Maha Badawi

Dr. Maha Badawi

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 March 2010 in Advances in Hematology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMaha Badawi
Maha Badawi
LVLinda M. Vickars
Linda M. Vickars
JCJocelyn M. Chase
Jocelyn M. Chase
HLHEATHER LEITCH
HEATHER LEITCH
Iron chelation therapy is often used to treat iron overload in patients requiring transfusion of red blood cells (RBC). A 76-year-old man with MDS type refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia, intermediate-1 IPSS risk, was referred when he became transfusion dependent. He declined infusional chelation but subsequently accepted oral therapy. Following the initiation of chelation, RBC transfusion requirement ceased and he remained transfusion independent over 40 months later. Over the same time course, ferritin levels decreased but did not normalize. There have been eighteen other MDS patients reported showing improvement in hemoglobin level with iron chelation; nine became transfusion independent, nine had decreased transfusion requirements, and some showed improved trilineage myelopoiesis. The clinical features of these patients are summarized and possible mechanisms for such an effect of iron chelation on cytopenias are discussed.

25 June 2009 in Hematological Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HLHEATHER LEITCH
HEATHER LEITCH
JCJocelyn M. Chase
Jocelyn M. Chase
TGTrisha A. Goodman
Trisha A. Goodman
HEHatoon Ezzat
Hatoon Ezzat
MRMeaghan D. Rollins
Meaghan D. Rollins
LVLinda M. Vickars
Linda M. Vickars

1 February 2020 in Transfusion
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SHSalwa Hindawi
Salwa Hindawi
MBMaha Badawi
Maha Badawi
RERefaat Elfayoumi
Refaat Elfayoumi
TETarek Elgemmezi
Tarek Elgemmezi
AHAbrar Al Hassani
Abrar Al Hassani
KGKholoud Gholam
Kholoud Gholam

5 January 2021 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Thamir AlandijanyThamir Alandijany
Thamir Alandijany
SESherif El-Kafrawy
Sherif El-Kafrawy
AGAbrar AL Ghamdi
Abrar AL Ghamdi
FQFadi Qashqari
Fadi Qashqari
AFArwa Ali Faizo
Arwa Ali Faizo
Esam AzharEsam Azhar
Esam Azhar
In response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), Saudi Arabia have imposed timely restrictions to minimize the infection spread, lower the risk for vulnerable groups, and reduce the pressure on healthcare services. The effectiveness of these measures has not been assessed comprehensively and, thereby, remains uncertain. Besides monitoring the number of COVID-19 cases diagnosed by molecular assays, the seroprevalence can serve as an indicator for the incidence rate among the general population. This study aimed to evaluate seroprevalence status of all healthy blood donors who attended one of the main largest hospital located in the western region of Saudi Arabia from 1 January to 31 May 2020. The study period covered two months prior to reporting the first COVID-19 case in the country on 2 March 2020. Importantly, it covered the period when “lock-down type” measures have been enforced. Samples were subjected to in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA), and microneutralization (MN). The sero statuses of all samples were confirmed negative, demonstrating the lack of antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) among blood donors during COVID-19 lockdown period. This study supports the hypothesis that COVID-19 restrictions have potential for limiting the extent of the infection.

1 June 2021 in Journal of Infection and Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FKFatemah O. Kamel
Fatemah O. Kamel
RMRania M Magadmi
Rania M Magadmi
SAsulafa Alqutub
sulafa Alqutub
MBMaha Badawi
Maha Badawi
FAFatin Al-Sayes
Fatin Al-Sayes
SASoheir Adam
Soheir Adam
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The clinical features of COVID-19 were mentioned in previous studies. However, risk factors for COVID-19 are not fully recognized. The aim of this study is to characterize risk factors and clinical features of COVID-19 disease in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. A retrospective, chart-review, case-control study was conducted at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Demographic, clinical, radiological, and laboratory data on patients diagnosed between March 18 and May 18, 2020 were collected and analyzed. We reviewed medical records on 297 suspected cases of COVID-19. Of these, 175 (59%) tested positive for COVID-19 by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and considered as cases, while 122 (41%) tested negative and considered as control. COVID-19 positive cases were more likely to be males, and non-health care providers. Hypertension (15%), diabetes (10%) and two or more concurrent comorbidities (54.4%) were more prevalent among COVID-19 patients. Patients presented with fever, cough, and loss of taste/smell were more likely to test positive for COVID-19 (P = 0.001, 0.008, 0.008; respectively). Radiological evidence of pneumonia was associated with confirmed COVID-19 disease (P = 0.001). Shortness of breath and gastrointestinal symptoms were not associated with the risk of COVID-19 at presentation. On admission, white blood cells, neutrophils, lymphocytes, eosinophils, basophils, and platelets were significantly lower among COVID-19 patients compared with controls. Surprisingly, D-Dimer levels were lower among COVID-19 positive patients when compared with controls. Male gender, hypertension, and diabetes are the most commonly observed risk factors associated with COVID-19 disease in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. COVID-19 patient had significantly lower lymphocyte and neutrophil counts.

12 January 2022 in BioMed Research International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NHNora Hakami
Nora Hakami
AAAfnan J. Al-Sulami
Afnan J. Al-Sulami
WAWafaa Ahmed Alhazmi
Wafaa Ahmed Alhazmi
TQTalal Qadah
Talal Qadah
WBWaleed M. Bawazir
Waleed M. Bawazir
SHSalwa Hindawi
Salwa Hindawi
Background. The coronavirus disease‐19 (COVID‐19) pandemic caused a major impact on blood donation process and supply globally. A lockdown management procedure was launched nationally in Saudi Arabia to manage this global health crisis. The main aim of this study was to determine the effect of COVID‐19 lockdown on blood donation services and supply in different regions of Saudi Arabia. Study Design and Methods. A retrospective cross‐sectional study was conducted in the blood bank centers of 5 major cities including Riyadh, Jeddah, Dammam, Hail, and Jizan in Saudi Arabia. Demographic and blood characteristics were retrieved from the first 6 months of 2019 (January–June) and compared to the same period of 2020. Results. Our findings showed variation in the characteristics of blood donation and supply among the centers surveyed, as some of these centers were adversely affected, while others showed an increase in the availability of blood products during the pandemic. For example, Jeddah’s center was significantly affected by COVID‐19 lockdown whereas Hail’s center showed a significant increase in the analyzed characteristics of blood donation services in 2020 compared to 2019. Overall, there was no major difference among the surveyed centers between 2020 and 2019, and this might be due to the effective management of blood supply and transfusion. Discussion. Although blood supply and transfusion practice was slightly affected at various degree among the surveyed centers, the whole process did not show a significant effect on the overall outcome. This is in fact due to the proper preparedness, management of blood requirements and supplies, and efficient response of the surveyed centers in Saudi Arabia.