michael DietzeMichael Dietze
Michael Dietze
ASAnna Sala
Anna Sala
MCMariah S. Carbone
Mariah S. Carbone
CCClaudia I. Czimczik
Claudia I. Czimczik
JMJoshua A. Mantooth
Joshua A. Mantooth
RVRodrigo Vargas
Rodrigo Vargas
Nonstructural carbon (NSC) provides the carbon and energy for plant growth and survival. In woody plants, fundamental questions about NSC remain unresolved: Is NSC storage an active or passive process? Do older NSC reserves remain accessible to the plant? How is NSC depletion related to mortality risk? Herein we review conceptual and mathematical models of NSC dynamics, recent observations and experiments at the organismal scale, and advances in plant physiology that have provided a better understanding of the dynamics of woody plant NSC. Plants preferentially use new carbon but can access decade-old carbon when the plant is stressed or physically damaged. In addition to serving as a carbon and energy source, NSC plays important roles in phloem transport, osmoregulation, and cold tolerance, but how plants regulate these competing roles and NSC depletion remains elusive. Moving forward requires greater synthesis of models and data and integration across scales from -omics to ecology.

27 September 2011 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ARAndrew Richardson
Andrew Richardson
RARyan S. Anderson
Ryan S. Anderson
MAM. Altaf Arain
M. Altaf Arain
ABAlan G. Barr
Alan G. Barr
GBGil Bohrer
Gil Bohrer
YXYongkang Xue
Yongkang Xue

30 January 2018 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Michael DietzeMichael Dietze
Michael Dietze
AFAndrew Fox
Andrew Fox
LBLindsay M. Beck-Johnson
Lindsay M. Beck-Johnson
JBJulio L. Betancourt
Julio L. Betancourt
MHMevin B. Hooten
Mevin B. Hooten
EWEthan P. White
Ethan P. White
Two foundational questions about sustainability are “How are ecosystems and the services they provide going to change in the future?” and “How do human decisions affect these trajectories?” Answering these questions requires an ability to forecast ecological processes. Unfortunately, most ecological forecasts focus on centennial-scale climate responses, therefore neither meeting the needs of near-term (daily to decadal) environmental decision-making nor allowing comparison of specific, quantitative predictions to new observational data, one of the strongest tests of scientific theory. Near-term forecasts provide the opportunity to iteratively cycle between performing analyses and updating predictions in light of new evidence. This iterative process of gaining feedback, building experience, and correcting models and methods is critical for improving forecasts. Iterative, near-term forecasting will accelerate ecological research, make it more relevant to society, and inform sustainable decision-making under high uncertainty and adaptive management. Here, we identify the immediate scientific and societal needs, opportunities, and challenges for iterative near-term ecological forecasting. Over the past decade, data volume, variety, and accessibility have greatly increased, but challenges remain in interoperability, latency, and uncertainty quantification. Similarly, ecologists have made considerable advances in applying computational, informatic, and statistical methods, but opportunities exist for improving forecast-specific theory, methods, and cyberinfrastructure. Effective forecasting will also require changes in scientific training, culture, and institutions. The need to start forecasting is now; the time for making ecology more predictive is here, and learning by doing is the fastest route to drive the science forward.

28 November 2016 in New Phytologist
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ARAlistair Rogers
Alistair Rogers
PMProfessor Belinda Medlyn
Professor Belinda Medlyn
JDJeffrey S. Dukes
Jeffrey S. Dukes
GBGordon Bonan
Gordon Bonan
SCSusanne von Caemmerer
Susanne von Caemmerer
SZSönke Zaehle
Sönke Zaehle
Summary: Accurate representation of photosynthesis in terrestrial biosphere models (TBMs) is essential for robust projections of global change. However, current representations vary markedly between TBMs, contributing uncertainty to projections of global carbon fluxes. Here we compared the representation of photosynthesis in seven TBMs by examining leaf and canopy level responses of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation (A) to key environmental variables: light, temperature, CO2 concentration, vapor pressure deficit and soil water content. We identified research areas where limited process knowledge prevents inclusion of physiological phenomena in current TBMs and research areas where data are urgently needed for model parameterization or evaluation. We provide a roadmap for new science needed to improve the representation of photosynthesis in the next generation of terrestrial biosphere and Earth system models.