Rabeea Noor

Ms. Rabeea Noor


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2023 in Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MWMuhammad Waqas
Muhammad Waqas
SHSarfraz Hashim
Sarfraz Hashim
Usa HumphriesUsa Humphries
Usa Humphries
Shakeel AhmadShakeel Ahmad
Shakeel Ahmad
RNRabeea Noor
Rabeea Noor
HLHnin Aye Lin
Hnin Aye Lin
Composting is the most adaptable and fruitful method for managing biodegradable solid wastes; it is a crucial agricultural practice that contributes to recycling farm and agricultural wastes. Composting is profitable for various plant, animal, and synthetic wastes, from residential bins to large corporations. Composting and agricultural waste management (AWM) practices flourish in developing countries, especially Pakistan. Composting has advantages over other AWM practices, such as landfilling agricultural waste, which increases the potential for pollution of groundwater by leachate, while composting reduces water contamination. Furthermore, waste is burned, open-dumped on land surfaces, and disposed of into bodies of water, leading to environmental and global warming concerns. Among AWM practices, composting is an environment-friendly and cost-effective practice for agricultural waste disposal. This review investigates improved AWM via various conventional and emerging composting processes and stages: composting, underlying mechanisms, and factors that influence composting of discrete crop residue, municipal solid waste (MSW), and biomedical waste (BMW). Additionally, this review describes and compares conventional and emerging composting. In the conclusion, current trends and future composting possibilities are summarized and reviewed. Recent developments in composting for AWM are highlighted in this critical review; various recommendations are developed to aid its technological growth, recognize its advantages, and increase research interest in composting processes.

14 November 2022 in Land
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Chaitanya Baliram PandeChaitanya Baliram Pande
Chaitanya Baliram Pande
Nadhir Al-AnsariNadhir Al-Ansari
Nadhir Al-Ansari
Nand Lal KushwahaNand Lal Kushwaha
Nand Lal Kushwaha
Aman SrivastavaAman Srivastava
Aman Srivastava
RNRabeea Noor
Rabeea Noor
Ahmed ElbeltagiAhmed Elbeltagi
Ahmed Elbeltagi
Climate change has caused droughts to increase in frequency and severity worldwide, which has attracted scientists to create drought prediction models to mitigate the impacts of droughts. One of the most important challenges in addressing droughts is developing accurate models to predict their discrete characteristics, i.e., occurrence, duration, and severity. The current research examined the performance of several different machine learning models, including Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and M5P Tree in forecasting the most widely used drought measure, the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), at both discrete time scales (SPI 3, SPI 6). The drought model was developed utilizing rainfall data from two stations in India (i.e., Angangaon and Dahalewadi) for 2000–2019, wherein the first 14 years are employed for model training, while the remaining six years are employed for model validation. The subset regression analysis was performed on 12 different input combinations to choose the best input combination for SPI 3 and SPI 6. The sensitivity analysis was carried out on the given best input combination to find the most effective parameter for forecasting. The performance of all the developed models for ANN (4, 5), ANN (5, 6), ANN (6, 7), and M5P models was assessed through the different statistical indicators, namely, MAE, RMSE, RAE, RRSE, and r. The results revealed that SPI (t-1) is the most sensitive parameters with highest values of β = 0.916, 1.017, respectively, for SPI-3 and SPI-6 prediction at both stations on the best input combinations i.e., combination 7 (SPI-1/SPI-3/SPI-4/SPI-5/SPI-8/SPI-9/SPI-11) and combination 4 (SPI-1/SPI-2/SPI-6/SPI-7) based on the higher values of R2 and Adjusted R2 while the lowest values of MSE values. It is clear from the performance of models that the M5P model has higher r values and lesser RMSE values as compared to ANN (4, 5), ANN (5, 6), and ANN (6, 7) models. Therefore, the M5P model was superior to other developed models at both stations.

5 January 2023 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RNRabeea Noor
Rabeea Noor
Arfan ArshadArfan Arshad
Arfan Arshad
MSMuhammad Shafeeque
Muhammad Shafeeque
Jinping LiuJinping Liu
Jinping Liu
ABAzhar Baig
Azhar Baig
Ahmed ElbeltagiAhmed Elbeltagi
Ahmed Elbeltagi
Understanding the pixel-scale hydrology and the spatiotemporal distribution of regional precipitation requires high precision and high-resolution precipitation data. Satellite-based precipitation products have coarse spatial resolutions (~10 km–75 km), rendering them incapable of translating high-resolution precipitation variability induced by dynamic interactions between climatic forcing, ground cover, and altitude variations. This study investigates the performance of a downscaled-calibration procedure to generate fine-scale (1 km × 1 km) gridded precipitation estimates from the coarser resolution of TRMM data (~25 km) in the Indus Basin. The mixed geographically weighted regression (MGWR) and random forest (RF) models were utilized to spatially downscale the TRMM precipitation data using high-resolution (1 km × 1 km) explanatory variables. Downscaled precipitation estimates were combined with APHRODITE rain gauge-based data using the calibration procedure (geographical ratio analysis (GRA)). Results indicated that the MGWR model performed better on fit and accuracy than the RF model to predict the precipitation. Annual TRMM estimates after downscaling and calibration not only translate the spatial heterogeneity of precipitation but also improved the agreement with rain gauge observations with a reduction in RMSE and bias of ~88 mm/year and 27%, respectively. Significant improvement was also observed in monthly (and daily) precipitation estimates with a higher reduction in RMSE and bias of ~30 mm mm/month (0.92 mm/day) and 10.57% (3.93%), respectively, after downscaling and calibration procedures. In general, the higher reduction in bias values after downscaling and calibration procedures was noted across the downstream low elevation zones (e.g., zone 1 correspond to elevation changes from 0 to 500 m). The low performance of precipitation products across the elevation zone 3 (>1000 m) might be associated with the fact that satellite observations at high-altitude regions with glacier coverage are most likely subjected to higher uncertainties. The high-resolution grided precipitation data generated by the MGWR-based proposed framework can facilitate the characterization of distributed hydrology in the Indus Basin. The method may have strong adoptability in the other catchments of the world, with varying climates and topography conditions.