Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the COVID-19 vaccination acceptance of emergency medical services (EMS) personnel as front-line health care workers (HCW) in Germany. Several studies have shown low willingness for vaccination (e.g., seasonal influenza) among HCWs and EMS personnel. Methods: We created a web-based survey. The questions were closed and standardized. Demographic data were collected (age, sex, federal state, profession). Experience with own COVID-19 infection, or infection in personal environment (family, friends) as well as willingness to vaccinate was queried. Results: The sample includes n = 1296 participants. A willingness to be vaccinated exists in 57%, 27.6% participants were undecided. Our results show a higher propensity to vaccinate among the following groups: male gender, higher medical education level, older age, own burden caused by the pandemic (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Due to the low overall acceptance of vaccination by HCWs, we recommend that the groups with vaccination hesitancy, in particular, be recruited for vaccination through interventions such as continuing education and awareness campaigns.

Purpose: The postoperative use of a rehabilitative knee brace after isolated primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) using a hamstring tendon (HT) autograft is controversial. A knee brace may provide subjective safety but can cause damage if applied incorrectly. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of a knee brace on clinical outcomes following isolated ACLR using HT autograft. Methods: In this prospective randomised trial, 114 adults (32.4 ± 11.5 years, 35.1% women) underwent isolated ACLR using HT autograft after primary ACL rupture. Patients were randomly assigned to wear either a knee brace (n = 58) or no brace (n = 56) for 6 weeks postoperatively. An initial examination was performed preoperatively, and at 6 weeks and 4, 6, and 12 months. The primary endpoint was the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score to measure participants’ subjective perceptions. Secondary endpoints included objective knee function assessed by IKDC, instrumented knee laxity measurements, isokinetic strength tests of the knee extensors and flexors, Lysholm Knee Score, Tegner Activity Score, Anterior Cruciate Ligament—Return to Sport after Injury Score, and quality of life determined by Short Form-36 (SF36). Results: There were no statistically significant or clinically meaningful differences in IKDC scores between the two study groups (3.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) −1.39 to 7.97, p = 0.03 for evidence of non-inferiority of brace-free compared with brace-based rehabilitation). The difference in Lysholm score was 3.20 (95% CI −2.47 to 8.87); the difference in SF36 physical component score 0.09 (95% CI −1.93 to 3.03). In addition, isokinetic testing did not reveal any clinically relevant differences between the groups (n.s.). Conclusions: Brace-free rehabilitation is non-inferior to a brace-based protocol regarding physical recovery 1 year after isolated ACLR using HT autograft. Consequently, the use of a knee brace might be avoided after such a procedure. Level of Evidence: Level I, therapeutic study.

(1) Background: Approximately 73 countries worldwide implemented a daylight saving time (DST) policy: setting their clocks forward in spring and back in fall. The main purpose of this practice is to save electricity. The aim of the present study was to find out how DST affects the incidence and impact of seriously injured patients. (2) Methods: In a retrospective, multi-center study, we used the data recorded in the TraumaRegister DGU^® (TR-DGU) between 2003 and 2017 from Germany, Switzerland, and Austria. We compared the included cases 1 week before and after DST. (3) Results: After DST from standard time to summertime, we found an increased incidence of accidents of motorcyclists up to 51.58%. The result is consistent with other studies. (4) Conclusion: However, our results should be interpreted as a tendency. Other influencing factors, such as time of day and weather conditions, were not considered.

Background: The lateral ankle sprain (LAS) is the most common injury in the field of everyday and sports-related activities. There is a high rate of patients with LAS who will develop chronic ankle instability (CAI). A possible explanation for this high rate is an insufficient rehabilitation and/or a premature return to intense exercise and workloads. Currently, there are general rehabilitation guidelines for LAS but there is a lack of standardized evidenced-based rehabilitation concepts for LAS, which effectively reduce the high CAI rate. The primary aim of the study is to investigate the effectiveness of a 6-week sensorimotor training intervention (SMART-Treatment, SMART) in contrast to standard therapy (Normal Treatment, NORMT) after an acute LAS on perceived ankle joint function. Methods: This study will be a prospective, single-center, interventional randomized controlled trial with an active control group. Patients (14–41 years) with an acute LAS and a MRI confirmed lesion or rupture of at least one ankle ligament will be included. Exclusion criteria are acute concomitant injuries of the ankle, pre-injuries of the ankle, serious lower-extremity injuries of the last 6 months, lower-extremity surgery, and neurological diseases. The primary outcome measure will be the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT). Secondary outcomes include the Foot and Ankle Ability Measurement (FAAM), isokinetic and isometric strength diagnostics, joint repositioning sense, range of motion, measurements of postural control, gait and run analysis, and jump analysis. This protocol will follow the SPIRIT guidance. Discussion: Current management of LAS rehabilitation lacks since there is a high rate of patients developing a CAI. It has been shown that exercise therapy improves ankle function in acute LAS as well as in patients with CAI. It is further recommended to address specific impairment domains in ankle rehabilitation. However, empirical data for such a holistic treatment algorithm is missing. Therefore, this study has the potential to improve the healthcare for LAS patients and might be used for a future standardized evidence-based rehabilitation concept. Trial registration: “Prospectively registered” ISRCTN – ISRCTN13640422 17/11/2021; DRKS (German Clinical Trials Register) – DRKS00026049.

