Pushparaj Karthika

Dr. Pushparaj Karthika

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2022 in Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PKPushparaj Karthika
Pushparaj Karthika
WLWen-Chao Liu
Wen-Chao Liu
AMArun Meyyazhagan
Arun Meyyazhagan
AOAntonio Orlacchio
Antonio Orlacchio
MPManikantan Pappusamy
Manikantan Pappusamy
BBBalamuralikrishnan Balasubramanian
Balamuralikrishnan Balasubramanian

16 June 2021 in Foods
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Balamuralikrishnan BalasubramanianBalamuralikrishnan Balasubramanian
Balamuralikrishnan Balasubramanian
Wen-Chao LiuWen-Chao Liu
Wen-Chao Liu
PKPushparaj Karthika
Pushparaj Karthika
SPSungkwon Park
Sungkwon Park
Due to a proportionally increasing population and food demands, the food industry has come up with wide innovations, opportunities, and possibilities to manufacture meat under in vitro conditions. The amalgamation of cell culture and tissue engineering has been the base idea for the development of the synthetic meat, and this has been proposed to be a pivotal study for a futuristic muscle development program in the medical field. With improved microbial and chemical advancements, in vitro meat matched the conventional meat and is proposed to be eco-friendly, healthy, nutrient rich, and ethical. Despite the success, there are several challenges associated with the utilization of materials in synthetic meat manufacture, which demands regulatory and safety assessment systems to manage the risks associated with the production of cultured meat. The role of 3D bioprinting meat analogues enables a better nutritional profile and sensorial values. The integration of nanosensors in the bioprocess of culture meat eased the quality assessment throughout the food supply chain and management. Multidisciplinary approaches such as mathematical modelling, computer fluid dynamics, and biophotonics coupled with tissue engineering will be promising aspects to envisage the future prospective of this technology and make it available to the public at economically feasible rates.

22 December 2022 in Fishes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Govindharajan SattanathanGovindharajan Sattanathan
Govindharajan Sattanathan
Wen-Chao LiuWen-Chao Liu
Wen-Chao Liu
SPSwaminathan Padmapriya
Swaminathan Padmapriya
PKPushparaj Karthika
Pushparaj Karthika
Shanmugam SureshkumarShanmugam Sureshkumar
Shanmugam Sureshkumar
In Ho KimIn Ho Kim
In Ho Kim
In this study, the effects of a mixed algal blend (Chlorella vulgaris, Euglena viridis, and Spirulina platensis) at different levels were evaluated on growth, hematological immune responses, and expression of immune genes in Labeo rohita against post-challenges of Aeromonas hydrophila. Fish samples were fed a diet containing different levels of mixed blend algal (0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.04 and 0.08% of basal diet). At the end of the feeding period, the fish were challenged with A. hydrophila and fish mortality was recorded over a 14-days period. To evaluate the serum biochemical (albumin, globulin), hematological parameters (Hb, RBC and WBC) and immune parameters (neutrophil activity, lysozyme activity, myeloperoxidase activity, antiprotease activity, ceruloplasmin activity, and bactericidal activity), as well as the expression of immune genes (NKEF-B, Lysozyme C and G, TNF α, TLR22, β2M, and β-actin), fish were sampled on Day 7, 14, 21 and 28. Fish were challenged with virulent A. hydrophila 30 days post-feeding and mortalities were recorded over 30 days post-infection. Results demonstrate that fish fed with a mixed algal blend showed that total body weight gain, specific growth rate, total serum protein, globulin, total hemoglobin content, white blood cells, neutrophil, lysozyme, bactericidal, myeloperoxidase, and antiprotease activity in dietary algae blended application was higher than in the control (p < 0.05). According to the results, relative expression of target genes showed significant increases of 0.02 to 0.04% in the treatment group compared to the control group (p < 0.05). At the end of the 30-day exposure to A. hydrophila, the fish that received the mixed algal blend had a significantly higher rate of survival than the control group, with the highest survival rate recorded in the 0.02% mixed algal blend (p < 0.05). According to the effective results of the mixed algal blend on stimulating the immune system and increasing fish resistance to A. hydrophila, it is recommended to use 0.02 to 0.04% of this mixed algal blend in rohu, L. rohita diets.

