Theophilus Acheampong

Dr. Theophilus Acheampong

University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Aberdeen City, UK
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 July 2021 in Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TATheophilus Acheampong
Theophilus Acheampong
EAEli Andreaws Akorsikumah
Eli Andreaws Akorsikumah
JOJohn Osae-Kwapong
John Osae-Kwapong
MKMusah Khalid
Musah Khalid
AAAlfred Appiah
Alfred Appiah
JAJohn Humphrey Amuasi
John Humphrey Amuasi
The impact of COVID-19 vaccination programmes on disease transmission, morbidity and mortality relies heavily on the population’s willingness to accept the vaccine. We explore Ghanaian adult citizens’ vaccine hesitancy attitudes and identify the likelihood of participation or non-participation in the government’s effort to get citizens vaccinated. A fully anonymised cross-sectional online survey of 2345 adult Ghanaians was conducted from 23 to 28 February 2021. Differences in intentions regarding COVID-19 vaccination were explored using Pearson Chi-square tests. Additionally, multinomial logistic regression was used to analyse the factors associated with willingness to receive vaccines. Responses were weighted using the iterative proportional fitting technique to generate a representative sample. About half (51%) of mostly urban adult Ghanaians over 15 years are likely to take the COVID-19 vaccine if made generally available. Almost a fifth (21%) of the respondents were unlikely to take the vaccine, while another 28% were undecided. Additionally, we find differences in vaccine hesitancy among some socio-demographic characteristics such as age, gender, and primary sources of information. Attaining the proverbial 63% to 70% herd immunity threshold in Ghana is only possible if the preventive vaccination programmes are combined with an enhanced and coordinated public education campaign. Such a campaign should focus on promoting the individual and population-level benefits of vaccination and pre-emptive efforts towards addressing misinformation about vaccines.

1 December 2021 in Renewable Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
David AlemzeroDavid Alemzero
David Alemzero
TATheophilus Acheampong
Theophilus Acheampong
SHSun Huaping
Sun Huaping

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SKSeverin Augustin Kabakama
Severin Augustin Kabakama
EKEveline T. Konje
Eveline T. Konje
JDJerome Nyhalah Dinga
Jerome Nyhalah Dinga
CKColman Kishamawe
Colman Kishamawe
IMImran Morhason-Bello
Imran Morhason-Bello
Tafadzwa DzinamariraTafadzwa Dzinamarira
Tafadzwa Dzinamarira
Rates of vaccination against COVID-19 remain lower in sub-Saharan Africa than in other low and middle-income regions. This is, in part, attributed to vaccine hesitancy, mainly due to misinformation about vaccine origin, efficacy and safety. From August to December 2021, we gathered the latest experiences and opinions on four vaccine hesitancy-related areas (policies, perceived risk religious beliefs, and misinformation) from 12 sub-Saharan African researchers, four of whom have published about COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. The authors included two political and business experts, six public health specialists, five epidemiologists, and four biostatisticians from ten sub-Saharan African countries( Cameroon, Ghana, Kenya, Liberia, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zimbabwe). The authors’ overarching opinions were that political influences, religious beliefs and low perceived risk exists in sub-Saharan Africa, and they collectively contribute to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Communication strategies should target populations initially thought by policy makers to be at low risk, use multiple communication avenues and address major concerns in the population.

9 July 2022 in Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PVPrince Asare Vitenu-Sackey
Prince Asare Vitenu-Sackey
TATheophilus Acheampong
Theophilus Acheampong
This study examines the impact of economic policy uncertainty (EPU) and ecological innovation on carbon (CO2) emissions in a panel of 18 developed countries from 2005 to 2018 using second-generation time-series panel data techniques. We use three robust long-run estimators, namely two-stage least squares (2SLS), panel generalised method of moments (GMM) and generalised least squares (GLS), to resolve heterogeneity, endogeneity and simultaneity in the panels. We further performed causality tests to ascertain the direction of causality between the variables. Our estimations suggest three innovative findings. First, economic growth contributes significantly and positively to CO2 emissions; however, this happens at an optimal level of growth after which carbon emission reduces, indicating that our sample exhibits an inverted U-shaped environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) relationship. Second, the impact of EPU on CO2 emissions is diverse: high levels of EPU have a significant influence on CO2 emissions only in high-polluting countries but not in low-polluting ones. Thirdly, research and development (R&D), foreign direct investment (FDI), urbanisation and renewable energy (RE) usage were also found to have varying effects on CO2 emissions. These findings highlight the heterogeneous relationship between carbon emissions and economic indicators even in advanced economies, as the pollution haven hypothesis (PHH) holds true in high-pollution countries while the pollution halo effect holds for low-pollution ones. A key policy implication of this work is that the quest to mitigate emissions should not be a one-size-fits-all approach because not every country’s urbanisation rate, FDI inflows, R&D and renewable energy consumption directly affect CO2 emissions in the face of economic policy uncertainties.

5 June 2024 in Energy Research & Social Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BMBridget Okyerebea Menyeh
Bridget Okyerebea Menyeh
TATheophilus Acheampong
Theophilus Acheampong

1 February 2018 in Energy Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TATheophilus Acheampong
Theophilus Acheampong
RARainer Akumperigya
Rainer Akumperigya