Daniel Molzahn

Dr. Daniel Molzahn

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 July 2017 in IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DMDaniel Molzahn
Daniel Molzahn
FDFlorian Dorfler
Florian Dorfler
HSHenrik Sandberg
Henrik Sandberg
SLSteven H. Low
Steven H. Low
SCSambuddha Chakrabarti
Sambuddha Chakrabarti
JLJavad Lavaei
Javad Lavaei
Historically, centrally computed algorithms have been the primary means of power system optimization and control. With increasing penetrations of distributed energy resources requiring optimization and control of power systems with many controllable devices, distributed algorithms have been the subject of significant research interest. This paper surveys the literature of distributed algorithms with applications to optimization and control of power systems. In particular, this paper reviews distributed algorithms for offline solution of optimal power flow (OPF) problems as well as online algorithms for real-time solution of OPF, optimal frequency control, optimal voltage control, and optimal wide-area control problems.

3 December 2021 in IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NPNiloy Patari
Niloy Patari
VVVenkatesh Venkataramanan
Venkatesh Venkataramanan
ASAnurag Srivastava
Anurag Srivastava
DMDaniel Molzahn
Daniel Molzahn
NLNa Li
Na Li
AAAnuradha Annaswamy
Anuradha Annaswamy
Electric distribution grid operations typically rely on both centralized optimization and local non-optimal control techniques. As an alternative, distribution system operational practices can consider distributed optimization techniques that leverage communications among various neighboring agents to achieve optimal operation. With the rapidly increasing integration of distributed energy resources (DERs), distributed optimization algorithms are growing in importance due to their potential advantages in scalability, flexibility, privacy, and robustness relative to centralized optimization. Implementation of distributed optimization offers multiple challenges and also opportunities. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the recent advancements in distributed optimization for electric distribution systems and classifications using key attributes. Problem formulations and distributed optimization algorithms are provided for example use cases, including volt/var control, market clearing process, loss minimization, and conservation voltage reduction. Finally, this paper also presents future research needs for the applicability of distributed optimization algorithms in the distribution system.

15 March 2017 in IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DMDaniel Molzahn
Daniel Molzahn
The solution to an optimal power flow (OPF) problem provides a minimum cost operating point for an electric power system. The performance of OPF solution techniques strongly depends on the problem's feasible space. This paper presents an algorithm that is guaranteed to compute the entire feasible spaces of small OPF problems to within a specified discretization tolerance. Specifically, the feasible space is computed by discretizing certain of the OPF problem's inequality constraints to obtain a set of power flow equations. All solutions to the power flow equations at each discretization point are obtained using the Numerical Polynomial Homotopy Continuation algorithm. To improve computational tractability, “bound tightening” and “grid pruning” algorithms use convex relaxations to preclude consideration of many discretization points that are infeasible for the OPF problem. The proposed algorithm is used to generate the feasible spaces of two small test cases.

22 June 2020 in IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
APAlejandra Pena-Ordieres
Alejandra Pena-Ordieres
DMDaniel Molzahn
Daniel Molzahn
LRLine Roald
Line Roald
AWAndreas Waechter
Andreas Waechter
Managing uncertainty and variability in power injections has become a major concern for power system operators due to the increasing levels of fluctuating renewable energy connected to the grid. This work addresses this uncertainty via a joint chance-constrained formulation of the DC optimal power flow (OPF) problem, which satisfies all the constraints jointly with a pre-determined probability. The few existing approaches for solving joint chance-constrained OPF problems are typically either computationally intractable for large-scale problems or give overly conservative solutions that satisfy the constraints far more often than required, resulting in excessively costly operation. This paper proposes an algorithm for solving joint chance-constrained DC OPF problems by adopting an Sl1QP-type trust-region algorithm. This algorithm uses a sample-based approach that avoids making strong assumptions on the distribution of the uncertainties, scales favorably to large problems, and can be tuned to obtain less conservative results. We illustrate the performance of our method using several IEEE test cases. The results demonstrate the proposed algorithm's advantages in computational times and limited conservativeness of the solutions relative to other joint chance-constrained DC OPF algorithms.

27 April 2021 in IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DLDongchan Lee
Dongchan Lee
KTKonstantin Turitsyn
Konstantin Turitsyn
DMDaniel Molzahn
Daniel Molzahn
LRLine Roald
Line Roald
Electric power grids regularly experience uncertain fluctuations from load demands and renewables, which poses a risk of violating operational limits designed to safeguard the system. In this paper, we consider the robust AC OPF problem that minimizes the generation cost while requiring a certain level of system security in the presence of uncertainty. The robust AC OPF problem requires that the system satisfy operational limits for all uncertainty realizations within a specified uncertainty set. Guaranteeing robustness is particularly challenging due to the non-convex, nonlinear AC power flow equations, which may not always have a solution. In this work, we extend a previously developed convex restriction to a robust convex restriction , which is a convex inner approximation of the non-convex feasible region of the AC OPF problem that accounts for uncertainty in the power injections. We then use the robust convex restriction in an algorithm that obtains robust solutions to AC OPF problems by solving a sequence of convex optimization problems. We demonstrate our algorithm and its ability to control robustness versus operating cost trade-offs using PGLib test cases.

11 April 2019 in IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MYMengqi Yao
Mengqi Yao
DMDaniel Molzahn
Daniel Molzahn
JMJohanna L. Mathieu
Johanna L. Mathieu
The increasing penetration of renewables has driven power systems to operate closer to their stability boundaries, increasing the risk of instability. We propose a multiperiod optimal power-flow approach that uses demand responsive loads to improve the steady-state voltage stability, which is measured by the smallest singular value (SSV) of the power-flow Jacobian matrix. In contrast to past work that employs load shedding to improve the stability, our approach improves the SSV by decreasing and increasing individual loads while keeping the total loading constant to avoid the fluctuation of the system frequency. Additionally, an energy payback period maintains the total energy consumption of each load at its nominal value. The objective function balances SSV improvements against generation costs in the energy payback period. We develop an iterative linear programming algorithm using singular value sensitivities to obtain an ac-feasible solution. We demonstrate its performance on two IEEE test systems. The results show that demand response actions can improve the static voltage stability, in some cases, more cost effectively than generation actions. We also compare our algorithm's performance to that of an iterative nonlinear programming algorithm from the literature. We find that our approach is approximately six times faster when applied to the IEEE 9-bus system, allowing us to demonstrate its performance on the IEEE 118-bus system.