Pieter Vanneste

Mr. Pieter Vanneste


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 July 2020 in Cognition, Technology & Work
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PVPieter Vanneste
Pieter Vanneste
ARAnnelies Raes
Annelies Raes
JMJessica Morton
Jessica Morton
KBKlaas Bombeke
Klaas Bombeke
BABram B. Van Acker
Bram B. Van Acker
WNWim Van Den Noortgate
Wim Van Den Noortgate

1 November 2020 in International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PVPieter Vanneste
Pieter Vanneste
YHYi Huang
Yi Huang
JPJung Yeon Park
Jung Yeon Park
FCFrederik Cornillie
Frederik Cornillie
BDBart Decloedt
Bart Decloedt
WNWim Van Den Noortgate
Wim Van Den Noortgate

1 February 2021 in Mathematics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PVPieter Vanneste
Pieter Vanneste
José OramasJosé Oramas
José Oramas
Thomas VerelstThomas Verelst
Thomas Verelst
TTTinne Tuytelaars
Tinne Tuytelaars
Annelies RaesAnnelies Raes
Annelies Raes
WNWim Van Den Noortgate
Wim Van Den Noortgate
Computer vision has shown great accomplishments in a wide variety of classification, segmentation and object recognition tasks, but tends to encounter more difficulties when tasks require more contextual assessment. Measuring the engagement of students is an example of such a complex task, as it requires a strong interpretative component. This research describes a methodology to measure students’ engagement, taking both an individual (student-level) and a collective (classroom) approach. Results show that students’ individual behaviour, such as note-taking or hand-raising, is challenging to recognise, and does not correlate with students’ self-reported engagement. Interestingly, students’ collective behaviour can be quantified in a more generic way using measures for students’ symmetry, reaction times and eye-gaze intersections. Nonetheless, the evidence for a connection between these collective measures and engagement is rather weak. Although this study does not succeed in providing a proxy of students’ self-reported engagement, our approach sheds light on the needs for future research. More concretely, we suggest that not only the behavioural, but also the emotional and cognitive component of engagement should be captured.

16 June 2019 in EDEN Conference Proceedings
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Annelies RaesAnnelies Raes
Annelies Raes
PVPieter Vanneste
Pieter Vanneste
MPMarieke Pieters
Marieke Pieters
IWIne Windey
Ine Windey
WNWim Van Den Noortgate
Wim Van Den Noortgate
Fien DepaepeFien Depaepe
Fien Depaepe
Based on current societal transitions and in the context of lifelong learning, both upper secondary education, higher education and vocational training are invited to think about how to enable people, at any stage of their life, to take part in stimulating learning experiences. The expectancy to be present at one core location is getting more and more difficult in this (inter)national society. In addition, the student population is changing and balancing work and family life becomes an important point of priority. Therefore, it is important to make education less dependent on location and time and improve flexibility within the learning trajectory (Lakhal, De Sherbrooke, & Bateman, 2017). Next to this, there are growing insights about the need to collaborate.