8 August 2022 in Chemico-Biological Interactions
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Rajib DasRajib Das
Rajib Das
Abdur RaufAbdur Rauf
Abdur Rauf
SMSaikat Mitra
Saikat Mitra
TETalha Bin Emran
Talha Bin Emran
MHMJ Hossain
MJ Hossain
Jesus Simal-GandaraJesus Simal-Gandara
Jesus Simal-Gandara
The sea is a vast ecosystem that has remained primarily unexploited and untapped, resulting in numerous organisms. Consequently, marine organisms have piqued the interest of scientists as an abundant source of natural resources with unique structural features and fascinating biological activities. Marine macrolide is a top-class natural product with a heavily oxygenated polyene backbone containing macrocyclic lactone. In the last few decades, significant efforts have been made to isolate and characterize macrolides' chemical and biological properties. Numerous macrolides are extracted from different marine organisms such as marine microorganisms, sponges, zooplankton, molluscs, cnidarians, red algae, tunicates, and bryozoans. Notably, the prominent macrolide sources are fungi, dinoflagellates, and sponges. Marine macrolides have several bioactive characteristics such as antimicrobial (antibacterial, antifungal, antimalarial, antiviral), anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic, cytotoxic, and neuroprotective activities. In brief, marine organisms are plentiful in naturally occurring macrolides, which can become the source of efficient and effective therapeutics for many diseases. This current review summarizes these exciting and promising novel marine macrolides in biological activities and possible therapeutic applications.

30 August 2021 in Pharmacological Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LTLokesh Thangamani
Lokesh Thangamani
Balamuralikrishnan BalasubramanianBalamuralikrishnan Balasubramanian
Balamuralikrishnan Balasubramanian
MEMurugesh Easwaran
Murugesh Easwaran
JNJeyakumar Natarajan
Jeyakumar Natarajan
PKPushparaj Karthika
Pushparaj Karthika
SPShanmughavel Piramanayagam
Shanmughavel Piramanayagam

5 April 2023 in Life
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PKPushparaj Karthika
Pushparaj Karthika
Balamuralikrishnan BalasubramanianBalamuralikrishnan Balasubramanian
Balamuralikrishnan Balasubramanian
MPManikantan Pappuswamy
Manikantan Pappuswamy
VAVijaya Anand Arumugam
Vijaya Anand Arumugam
Kaliannan DurairajKaliannan Durairaj
Kaliannan Durairaj
SPSungkwon Park
Sungkwon Park
Advancements and developments in the 3D bioprinting have been promising and have met the needs of organ transplantation. Current improvements in tissue engineering constructs have enhanced their applications in regenerative medicines and other medical fields. The synergistic effects of 3D bioprinting have brought technologies such as tissue engineering, microfluidics, integrated tissue organ printing, in vivo bioprinted tissue implants, artificial intelligence and machine learning approaches together. These have greatly impacted interventions in medical fields, such as medical implants, multi-organ-on-chip models, prosthetics, drug testing tissue constructs and much more. This technological leap has offered promising personalized solutions for patients with chronic diseases, and neurodegenerative disorders, and who have been in severe accidents. This review discussed the various standing printing methods, such as inkjet, extrusion, laser-assisted, digital light processing, and stereolithographic 3D bioprinter models, adopted for tissue constructs. Additionally, the properties of natural, synthetic, cell-laden, dECM-based, short peptides, nanocomposite and bioactive bioinks are briefly discussed. Sequels of several tissue-laden constructs such as skin, bone and cartilage, liver, kidney, smooth muscles, cardiac and neural tissues are briefly analyzed. Challenges, future perspectives and the impact of microfluidics in resolving the limitations in the field, along with 3D bioprinting, are discussed. Certainly, a technology gap still exists in the scaling up, industrialization and commercialization of this technology for the benefit of stakeholders.