DEVENDRA KUMAR

Dr. DEVENDRA KUMAR

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 August 2017 in Biological Rhythm Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DKDEVENDRA KUMAR
DEVENDRA KUMAR
BYBrijesh Yadav
Brijesh Yadav
SCSoumen Choudhury
Soumen Choudhury
PKPriyambada Kumari
Priyambada Kumari
AMArun Kumar Madan
Arun Kumar Madan
SYSarvajeet Yadav
Sarvajeet Yadav

1 October 2018 in Cryobiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VRVidya Sagar Reddy
Vidya Sagar Reddy
BYBrijesh Yadav
Brijesh Yadav
CYChhote Lal Yadav
Chhote Lal Yadav
MAMukul Anand
Mukul Anand
DSDilip Kumar Swain
Dilip Kumar Swain
SYSarvajeet Yadav
Sarvajeet Yadav

18 December 2017 in Parasite Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PKP. Kumari
P. Kumari
RNR. Nigam
R. Nigam
SCS. Choudhury
S. Choudhury
SSShanker Kumar Singh
Shanker Kumar Singh
BYB. Yadav
B. Yadav
SGS. K. Garg
S. K. Garg

8 April 2019 in Biological Rhythm Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DKDEVENDRA KUMAR
DEVENDRA KUMAR
NMNisha Malik
Nisha Malik
RSR. S. Sengar
R. S. Sengar
Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) is an economic crop cultivated in the tropical and subtropical zones. It is the world’s major crop according to production quantity. Sugarcane crop faces all types of environmental constraints due to its long life cycle period. Among various stresses, water stress creates a major obstacle to sugarcane production. Water deficit during formative stage in sugarcane causes more deleterious effect on crop growth. Plants develop mechanism to perceive external stress signals and adapt by changing in their physiological and biochemical responses. Therefore, this experiment was undertaken to elucidate the changes occur in to physiological and biochemical parameters under water stress in ten sugarcane genotypes. The water stress was applied by water suppression during formative stage (120–150 days). The third fully expanded leaf from random plant of each biological replication was collected on 120th day (irrigated condition), 135th day and 150th day after applying water stress. The obtained results showed significant differences among physio-biochemical responses in all genotypes. Minor fluctuations in physio-biochemical observations were found to be in 15 days of water stress, whereas higher level of percent changes were to be noted in samples of 30 days water stress. A minimum reduction in RWC, MSI, SCMR value, NR activity and higher increase in proline accumulation, catalase, peroxidase activities were found to be in sugarcane genotypes Co 98014, Co 0118, CoPk 05191, Co 0238 and Co 05011. Whereas the genotype Co 89003 and CoJ 64 were more affected in both stress treatment.

23 May 2024 in Crops
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAlok Kumar Singh
Alok Kumar Singh
DKDEVENDRA KUMAR
DEVENDRA KUMAR
Donato GemmatiDonato Gemmati
Donato Gemmati
RERanjith Kumar Ellur
Ranjith Kumar Ellur
ASAshutosh Singh
Ashutosh Singh
Ajay Vikram SinghAjay Vikram Singh
Ajay Vikram Singh
Genetic variability in rice breeding programs plays a very crucial role. It provides an outstanding pool of superior alleles governing better agronomic and quality characters through association mapping. For a greater understanding of population structure, the genetic relationship among different rice lines is indispensable prior to the setting of a correlation among dynamic alleles and traits. In the present investigation, the genetic diversity and population structure of 116 rice accessions were studied to understand genetic relatedness and diversity among them using 64 polymorphic SSR markers. A genotyping assessment based on SSR markers revealed a total of 225 alleles, with an average PIC value of 0.755. The germplasm lines were classified into three distinct subgroups through population structure analysis, utilizing both model- and distance-based approaches. AMOVA analysis showed that 11% of the total variation could be attributed to differences between groups, while the remaining 89% was likely due to differences within groups. This study suggested that population structure and genetic relatedness should be considered to establish marker–trait associations for association mapping when working with the core collection of germplasm lines.