Sören Möller

Dr. Sören Möller

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 August 2017 in Nuclear Fusion
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBSebastijan Brezinsek
Sebastijan Brezinsek
Jan CoenenJan Coenen
Jan Coenen
TST. Schwarz-Selinger
T. Schwarz-Selinger
KSK. Schmid
K. Schmid
AKA. Kirschner
A. Kirschner
WCWp Pfc Contributors
Wp Pfc Contributors

1 December 2014 in Journal of Nuclear Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LBLuxherta Buzi
Luxherta Buzi
GTGreg De Temmerman
Greg De Temmerman
BUBernhard Unterberg
Bernhard Unterberg
MRMichael Reinhart
Michael Reinhart
Andrey M. LitnovskyAndrey M. Litnovsky
Andrey M. Litnovsky
SMSören Möller
Sören Möller

28 June 2019 in Nuclear Fusion
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AKArkadi Kreter
Arkadi Kreter
DNDaisuke Nishijima
Daisuke Nishijima
RDRussell P Doerner
Russell P Doerner
MFMichaele Freisinger
Michaele Freisinger
Christian LinsmeierChristian Linsmeier
Christian Linsmeier
BUB. Unterberg
B. Unterberg

1 April 2020 in Journal of Nuclear Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RSR. Stadlmayr
R. Stadlmayr
PSP.S. Szabo
P.S. Szabo
DMD. Mayer
D. Mayer
CCC. Cupak
C. Cupak
TDT. Dittmar
T. Dittmar
FAFriedrich Aumayr
Friedrich Aumayr

18 June 2013 in Nuclear Fusion
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Andrey M. LitnovskyAndrey M. Litnovsky
Andrey M. Litnovsky
MMM. Matveeva
M. Matveeva
AHA. Herrmann
A. Herrmann
VRV. Rohde
V. Rohde
MMMatej Mayer
Matej Mayer
TTthe ASDEX Upgrade Team
the ASDEX Upgrade Team

1 December 2016 in Nuclear Materials and Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RRR. Rayaprolu
R. Rayaprolu
SMSören Möller
Sören Möller
Christian LinsmeierChristian Linsmeier
Christian Linsmeier
SSS. Spellerberg
S. Spellerberg
This study combines both transmutational changes and accelerated damage by simulation of irradiating tungsten with 16, 30 and 45 MeV protons. Comparative results indicate 30 MeV to be most optimal amongst the three, for uniformity of combined damage. Finally, the results were compared against fission reactor calculations and DEMO relevant compositional changes. Using 30 MeV protons, for damages of 1 dpa equivalent, the rhenium content is calculated as 401 appm. This compares well against appm induced within a DEMO reactor and is better than estimated 50,000 appm for a fission reactor. Using higher energy protons, the recoils are expected to behave similar to neutron displacement damage creation. Additionally, the study suggests near constant and comparable damage for sample thickness’s upto 500 µm