Annelies Raes

Dr. Annelies Raes

KU Leuven imec research group itec, Belgium
+2
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 November 2019 in Learning Environments Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Annelies RaesAnnelies Raes
Annelies Raes
LDLoulou Detienne
Loulou Detienne
IWIne Windey
Ine Windey
Fien DepaepeFien Depaepe
Fien Depaepe

1 January 2020 in Computers & Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Annelies RaesAnnelies Raes
Annelies Raes
PVPieter Vanneste
Pieter Vanneste
MPMarieke Pieters
Marieke Pieters
IWIne Windey
Ine Windey
WNWim Van Den Noortgate
Wim Van Den Noortgate
Fien DepaepeFien Depaepe
Fien Depaepe

18 November 2021 in Postdigital Science and Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Annelies RaesAnnelies Raes
Annelies Raes


1 February 2021 in Mathematics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PVPieter Vanneste
Pieter Vanneste
José OramasJosé Oramas
José Oramas
Thomas VerelstThomas Verelst
Thomas Verelst
TTTinne Tuytelaars
Tinne Tuytelaars
Annelies RaesAnnelies Raes
Annelies Raes
WNWim Van Den Noortgate
Wim Van Den Noortgate
Computer vision has shown great accomplishments in a wide variety of classification, segmentation and object recognition tasks, but tends to encounter more difficulties when tasks require more contextual assessment. Measuring the engagement of students is an example of such a complex task, as it requires a strong interpretative component. This research describes a methodology to measure students’ engagement, taking both an individual (student-level) and a collective (classroom) approach. Results show that students’ individual behaviour, such as note-taking or hand-raising, is challenging to recognise, and does not correlate with students’ self-reported engagement. Interestingly, students’ collective behaviour can be quantified in a more generic way using measures for students’ symmetry, reaction times and eye-gaze intersections. Nonetheless, the evidence for a connection between these collective measures and engagement is rather weak. Although this study does not succeed in providing a proxy of students’ self-reported engagement, our approach sheds light on the needs for future research. More concretely, we suggest that not only the behavioural, but also the emotional and cognitive component of engagement should be captured.

7 August 2019 in Education and Information Technologies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Annelies RaesAnnelies Raes
Annelies Raes
Fien DepaepeFien Depaepe
Fien Depaepe