Kosei Aikawa

Dr. Kosei Aikawa

Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaidō, Japan
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2020 in Minerals Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KAKosei Aikawa
Kosei Aikawa
MIMayumi Ito
Mayumi Ito
TSTatsuya Segawa
Tatsuya Segawa
SJSanghee Jeon
Sanghee Jeon
IPIlhwan Park
Ilhwan Park
NHNaoki Hiroyoshi
Naoki Hiroyoshi

19 July 2023 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PJPongsiri Julapong
Pongsiri Julapong
ANApisit Numprasanthai
Apisit Numprasanthai
LTLadda Tangwattananukul
Ladda Tangwattananukul
OJOnchanok Juntarasakul
Onchanok Juntarasakul
PSPalot Srichonphaisarn
Palot Srichonphaisarn
Theerayut PhengsaartTheerayut Phengsaart
Theerayut Phengsaart
Rare earth minerals (REMs) contain rare earth elements (REEs) that are important in modern technologies due to their unique magnetic, phosphorescent, and catalytic properties. However, REMs are not only non-renewable resources but also non-uniformly distributed on the Earth’s crust, so the processing of REE-bearing secondary resources via recycling is one potential route to ensure the long-term sustainability of REE supply. Flotation—a method that separates materials based on differences in their surface wettability—is a process applied for both mineral processing and recycling of REEs, especially when the particles are fine and/or a high-purity product is required. In this review, studies about rare earth flotation from 2012 to 2021 were systematically reviewed using the PRISMA guideline. It was found that most REM flotation research works focused on finding better collectors and depressants while, for recycling, studies on advanced flotation techniques like froth flotation, ion flotation, solvent sublation, electroflotation, and adsorbing colloid flotation with an emphasis on the recovery of dissolved REEs from aqueous solutions dominated.

25 March 2022 in Minerals Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMuhammad Bilal
Muhammad Bilal
MIMayumi Ito
Mayumi Ito
RARiku Akishino
Riku Akishino
XBXiangning Bu
Xiangning Bu
FHFawad Ul Hassan
Fawad Ul Hassan
NHNaoki Hiroyoshi
Naoki Hiroyoshi

2 February 2021 in Metals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KAKosei Aikawa
Kosei Aikawa
MIMayumi Ito
Mayumi Ito
AKAtsuhiro Kusano
Atsuhiro Kusano
Ilhwan ParkIlhwan Park
Ilhwan Park
TOTatsuya Oki
Tatsuya Oki
NHNaoki Hiroyoshi
Naoki Hiroyoshi
The purpose of this study is to propose the flotation procedure of seafloor massive sulfide (SMS) ores to separate chalcopyrite and galena as froth and sphalerite, pyrite, and other gangue minerals as tailings, which is currently facing difficulties due to the presence of water-soluble compounds. The obtained SMS ore sample contains CuFeS2, ZnS, FeS2, SiO2, and BaSO4 in addition to PbS and PbSO4 as Pb minerals. Soluble compounds releasing Pb, Zn2+, Pb2+, and Fe2+/3+ are also contained. When anglesite co-exists, lead activation of sphalerite occurred, and thus sphalerite was recovered together with chalcopyrite as froth. To remove soluble compounds (e.g., anglesite) that have detrimental effects on the separation efficiency of chalcopyrite and sphalerite, surface cleaning pretreatment using ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA) was applied before flotation. Although most of anglesite were removed and the recovery of chalcopyrite was improved from 19% to 81% at 20 g/t potassium amyl xanthate (KAX) after EDTA washing, the floatability of sphalerite was not suppressed. When zinc sulfate was used as a depressant for sphalerite after EDTA washing, the separation efficiency of chalcopyrite and sphalerite was improved due to deactivation of lead-activated sphalerite by zinc sulfate. The proposed flotation procedure of SMS ores—a combination of surface cleaning with EDTA to remove anglesite and the depression of lead-activated sphalerite by using zinc sulfate—could achieve the highest separation efficiency of chalcopyrite and sphalerite; that is, at 200 g/t KAX, the recoveries of chalcopyrite and sphalerite were 86% and 17%, respectively.

18 September 2023 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Theerayut PhengsaartTheerayut Phengsaart
Theerayut Phengsaart
PJPongsiri Julapong
Pongsiri Julapong
CMChaiwat Manositchaikul
Chaiwat Manositchaikul
PSPalot Srichonphaisarn
Palot Srichonphaisarn
MRMonthicha Rawangphai
Monthicha Rawangphai
MIMayumi Ito
Mayumi Ito
Material recycling and thermal treatment are the two most common recycling methods employed for plastic waste management. Thermal treatment for energy recovery is more widely applied compared with material recycling because the latter requires a high efficiency of separation and a high purity of products. Unfortunately, certain plastics like polyvinyl chloride (PVC) are unsuitable for thermal treatment because they contain additives like chloride (Cl−) that have adverse effects on refractory materials used in boilers. As a result of this, mixed plastic wastes containing PVC generally end up in landfills. PVC-bearing mixed plastics, however, remain valuable resources as championed by the United Nation Sustainable Development Goals (UN-SDGs): Goal 12 “Responsible production and consumption”, and their recycling after the removal of PVC is important. In this paper, recent studies (2012–2021) related to the separation of PVC from other types of plastics were systematically reviewed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A total of 66 articles were selected, reviewed, and summarized. The results showed that various separation technologies conventionally applied to mineral processing—selective comminution, gravity separation, magnetic separation, electrical separation, and flotation—have been studied for PVC separation, and the majority of these works (>60%) focused on flotation. In addition, more advanced technologies including sorting and density-surface-based separation were introduced between 2019 and 2021.

6 June 2022 in Minerals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KAKosei Aikawa
Kosei Aikawa
MIMayumi Ito
Mayumi Ito
AKAtsuhiro Kusano
Atsuhiro Kusano
S*Sanghee *Jeon
Sanghee *Jeon
Ilhwan ParkIlhwan Park
Ilhwan Park
NHNaoki Hiroyoshi
Naoki Hiroyoshi
The presence of anglesite (PbSO4) in complex sulfide ores negatively affects the separation of Cu-Pb sulfides and sphalerite (ZnS) due to lead activation, and PbSO4 rejected to tailings dams contaminates the surrounding environment with lead. To address these problems, this study investigated the application of ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA) pretreatment extracting PbSO4 to ZnS flotation and the recovery of the extracted Pb2+ as zero-valent Pb by cementation using zero-valent iron (ZVI). The application of EDTA pretreatment could extract ~99.8% of PbSO4, thus depressing ZnS floatability from 82% to 30%. In addition, cementation using ZVI could recover ~99.7% of Pb2+ from the leachate of EDTA pretreatment.