Background: Healthcare workers (HCWs) in hospitals are at high risk during the COVID-19 pandemic. Healthcare workers’ infection risk could be amplified during the ongoing pandemic due to various factors, including continuous exposure to patients and inadequate infection control training. Despite the risk healthcare workers face, vaccine hesitancy remains a global challenge. Differences in acceptance rates have ranged from less than 55% (in Russia) to nearly 90% (in China). In order to improve our knowledge of vaccine acceptance and its variation in rates, an evaluation is warranted. A survey was thus administered to healthcare workers. Methods: This survey aimed to address vaccination acceptance among employees in an urban level 1 trauma hospital. It was conducted through a developed and structured questionnaire that was randomly distributed online among the staff (age ≥18 years) to receive their feedback. Results: Among 285 participants (out of 995 employees), 69% were female, and 83.5% were overaged more than 30 years of age. The two largest groups were nurses (32%) and doctors (22%). The majority of respondents reported that they would “like to be vaccinated” (77.4%) and that they trusted the COVID-19 vaccine (62%). Moreover, 67.8% also reported that they felt the vaccination was effective. They reported that vaccination was a method to prevent the spread of COVID-19 (85.15%) and was a way to protect individuals with weak immune systems (78.2%). More importantly, the participants were concerned about other people (80.1%) and believed the vaccine would protect others. On the other hand, the result showed that the majority of participants (95.3%) chose to be vaccinated once everyone else was vaccinated, “I don’t need to get vaccinated”. Results showed that the majority of participants that chose “I don’t need to get vaccinated” did so after everyone else was vaccinated. Our results show that COVID-19 vaccination intention in a level 1 trauma hospital was associated with older age males who are more confident, and also share a collective responsibility, are less complacent, and have fewer constraints. Conclusion: Acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine is relatively low among healthcare workers (HCWs). Differences in vaccine acceptance have been noted between different categories of HCWs and genders. Therefore, addressing barriers to vaccination acceptance among these HCWs is essential to avoid reluctance to receive the vaccination, but it will be challenging.

Im Rahmen der präklinischen Versorgung von schwer verletzten Patienten wird der Nutzen einer Transfusion von Erythrozytenkonzentraten (EK) schon am Unfallort diskutiert. Hierbei kommt der Luftrettung hinsichtlich Vorhaltung und Transport eine erhebliche Bedeutung zu. Unklar ist, ob die Vibrationen im Hubschrauber eine Hämolyse induzieren und so eine richtlinienkonforme und damit sichere Anwendung verhindern könnten. Ziel dieser Untersuchung ist es, die Hämolyseraten von standardmäßig gelagerten mit denen in einem Hubschrauber transportierten EK zu vergleichen. Es erfolgte die Herstellung von identischen Paaren von EK. Während die EK der Kontrollgruppe richtlinienkonform gelagert wurden, erfolgte für die EK der Interventionsgruppe die Mitnahme im Hubschrauber während Realeinsätzen. Danach erfolgte die Bestimmung der Hämolyserate zu 3 verschiedenen Zeitpunkten. In beiden Gruppen ließ sich ein Anstieg der Hämolyserate über die Zeit nachweisen, was dem üblichen Alterungsprozess der Erythrozytenkonzentrate entspricht. Alle Werte blieben deutlich unter der von der Richtlinie geforderten maximalen Hämolyserate. Ein relevanter Unterschied zwischen beiden Gruppen ließ sich zu keinem Zeitpunkt zeigen. Ein sicherer Transport von EK im Rettungshubschrauber hinsichtlich der Qualität im Sinne einer im Rahmen liegenden Hämolyserate und damit die Voraussetzung zu deren sicherer Anwendung im präklinischen Setting ist daher problemlos möglich. As part of the preclinical care of severely injured patients the benefits of a transfusion of packed red blood cells (pRBC) is currently being discussed. In this context, air rescue is of importance with regard to storage and transfer. It is unclear whether the vibrations of the helicopter could cause hemolysis and prevent a directive-compliant and safe application. The aim of this study is to compare the hemolysis rates of conventionally stored pRBC with those transported in a helicopter. Identical pairs of pRBC were prepared. While the pRBC of the control group were stored in accordance with the applicable guidelines, the pRBC of the intervention group were stored in a rescue helicopter and carried along during actual missions. Thereafter, the hemolysis rate was calculated at three different points in time. In both groups an increase in the rate of hemolysis was detected over time, which corresponds to the usual aging process of the pRBC. All values remained well below the maximum hemolysis rate which is mandated by the german guideline. A relevant difference between both groups could not be determined. The safe transport of pRBC in a rescue helicopter, with regard to the quality of the preparations in terms of an underlying hemolysis rate, and thus the condition for their use in the treatment of acute hemorrhage in the preclinical setting, is therefore possible.