Orlando Ramirez-Garzon

Dr. Orlando Ramirez-Garzon

Research Officer, University of Queensland
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 April 2024 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OROrlando Ramirez-Garzon
Orlando Ramirez-Garzon
JAJohn Alawneh
John Alawneh
DBDavid Barber
David Barber
HLHuanle Liu
Huanle Liu
MSMartin Soust
Martin Soust
This longitudinal study aimed to quantify the effects of dietary supplementation of a direct-fed microbial (DFM) consisting of three lactobacilli isolates on milk yield, milk fat and protein yields, somatic cell count (SCC), and liveweight in a single dairy herd in Australia. A total of 150 dairy cows were randomly selected based on parity and days in milk and divided into two groups: control (n = 75) and DFM treatment (n = 75). Throughout the study, the two groups of cows were housed separately in a dry lot yard, and each group had their own feeding area. For the DFM treatment group, selected cows in mid-lactation were supplemented with 10 mL/cow/day of the DFM via top dressing of the feed for the remainder of the lactation and through the dry period, extending into subsequent lactation. The control group had no supplementation. The milk yield and liveweight were recorded daily. Milk samples were collected every two months for milk component analysis (fat, protein, and somatic cell count [SCC]). The DFM-treated cows gained more liveweight across the study (19.40 kg, 95% CI 0.44 kg; 38.30 kg, p = 0.05) compared to the control cows. In the second production year, the DFM-treated cows mobilized more liveweight (−6.06 kg, 95% CI −10.49 kg; −1.61 kg, p = 0.01) and produced more milk (0.39 L/d 95% CI 0.10; 0.89, p = 0.05). Over a full lactation, DFM cows yielded at least 258 L (95% CI 252 L; 265 L) more milk than controls. No significant differences were found in fat and protein yield or SCC. This study suggests that consistent and ongoing supplementation with a Lacticaseibacillus- and Lentilactobacillus-based DFM could have a positive effect on milk production, but further research is needed to understand the underlying mechanism.

5 June 2021 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OROrlando Ramirez-Garzon
Orlando Ramirez-Garzon
Ricardo Jorge Soares MagalhaesRicardo Jorge Soares Magalhaes
Ricardo Jorge Soares Magalhaes
NSNana Satake
Nana Satake
JHJonathan Hill
Jonathan Hill
CJClaudia Jimenez
Claudia Jimenez
MMMichael McGowan
Michael McGowan
Endometrial infections are a common cause of reproductive loss in cattle. Accurate diagnosis is important to reduce the economic losses caused by endometritis. A range of sampling procedures have been developed which enable collection of endometrial tissue or luminal cells or uterine fluid. However, as these are all invasive procedures, there is a risk that sampling around the time of breeding may adversely affect subsequent pregnancy rate. This systematic review compared the pregnancy rates (PR) of cattle which underwent uterine lavage (UL), cotton swab (CS), cytobrush (CB), cytotape (CT), or endometrial biopsy (EB) sampling procedures with those that were not sampled. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) protocol, relevant databases, including Pubmed, Web of Science, CAB Abstracts, VetMed Resource–Ruminants, and Scopus, were searched. The outcome measured was the pregnancy rate after the collection of endometrial sample(s). Seven studies, involving a total of 3693 cows, fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the systematic review and allowed the comparison of PR between sampled (n = 1254) and non-sampled cows (n = 2409). The results of the systematic review showed that endometrial sampling procedures can be performed before breeding or shortly after insemination without adversely affecting pregnancy rates in cattle. However, further studies are needed to validate this information.

27 November 2024 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BCBronwyn E Campbell
Bronwyn E Campbell
Mohammad Mahmudul HassanMohammad Mahmudul Hassan
Mohammad Mahmudul Hassan
RMRobert Moore
Robert Moore
TOTimothy Olchowy
Timothy Olchowy
SRShahab Ranjbar
Shahab Ranjbar
JAJohn Alawneh
John Alawneh
The rumen microbiota of dairy cows plays a crucial role in fermenting fibrous material, essential for nutrient extraction and overall productivity, detoxification of anti-nutritional toxic compounds, synthesis of vital nutrients, and is essential for optimal animal health. This study investigated the impact of Lentilactobacillus-, Lactocaseibacillus-, and Lacticaseibacillus-based direct-fed microbial (DFM) supplementation on dairy cows’ faecal microbial composition and diversity. The study was carried out on a commercial dairy farm using 50 Holstein-Friesian cows randomly assigned into control (CON) and treatment (TRT) groups. Faecal samples were collected directly from the rectum every two months from September 2021 to January 2023. The bacterial 16S rRNA gene and fungal ITS-1 regions were amplified, sequenced, and analysed. Microbial diversity was assessed through alpha- and beta-diversity metrics. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) was performed to identify which taxa were driving the changes seen in the microbiota over time and treatment. Bacteroidaceae were the most prevalent bacterial family, followed by Lachnospiraceae and Muribaculaceae in both CON and TRT cows. Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, and Mucoromycota were the dominant three fungal phyla in the faeces of both CON and TRT cows. Bacterial genera Fructilactobacillus was abundant in the CON and Absicoccus in the TRT groups. Fungal taxa Chaetothryriales_incertae_sedis and Pseudomentella were absent in the faeces of TRT cows. Significant temporal and specific taxonomic differences were observed between the CON and TRT groups. The study’s findings underscore the dynamic nature of microbial communities and the importance of targeted dietary interventions. Further research is necessary to elucidate these microbial shifts, long-term impacts, and functional implications, aiming to optimise ruminant nutrition and enhance dairy cow performance.

