Xin Gu

Dr. Xin Gu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2023 in Accident Analysis & Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YZYunchao Zhang
Yunchao Zhang
YCYanyan Chen
Yanyan Chen
XGXin Gu
Xin Gu
Nang Ngai SzeNang Ngai Sze
Nang Ngai Sze
HJHUANG jianling
HUANG jianling

7 August 2023 in Accident Analysis & Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZSZhiyuan Sun
Zhiyuan Sun
DWDuo Wang
Duo Wang
XGXin Gu
Xin Gu
MAMohamed Abdel-Aty
Mohamed Abdel-Aty
YXYuxuan Xing
Yuxuan Xing
YCYanyan Chen
Yanyan Chen

28 November 2023 in IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RYRenteng Yuan
Renteng Yuan
AMAbdel-Baset Mohamed
Abdel-Baset Mohamed
QXQiaojun Xiang
Qiaojun Xiang
ZWZijin Wang
Zijin Wang
XGXin Gu
Xin Gu
Accurate vehicle trajectory prediction is critical for autonomous vehicles and advanced driver assistance systems to make driving decisions and improve traffic safety. This paper proposes a novel Temporal Multi-task Mixture Of Experts (TMMOE) model for simultaneously predicting the vehicle trajectory and driving intention, considering interconnections among tasks. As for the methodology, the proposed model consists of three layers: a shared layer, an expert layer, and a fully connected layer. In more detail, the first layer utilizes Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN) to extract temporal features whereas the expert layer incorporates the gating mechanism to memorize and filter the temporal dependence of sequences and, finally, the fully connected layer is applied to integrate and export prediction results. Furthermore, the homoscedastic uncertainty algorithm is used to construct the multi-task loss function. The open data source CitySim dataset is chosen to validate the performance of the proposed TMMOE model; moreover, a novel lane line reconstruction method is introduced to mitigate measurement errors of the dataset. Two-part information, including the history of the vehicle's trajectory and the interaction indicators, are employed as the input variables. The result indicates that the TMMOE algorithm exhibits superior performance when compared to the other five models, including Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Network, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), CNN-LSTM, TCN, and Gate Recurrent Unit (GRU), while considering varying input sequence lengths are 3 s, 6 s, and 9 s respectively. Finally, the sensitivity analysis demonstrates that considering driving intentions in vehicle trajectory prediction can significantly enhance the prediction accuracy of vehicle trajectories.

31 January 2022 in Traffic Injury Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZSZhiyuan Sun
Zhiyuan Sun
YXYuxuan Xing
Yuxuan Xing
XGXin Gu
Xin Gu
YCYanyan Chen
Yanyan Chen
More attention should be given to bicycle-motor vehicle (BMV) crashes, as cyclists are at a higher risk of suffering injuries than motor vehicle users in a crash. This study aims to explore the fac...

3 May 2024 in Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YGYinjia Guo
Yinjia Guo
YCYanyan Chen
Yanyan Chen
XGXin Gu
Xin Gu
JGJifu Guo
Jifu Guo
SZShuyan Zheng
Shuyan Zheng
YZYuntong Zhou
Yuntong Zhou

14 January 2021 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YMYongfeng Ma
Yongfeng Ma
XGXin Gu
Xin Gu
YYYa’nan Yu
Ya’nan Yu
AKAemal J. Khattak
Aemal J. Khattak
SCShuyan Chen
Shuyan Chen
TKTang Kun
Tang Kun
Aggressive driving is common across the world. While most aggressive driving is conscious, some aggressive driving behavior may be unconscious on part of motor vehicle drivers. Perceptual bias of aggressive driving behavior is one of the main causes of traffic accidents. This paper focuses on identifying impact factors related to aggressive driving perceptual bias. Questionnaire data from 690 drivers, collected from a drivers’ retraining course administered by the Traffic Management Bureau in Nanjing, China, were used to collect drivers’ socioeconomic characteristics, personality traits, and external environment data. Actual penalty points were considered as an objective indicator and Gaussian mixture model (GMM) was used to cluster an objective indicator into different levels. The driving anger expression (DAX) was used to measure drivers’ self-assessment of aggressive driving behavior and then to identify perceptual biases. Then a binary logistic model was estimated to explore the influence of different factors on drivers’ perceptual bias of aggressive driving behavior. Results showed that bus drivers were less likely to have perceptual bias of aggressive driving behavior. Truck drivers, drivers with an extraversion characteristic, and drivers who have dissatisfaction with road infrastructure and actual work were likely to have a perceptual bias. The findings are potentially beneficial for proposing targeted countermeasures to identify dangerous drivers and improve drivers’ safety awareness.