Migraine continues second among the world's causes of disability. Diagnosis is based on the history and clinical examination and imaging is usually not necessary. Migraine can be subdivided depending on whether there is an aura or not and based on the frequency of the headaches. The number of headache days determines whether the patient has episodic migraine or chronic migraine. Treating migraines can be done to treatment the migraine itself and to prevent its appearance. In this review we approach the migraine from a practical point of view with updated information.

Occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) is a surgical treatment proposed for drug-resistant chronic cluster headache (drCCH). Long-term series assessing its efficacy are scarce. We designed a retrospective observational study with consecutive sampling, evaluating the follow-up of 17 drCCH patients who underwent ONS. Our main endpoint was the reduction the rate of attacks per week. We also evaluated the pain intensity through the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), patient overall perceived improvement and decrease in oral medication intake. After a median follow-up of 6.0 years (4.5–9.0), patients decreased from a median of 30 weekly attacks to 22.5 (5.6–37.5, p = 0.012), 7.5 at 1 year (p = 0.006) and 15.0 at the end of follow-up (p = 0.041). The VAS decreased from a median of 10.0 to 8.0 (p = 0.011) at three months, to 7.0 (p = 0.008) at twelve months and 7.0 (p = 0.003) at the end of the follow-up. A total of 23.5% had an overall perceived improvement of ≥70% at 3 months, 41.2% at 1 year and 27.8% at the end of follow-up. Reducing prophylactic oral medication was possible in 76.5% and it was stopped in 17.7%. Triptan use decreased in all the responder patients and 17.7% stopped its intake. A total of 41.2% presented mild adverse events. In conclusion, our long-term experience suggests that ONS could be an interesting option for drCCH-selected patients, as it is a beneficial and minimally invasive procedure with no serious adverse events.

Background: Preclinical evidence supports the immunoregulatory role of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in migraine pathophysiology. The increasing use of anti-CGRP therapies in patients with migraine and other comorbidities raises the question whether the potential use of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (CGRP-mAbs) therapies in combination with other immunological therapies is effective and safe. Methods: This multicenter study included patients with migraine receiving CGRP-mAbs combined with immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory treatments. Clinical and demographic data, treatment history, laboratory markers and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were analyzed. Effectiveness outcomes included the change in monthly migraine days (MMD) and monthly headache days (MHD) at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, alongside the > 50% response rate. Moreover, autoimmune disease progression was also evaluated. We explored differences between patients with and without autoimmune disease activation. Results: Among 89 patients, there were 80 (90%) females with a mean age of 50 years (SD: 11), who had a high prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities (anxiety 44%, depression 49%) and medication overuse (68%). Patients receiving immunological treatments experienced significant reductions in MMD and MHD, with MMD decreasing from 16 (SD: 7) at baseline to 9 (SD: 8) at 6 months, and MHD dropping from 23 (SD: 8) to 17 (SD: 11). A 50% response in MMD was achieved by 46% at 6 months. TEAEs were reported in 28%, most commonly constipation (16%) and dizziness (9%). Conclusions: CGRP-mAbs therapies combined with immunological treatments appear effective and safe in patients with autoimmune diseases. Larger prospective studies are necessary to confirm these findings and optimize management strategies.

We analyzed the inter- and intra-examiner reliability of Werium inertial sensors and the cervical range of motion (CROM) instrument for the measurement of active CROM (AcROM) in patients with primary headache. Another objective is to analyze the validity of the inertial sensors (Werium). The literature has reported symptomatology features in patients diagnosed with primary headache similar to that of patients with cervicogenic headache. The International Classification of Headache (ICHD-III) established the presence of reduced AcROM as a diagnostic criterion for cervicogenic headache. Several instruments are used for this measurement, with limitations in their applicability in daily clinical practice. A prospective longitudinal repeated measures study was conducted to assess the intra- and inter-rater reliability and validity of Werium inertial sensors in 20 adults with chronic primary headache. For the inter-rater analysis, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values were above 0.75 for all movements, indicating a good level of reliability. For the intra-rater results, the ICC values obtained by the Werium inertial sensors for all cervical movements were good for rater A (ICC >0.80) and rater B (ICC >0.84). For the validity, the ICCs obtained by the Werium inertial sensors compared with the CROM instrument for all cervical movements were moderate for both raters (ICC > 0.70, respectively). Values obtained in the standard error of measurement, minimum detectable change at 90% and limits of agreement also indicated good agreement. Werium inertial sensors have shown good to excellent reliability results, both intra- and inter-examiner (ICC > 0.75). Likewise, when the sensors were compared with another validated instrument (CROM device) they obtained high reliability results (ICC > 0.70). These results plus its relatively low price and ease of use allow us to recommend it in daily clinical practice to measure AcROM in patients with chronic primary headache.

Interictal burden (IB), defined as the symptoms and impairments that occur between migraine attacks, including cognitive dysfunction, photophobia, and fatigue, is recognized as a significant determinant of quality of life in patients. A prospective observational study was conducted. Patients diagnosed with chronic migraine (CM) and under treatment with OnabotulinumtoxinA (OnabotA) according to the PREEMPT protocol (every 12 weeks) were assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the change in the IB measured with the Migraine Interictal Burden Scale (MIBS-4) and in the monthly migraine days (MMD). The secondary endpoint was acute medication use. This single-center study included 150 patients (91.3% female; median age 44 years). MIBS-4 scores were decreased by 29.1% at 3 months (8.47 to 5.97) and by 41.6% at 12 months (to 4.86; p < 0.001). IB-free status was achieved by 16 patients (10.7%). The most disabling baseline symptoms were photophobia (37%), fatigue (20%), and allodynia (18%), which reduced by 52%, 43%, and 39% at 12 months, respectively. MMD were reduced from 18.6 to 8.3 days at 12 months and triptan and analgesic intake decreased by 58.7% and 55.4%. OnabotA significantly reduced both IB and migraine frequency over 12 months, underscoring its relevance in CM management.