Sclerostin serum levels are increased in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Osteoporosis and CKD often occur simultaneously. Currently antisclerostin antibodies are in clinical development for the treatment of osteoporosis. The objective of this study was to study the renal handling of sclerostin. This was a cross-sectional study. The study was conducted at a university hospital and outpatient renal clinic. One hundred twenty men and women with CKD stage 1-5 participated in the study. Measurements of sclerostin in urine and serum (ELISA), renal function [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)], electrolytes, α1-microglobulin, PTH, vitamin D, and markers of bone turnover were conducted. Eight human kidney biopsies were stained for sclerostin using immunohistochemistry. Urinary excretion of sclerostin was measured. Urinary sclerostin excretion increased with declining eGFR (R=-0.75, P<.001), from 10.4 (±12.7) pmol/L in patients with eGFR greater than 90 mL/min per 1.73 m2 (CKD stage 1) to 117.9 (±65.4) pmol/L in patients with eGFR less than 15 mL/min per 1.73 m2 (CKD stage 5, P<.001). Fractional excretion of sclerostin increased with declining eGFR (R=-0.83, P<.001) from 0.45% (±0.6%) in CKD 1 to 26.3% (±17.6%) in CKD 5 (P<.001). Fractional excretion of sclerostin correlated with fractional excretion of α1-microglobulin (R=0.82, P<.001). No association between serum sclerostin and fractional excretion of phosphorus was found in a multivariate analysis. Sclerostin was detected in proximal tubular cells, showing a diffuse cytoplasmic staining pattern. Increased sclerostin serum levels in CKD patients are not due to decreased renal elimination. On the contrary, renal elimination increases with declining kidney function. Whether this has consequences on antisclerostin antibody dosing, efficacy, or safety in patients with CKD remains to be determined.

The plasma soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is a biomarker for focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), but its value is under discussion because of ambiguous results arising from different ELISA methods in previous studies. The aim of this study was to compare diagnostic performance of two leading suPAR ELISA kits and examine four objectives in 146 subjects: (1) plasma suPAR levels according to glomerular disease (primary, secondary and recurrent FSGS after kidney transplantation, other glomerulonephritis) and in healthy controls; (2) suPAR levels based on glomerular filtration rate; (3) sensitivity and specificity of suPAR for FSGS diagnosis and determination of optimal cut-offs; (4) suPAR as prognostic tool. Patients with FSGS showed significant higher suPAR values than patients with other glomerulonephritis and healthy individuals. This applied to subjects with and without chronic kidney disease. Although both suPARnostic™ assay and Quantikine Human uPAR ELISA Kit exerted high sensitivity and specificity for FSGS diagnosis, their cut-off values of 4.644 ng/mL and 2.789 ng/mL were significantly different. Higher suPAR was furthermore predictive for progression to end-stage renal disease. In summary, suPAR values must be interpreted in the context of population and test methods used. Knowing test specific cut-offs makes suPAR a valuable biomarker for FSGS.