Camila Delpivo

Dr. Camila Delpivo

LEITAT Technological Center
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2013 in Dyes and Pigments
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Carla BogaCarla Boga
Carla Boga
CDCamila Delpivo
Camila Delpivo
BBBarbara Ballarin
Barbara Ballarin
MMMarco Morigi
Marco Morigi
SGSamanda Galli
Samanda Galli
STSilvia Tozzi
Silvia Tozzi

24 January 2023 in Nanomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NRNienke Ruijter
Nienke Ruijter
LSLya G. Soeteman-Hernández
Lya G. Soeteman-Hernández
Marie CarriereMarie Carriere
Marie Carriere
MBMatthew Boyles
Matthew Boyles
PMPolly McLean
Polly McLean
HBHedwig Braakhuis
Hedwig Braakhuis
The Safe-by-Design (SbD) concept aims to facilitate the development of safer materials/products, safer production, and safer use and end-of-life by performing timely SbD interventions to reduce hazard, exposure, or both. Early hazard screening is a crucial first step in this process. In this review, for the first time, commonly used in vitro assays are evaluated for their suitability for SbD hazard testing of nanomaterials (NMs). The goal of SbD hazard testing is identifying hazard warnings in the early stages of innovation. For this purpose, assays should be simple, cost-effective, predictive, robust, and compatible. For several toxicological endpoints, there are indications that commonly used in vitro assays are able to predict hazard warnings. In addition to the evaluation of assays, this review provides insights into the effects of the choice of cell type, exposure and dispersion protocol, and the (in)accurate determination of dose delivered to cells on predictivity. Furthermore, compatibility of assays with challenging advanced materials and NMs released from nano-enabled products (NEPs) during the lifecycle is assessed, as these aspects are crucial for SbD hazard testing. To conclude, hazard screening of NMs is complex and joint efforts between innovators, scientists, and regulators are needed to further improve SbD hazard testing.

1 March 2015 in Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VMValentina Marassi
Valentina Marassi
SCSonia Casolari
Sonia Casolari
Barbara RodaBarbara Roda
Barbara Roda
AZAndrea Zattoni
Andrea Zattoni
PRPierluigi Reschiglian
Pierluigi Reschiglian
Anna CostaAnna Costa
Anna Costa

1 July 2017 in Toxicology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAndrea Stoccoro
Andrea Stoccoro
SBSebastiano Di Bucchianico
Sebastiano Di Bucchianico
Fabio CoppedèFabio Coppedè
Fabio Coppedè
JPJessica Ponti
Jessica Ponti
CUChiara Uboldi
Chiara Uboldi
LMLucia Migliore
Lucia Migliore

1 April 2011 in Tetrahedron Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GBGraziano Baccolini
Graziano Baccolini
Carla BogaCarla Boga
Carla Boga
CDCamila Delpivo
Camila Delpivo
GMGabriele Micheletti
Gabriele Micheletti