Brian Huser

Dr. Brian Huser

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2016 in Water Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BHBrian Huser
Brian Huser
Sara EgemoseSara Egemose
Sara Egemose
HHHarvey Harper
Harvey Harper
MHMichael Hupfer
Michael Hupfer
HJHenning Jensen
Henning Jensen
MFMartyn Futter
Martyn Futter
114 lakes treated with aluminum (Al) salts to reduce internal phosphorus (P) loading were analyzed to identify factors driving longevity of post-treatment water quality improvements. Lakes varied greatly in morphology, applied Al dose, and other factors that may have affected overall treatment effectiveness. Treatment longevity based on declines in epilimnetic total P (TP) concentration averaged 11 years for all lakes (range of 0-45 years). When longevity estimates were used for lakes with improved conditions through the end of measurements, average longevity increased to 15 years. Significant differences in treatment longevity between deeper, stratified lakes (mean 21 years) and shallow, polymictic lakes (mean 5.7 years) were detected, indicating factors related to lake morphology are important for treatment success. A decision tree developed using a partition model suggested Al dose, Osgood index (OI, a morphological index), and watershed to lake area ratio (related to hydraulic residence time, WA:LA) were the most important variables determining treatment longevity. Multiple linear regression showed that Al dose, WA:LA, and OI explained 47, 32 and 3% respectively of the variation in treatment longevity. Other variables (too data limited to include in the analysis) also appeared to be of importance, including sediment P content to Al dose ratios and the presence of benthic feeding fish in shallow, polymictic lakes.

1 June 2016 in Water Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BHBrian Huser
Brian Huser
MFMartyn Futter
Martyn Futter
JLJeff T. Lee
Jeff T. Lee
MPMike Perniel
Mike Perniel

18 January 2000 in Limnology and Oceanography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EREmil Rydin
Emil Rydin
BHBrian Huser
Brian Huser
EWEugene B. Welch
Eugene B. Welch

31 August 2023 in WIREs Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
OTOlga Tammeorg
Olga Tammeorg
ICIngrid Chorus
Ingrid Chorus
BSBryan Spears
Bryan Spears
PNPeeter Nõges
Peeter Nõges
GNGertrud K. Nürnberg
Gertrud K. Nürnberg
Miquel LurlingMiquel Lurling
Miquel Lurling
Sustainable management of lakes requires us to overcome ecological, economic, and social challenges. These challenges can be addressed by focusing on achieving ecological improvement within a multifaceted, co‐beneficial context. In‐lake restoration measures may promote more rapid ecosystem responses than is feasible with catchment measures alone, even if multiple interventions are needed. In particular, we identify restoration methods that support the overarching societal target of a circular economy through the use of nutrients, sediments, or biomass that are removed from a lake, in agriculture, as food, or for biogas production. In this emerging field of sustainable restoration techniques, we show examples, discuss benefits and pitfalls, and flag areas for further research and development. Each lake should be assessed individually to ensure that restoration approaches will effectively address lake‐specific problems, do not harm the target lake or downstream ecosystems, are cost‐effective, promote delivery of valuable ecosystem services, minimize conflicts in public interests, and eliminate the necessity for repeated interventions. Achieving optimal, sustainable results from lake restoration relies on multidisciplinary research and close interactions between environmental, social, political, and economic sectors.This article is categorized under: Science of Water > Water Quality Water and Life > Stresses and Pressures on Ecosystems Water and Life > Conservation, Management, and Awareness

1 October 2014 in Inland Waters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EMEleanor B. Mackay
Eleanor B. Mackay
SMStephen C. Maberly
Stephen C. Maberly
Gang PanGang Pan
Gang Pan
KRKasper Reitzel
Kasper Reitzel
ABAndy Bruere
Andy Bruere
BSBryan M. Spears
Bryan M. Spears
The use of geoengineering techniques for phosphorus management offers the promise of greater and quicker chemical and ecological recovery. It can be attractive when used with other restoration measures but should not be considered a panacea. The range of materials being proposed for use as well as the in-lake processes targeted for manipulation continues to grow. With increasing political imperatives to meet regulatory goals for water quality, we recommend a coordinated approach to the scientific understanding, costs, and integration of geoengineering with other approaches to lake management.

16 October 2017 in Nature Ecology & Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BSBryan M. Spears
Bryan M. Spears
MFMartyn N. Futter
Martyn N. Futter
Erik JeppesenErik Jeppesen
Erik Jeppesen
BHBrian Huser
Brian Huser
SIStephen Ives
Stephen Ives
STStephen J. Thackeray
Stephen J. Thackeray