To characterize inflammatory and mechanical changes in the collagenase-induced OA (CIOA) model in rats. Skeletally mature, 6-month-old Wistar rats received unilateral intraarticular injections of saline, 500 U or 1000 U of collagenase on days 0 and 2 of the study. Joint tissues were harvested on either day 4 or 70 to evaluate the acute and long-term changes. Blood biomarkers, gait asymmetry and mechanical hyperalgesia were assessed repeatedly up until day 70. The intraarticular injection of collagenase triggered an increase in cartilage degeneration and bone resorption over time, particularly for 1000 U. Similarly, mild synovitis was observed on day 70 with an increased number of synovial lining cells, increased fibrosis, and infiltration of peripheral macrophages. Mechanistically, these findings were linked to a dose-related mechanical weakening of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), which caused persistent joint destabilization throughout the study. Furthermore, the collagenase injection triggered acute inflammation and swelling of the synovium on day 4 and an acute systemic inflammatory response with increased cytokine and peripheral blood immune cell levels. While mild synovitis persisted until day 70, the systemic inflammatory response returned to control levels after 8 days. Similarly, the observed acute changes in gait and mechanical hyperalgesia also returned to baseline after 21 days. By evaluating inflammatory and mechanical factors at different doses and timepoints, our characterization enables a more targeted study design and increases the clinical relevance of future studies involving the CIOA model.

Purpose: The postoperative use of a rehabilitative knee brace after isolated primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) using a hamstring tendon (HT) autograft is controversial. A knee brace may provide subjective safety but can cause damage if applied incorrectly. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of a knee brace on clinical outcomes following isolated ACLR using HT autograft. Methods: In this prospective randomised trial, 114 adults (32.4 ± 11.5 years, 35.1% women) underwent isolated ACLR using HT autograft after primary ACL rupture. Patients were randomly assigned to wear either a knee brace (n = 58) or no brace (n = 56) for 6 weeks postoperatively. An initial examination was performed preoperatively, and at 6 weeks and 4, 6, and 12 months. The primary endpoint was the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score to measure participants’ subjective perceptions. Secondary endpoints included objective knee function assessed by IKDC, instrumented knee laxity measurements, isokinetic strength tests of the knee extensors and flexors, Lysholm Knee Score, Tegner Activity Score, Anterior Cruciate Ligament—Return to Sport after Injury Score, and quality of life determined by Short Form-36 (SF36). Results: There were no statistically significant or clinically meaningful differences in IKDC scores between the two study groups (3.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) −1.39 to 7.97, p = 0.03 for evidence of non-inferiority of brace-free compared with brace-based rehabilitation). The difference in Lysholm score was 3.20 (95% CI −2.47 to 8.87); the difference in SF36 physical component score 0.09 (95% CI −1.93 to 3.03). In addition, isokinetic testing did not reveal any clinically relevant differences between the groups (n.s.). Conclusions: Brace-free rehabilitation is non-inferior to a brace-based protocol regarding physical recovery 1 year after isolated ACLR using HT autograft. Consequently, the use of a knee brace might be avoided after such a procedure. Level of Evidence: Level I, therapeutic study.

Study Design: Retrospective database analysis. Objective: Polytraumatized patients with spinal injuries require tailor-made treatment plans. Severity of both spinal and concomitant injuries determine timing of spinal surgery. Aim of this study was to evaluate the role of spinal injury localization, severity and concurrent injury patterns on timing of surgery and subsequent outcome. Methods: The TraumaRegister DGU ^® was utilized and patients, aged ≥16 years, with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥16 and diagnosed with relevant spinal injuries (abbreviated injury scale, AIS ≥ 3) were selected. Concurrent spinal and non-spinal injuries were analysed and the relation between injury severity, concurrent injury patterns and timing of spinal surgery was determined. Results: 12.596 patients with a mean age of 50.8 years were included. 7.2% of patients had relevant multisegmental spinal injuries. Furthermore, 50% of patients with spine injuries AIS ≥3 had a more severe non-spinal injury to another body part. ICU and hospital stay were superior in patients treated within 48 hrs for lumbar and thoracic spinal injuries. In cervical injuries early intervention (<48 hrs) was associated with increased mortality rates (9.7 vs 6.3%). Conclusions: The current multicentre study demonstrates that polytrauma patients frequently sustain multiple spinal injuries, and those with an index spine injury may therefore benefit from standardized whole-spine imaging. Moreover, timing of surgical spinal surgery and outcome appear to depend on the severity of concomitant injuries and spinal injury localization. Future prospective studies are needed to identify trauma characteristics that are associated with improved outcome upon early or late spinal surgery.

Purpose: The direct anterior approach (DAA) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has a risk of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) injury. Long-term outcomes and therapeutic options for such injuries are poorly investigated. This study evaluates the impact of iatrogenic LFCN lesions on long-term outcomes and investigates treatments like ultrasound-guided nerve infiltration or neurolysis. Methods: Our institutional database of primary THAs (2014–2022) was searched for patients with iatrogenic LFCN lesions after DAA, confirmed via ultrasound or electroneurography. First, retrospective analysis of the effects of ultrasound-guided nerve infiltration and neurolysis. Second, clinical-radiological assessment of pain, function, incision, and affected skin area. Patient-reported outcomes (OHS, COMI Hip, UCLA) were compared to a matched non-LFCN injury control group. Results: Of 8136 patients, 29 (0.36%) met inclusion criteria, with 22 undergoing ultrasound diagnostics. Eighteen received nerve infiltration (improvement after one (n = 7), two (n = 3) or three (n = 1) infiltrations), and two had neurolysis. After a mean follow-up of 4.95 years, 13 patients were assessed. Common symptoms included hypesthaesia (11), dysesthesia (6), and tingling (3), with a mean affected area of 253cm² ± 64.8. 24-months questionnaires for the LFCN group (OHS 39.2 ± 8.6, COMI Hip 2.4 ± 2.7, UCLA 6.5 ± 1.6) were worse than the control group (OHS 46.2 ± 2.3, COMI Hip 0.6 ± 0.8, UCLA 7.2 ± 1.5), though differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Instrumentally proven LFCN lesions after DAA THA are rare but lead to worse long-term outcomes. Ultrasound-guided nerve infiltration shows favorable results for symptom management.

Background and Objectives: Chondral and osteochondral lesions can lead to osteoarthritis if untreated, making accurate assessment of cartilage repair outcomes essential for optimizing treatment strategies. The objective of this study was to compare MOCART and MOCART 2.0 and to evaluate the clinical utility of both across different surgical cartilage repair techniques and various time points. Material and Methods: This study included 111 patients (age: 35 ± 10, 35% female) who underwent cartilage repair surgery of the knee between September 2015 and March 2022. A total of 188 postoperative magnetic resonance images were evaluated using MOCART and MOCART 2.0. The correlations between both scores, as well as to the change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), were determined. Results: MOCART 2.0 scores (66 ± 13) were significantly higher than MOCART scores (58 ± 13, p < 0.001). Positive correlation was observed between scoring systems (r = 0.837, p < 0.001). There was no significant correlation between MOCART or MOCART 2.0 scores and the change in PROMs. Noticeably, there was a statistically significant correlation between both MOCART and MOCART 2.0 in the AutoCart subgroup across multiple timepoints for the change in PROMs. Conclusions: Based on radiographic–clinical outcome discordance, clinicians should not rely solely on MOCART or MOCART 2.0 scores when evaluating cartilage repair success but instead prioritize patient-reported functional improvements while using imaging as a complementary assessment tool.