Mohammad Zarei

Dr. Mohammad Zarei

Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 May 2021 in Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ali PormohammadAli Pormohammad
Ali Pormohammad
MZMohammad Zarei
Mohammad Zarei
SGsaied ghorbani
saied ghorbani
Mehdi MohammadiMehdi Mohammadi
Mehdi Mohammadi
MRMohammad Hossein Razizadeh
Mohammad Hossein Razizadeh
Raymond TurnerRaymond Turner
Raymond Turner
The current study systematically reviewed, summarized and meta-analyzed the clinical features of the vaccines in clinical trials to provide a better estimate of their efficacy, side effects and immunogenicity. All relevant publications were systematically searched and collected from major databases up to 12 March 2021. A total of 25 RCTs (123 datasets), 58,889 cases that received the COVID-19 vaccine and 46,638 controls who received placebo were included in the meta-analysis. In total, mRNA-based and adenovirus-vectored COVID-19 vaccines had 94.6% (95% CI 0.936–0.954) and 80.2% (95% CI 0.56–0.93) efficacy in phase II/III RCTs, respectively. Efficacy of the adenovirus-vectored vaccine after the first (97.6%; 95% CI 0.939–0.997) and second (98.2%; 95% CI 0.980–0.984) doses was the highest against receptor-binding domain (RBD) antigen after 3 weeks of injections. The mRNA-based vaccines had the highest level of side effects reported except for diarrhea and arthralgia. Aluminum-adjuvanted vaccines had the lowest systemic and local side effects between vaccines’ adjuvant or without adjuvant, except for injection site redness. The adenovirus-vectored and mRNA-based vaccines for COVID-19 showed the highest efficacy after first and second doses, respectively. The mRNA-based vaccines had higher side effects. Remarkably few experienced extreme adverse effects and all stimulated robust immune responses.

2 January 2021 in Reviews in Medical Virology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MJMaryamsadat Jafari
Maryamsadat Jafari
APAli Pormohammad
Ali Pormohammad
SNSaeideh Aghayari Sheikh Neshin
Saeideh Aghayari Sheikh Neshin
SGsaied ghorbani
saied ghorbani
DBDeepanwita Bose
Deepanwita Bose
MZMohammad Zarei
Mohammad Zarei

9 October 2020 in Reviews in Medical Virology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Ali PormohammadAli Pormohammad
Ali Pormohammad
SGsaied ghorbani
saied ghorbani
AKAlireza Khatami
Alireza Khatami
MRMohammad Hossein Razizadeh
Mohammad Hossein Razizadeh
EAEhsan Alborzi
Ehsan Alborzi
Raymond TurnerRaymond Turner
Raymond Turner

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XPXavier Palomer
Xavier Palomer
Emma BarrosoEmma Barroso
Emma Barroso
JPJavier Pizarro-Delgado
Javier Pizarro-Delgado
LPLucía Peña
Lucía Peña
GBGaia Botteri
Gaia Botteri
Manuel Vazquez-CarreraManuel Vazquez-Carrera
Manuel Vazquez-Carrera
Research in recent years on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)β/δ indicates that it plays a key role in the maintenance of energy homeostasis, both at the cellular level and within the organism as a whole. PPARβ/δ activation might help prevent the development of metabolic disorders, including obesity, dyslipidaemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. This review highlights research findings on the PPARβ/δ regulation of energy metabolism and the development of diseases related to altered cellular and body metabolism. It also describes the potential of the pharmacological activation of PPARβ/δ as a treatment for human metabolic disorders.

9 September 2021 in Reviews in Medical Virology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MZMohammad Zarei
Mohammad Zarei
DBDeepanwita Bose
Deepanwita Bose
MNMasoud Nouri‐Vaskeh
Masoud Nouri‐Vaskeh
VTVida Tajiknia
Vida Tajiknia
RZRamin Zand
Ramin Zand
Mehdi GhasemiMehdi Ghasemi
Mehdi Ghasemi
Summary: Since the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), our understanding regarding the pathophysiology and clinical manifestations of this disease have been improving. However, we still have limited data on long‐term effects and lingering symptoms of post COVID‐19 recovery. Despite predilection of COVID‐19 for lungs, multiple extra‐pulmonary manifestations appear in multiple organs and biological systems and with continued infection and recovery worldwide. It is necessary that clinicians provide patients with previous SARS‐CoV‐2 infection with expectations of long‐term effects during or after recovery from COVID‐19. Herein, we review the long‐term impact of COVID‐19 on different organ systems reported from different clinical studies. Understanding risk factors and signs and symptoms of long‐term consequences after recovery from COVID‐19 will allow for proper follow‐up and management of the disease post recovery.

25 December 2021 in Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ali PormohammadAli Pormohammad
Ali Pormohammad
MZMohammad Zarei
Mohammad Zarei
SGsaied ghorbani
saied ghorbani
Mehdi MohammadiMehdi Mohammadi
Mehdi Mohammadi
SNSaeideh Aghayari Sheikh Neshin
Saeideh Aghayari Sheikh Neshin
Raymond TurnerRaymond Turner
Raymond Turner
The high transmissibility, mortality, and morbidity rate of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta (B.1.617.2) variant have raised concerns regarding vaccine effectiveness (VE). To address this issue, all publications relevant to the effectiveness of vaccines against the Delta variant were searched in the Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, and Medline (via PubMed) databases up to 15 October 2021. A total of 15 studies (36 datasets) were included in the meta-analysis. After the first dose, the VE against the Delta variant for each vaccine was 0.567 (95% CI 0.520–0.613) for Pfizer-BioNTech, 0.72 (95% CI 0.589–0.822) for Moderna, 0.44 (95% CI 0.301–0.588) for AstraZeneca, and 0.138 (95% CI 0.076–0.237) for CoronaVac. Meta-analysis of 2,375,957 vaccinated cases showed that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine had the highest VE against the infection after the second dose, at 0.837 (95% CI 0.672–0.928), and third dose, at 0.972 (95% CI 0.96–0.978), as well as the highest VE for the prevention of severe infection or death, at 0.985 (95% CI 0.95–0.99), amongst all COVID-19 vaccines. The short-term effectiveness of vaccines, especially mRNA-based vaccines, for the prevention of the Delta variant infection, hospitalization, severe infection, and death is supported by this study. Limitations include a lack of long-term efficacy data, and under-reporting of COVID-19 infection cases in observational studies, which has the potential to falsely skew VE rates. Overall, this study supports the decisions by public health decision makers to promote the population vaccination rate to control the Delta variant infection and the emergence of further variants.