11 October 2024 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OROrlando Ramirez-Garzon
Orlando Ramirez-Garzon
DBDavid Barber
David Barber
LMLoreto Meneses
Loreto Meneses
MSMartin Soust
Martin Soust
This study was conducted at a commercial dairy farm in Queensland, Australia to evaluate the effects of feeding a lactic acid bacteria-based direct-fed microbial (DFM) during gestation on the metabolic profile of periparturient dairy cows and its effects on milk production and body weight. A total of 150 multiparous Holstein cows were randomly selected based on parity (2.3) and days in milk (130 DIM) and divided into two groups of 75 cows each (control and DFM). The control cows were assigned to a basal diet consisting of a silage-based partial mixed ration (PMR), concentrate fed in the dairy twice a day, and ad libitum pasture. The DFM group received the same basal diet supplemented with three strains of Lactobacillus top-dressed in the feed. The DFM supplementation continued during both the dry period and the subsequent lactation. A subset of 82 cows (40 control and 42 DFM) were monitored during the calving season (March to July 2022) to assess the metabolic profile and postpartum performance. Blood samples were collected during the periparturient period (−4 to −2 w prepartum, around calving, and at weeks 1, 3, and 6 postpartum) to measure the levels of metabolites, enzymes, and minerals. Overall, the serum glucose, NEFA, and chloride levels were higher, while protein and urea were lower in cows supplemented with the DFM (p < 0.005). The pre-calving levels of glucose were higher and the total bilirubin, urea, and BHB were lower in cows supplemented with DFM than in the control (p < 0.05). The post-calving levels of glucose and Mg were also higher in the DFM cows than in the control cows (p < 0.05). Average milk production at 110 DIM was significantly higher in the DFM cows compared to control cows (p = 0.03). Although the total milk production over 305 days was numerically greater in the DFM cows, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.3), whereas the milk protein percentage was higher in the control cows (p = 0.03). The body weight of the DFM cows was greater during the periparturient period (p = 0.001) than that of the control cows. In the DFM cows, glucose levels had a positive correlation (r = 0.16) with milk yield, at 110 DIM, while serum total protein had a positive correlation with body weight (r = 0.32) (p < 0.05). In conclusion, feeding Lactobacillus-based DFM during gestation can positively influence the metabolic profile of periparturient cows, which, in turn, may affect the milk production and body weight of postpartum dairy cows.

11 March 2017 in Reproduction in Domestic Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
OROrlando Ramirez-Garzon
Orlando Ramirez-Garzon
NSN Satake
N Satake
RLRe Lyons
Re Lyons
JHJ Hill
J Hill
MHMk Holland
Mk Holland
MMM McGowan
M McGowan

18 July 2025 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BCBronwyn E Campbell
Bronwyn E Campbell
Mohammad Mahmudul HassanMohammad Mahmudul Hassan
Mohammad Mahmudul Hassan
TOTimothy Olchowy
Timothy Olchowy
SRShahab Ranjbar
Shahab Ranjbar
MSMartin Soust
Martin Soust
JAJohn I. Al-Alawneh
John I. Al-Alawneh
Previous studies of direct-fed microbial (DFM) supplements showed variable effects on the microbiota and physiology of dairy cows. The main aims of this study were to investigate the milk microbiota of cows supplemented with a lactobacilli-based DFM compared to untreated cows; describe the changes; and quantify the association between the taxa and cow productivity. The study followed seventy-five Holstein–Friesian dairy cows supplemented with a DFM over 16 months compared to seventy-five non-supplemented cows. Twenty-five cows from each group were sampled for microbiota analysis. The top taxa significantly associated with the variables were as follows: Age (Mammaliicoccus_319276, Turicibacter), milk production (Turicibacter, Bifidobacterium_388775), DIM (Stenotrophomonas_A_615274, Pedobacter_887417), milk fat percentage (Pseudomonas_E_647464, Lactobacillus), calendar month (Jeotgalicoccus_A_310962, Planococcus), milk protein percentage (Tistrella, Pseudomonas_E_650325), experimental group (Enterococcus_B, Aeromonas), SCC (Paenochrobactrum, Pseudochrobactrum), and trimester of pregnancy (Dyadobacter_906144, VFJN01 (Acidimicrobiales)). These were identified using multivariable analysis. Twenty-six genera were associated with the differences between experimental groups, including Pseudomonas, Lactococcus and Staphylococcus. Microbial taxa that changed in relative abundance over time included Atopostipes, Brevibacterium and Succinivibrio. Many of these genera were also part of the core microbiota. Supplementation with the DFM significantly altered the milk microbiota composition in the dairy cows, highlighting the impact of long-term DFM supplementation on microbial communities.