Adriana Henriques

Prof. Dr. Adriana Henriques

Nursing Research, Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon (CIDNUR), Community Nurse Department, Nursing School of Lisbon, 1900-160 Lisbon, Portugal
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 March 2021 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Andreia CostaAndreia Costa
Andreia Costa
CSC Joana Sousa
C Joana Sousa
Paulo SeabraPaulo Seabra
Paulo Seabra
AVAna Virgolino
Ana Virgolino
OSOsvaldo Santos
Osvaldo Santos
Violeta AlarcãoVioleta Alarcão
Violeta Alarcão
Social prescribing (SP) is an approach that promotes the use of local non-clinical activities by people. The referral is usually made by primary health-care professionals, in a process wherein local providers play a pivotal role. The main objective of this study was to identify domains of intervention and evidence about the effectiveness of SP programs regarding health-related outcomes. A systematic literature review was carried out following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, CINHAL, and SCOPUS. Inclusion criteria of the reviewed papers were as follows: (i) effectiveness studies of interventions designated as SP or interventions entailing SP conceptual components; (ii) interventions with adults. Quality assessment was performed with the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials; an assessment tool developed by the US National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute was applied to observational studies. Overall, 13 articles were included for analysis, with a total of 4603 patients. Although three studies comprised a control group, only two followed a randomized controlled trials (RCT) design. Nine principal domains of intervention within SP were identified, with three categories of outcome measures: Physical and psychological wellbeing; Health behaviors and self-efficacy; and Health care resources end economic evaluation. SP is an emergent and promising health-care intervention, and it has been used to promote different health behaviors. Evidence of SP effectiveness on patient’s health and wellbeing is not strong. Further research is needed for understanding how SP can be applied efficiently.

13 June 2020 in Journal of Medical Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JSJoão Balsa da Silva
João Balsa da Silva
IFIsa Félix
Isa Félix
ACAna Paula Cláudio
Ana Paula Cláudio
MCMaria Beatriz Carmo
Maria Beatriz Carmo
ISIsabel Costa e Silva
Isabel Costa e Silva
MGMara Pereira Guerreiro
Mara Pereira Guerreiro

17 May 2018 in Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LBLuciene Braga
Luciene Braga
Pedro ParreiraPedro Parreira
Pedro Parreira
ASAnabela Salgueiro-Oliveira
Anabela Salgueiro-Oliveira
LMLisete dos Santos Mendes Mónico
Lisete dos Santos Mendes Mónico
CACristina Arreguy-Sena
Cristina Arreguy-Sena
Adriana HenriquesAdriana Henriques
Adriana Henriques
Objective: to determine the incidence rate and risk factors for the nursing-sensitive indicators phlebitis and infiltration in patients with peripheral venous catheters (PVCs). Method: cohort study with 110 patients. Scales were used to assess and document phlebitis and infiltration. Socio-demographic variables, clinical variables related to the PVC, medication and hospitalization variables were collected. Descriptive and inferential analysis and multivariate logistic models were used. Results: the incidence rate of phlebitis and infiltration was respectively 43.2 and 59.7 per 1000 catheter-days. Most PVCs with these vascular traumas were removed in the first 24 hours. Risk factors for phlebitis were: length of hospital stay (p=0.042) and number of catheters inserted (p<0.001); risk factors for infiltration were: piperacillin/tazobactan (p=0.024) and the number of catheters inserted (p<0.001). Conclusion: the investigation documented the incidence of nursing-sensitive indicators (phlebitis and infiltration) and revealed new risk factors related to infiltration. It also allowed a reflection on the nursing care necessary to prevent these vascular traumas and on the indications and contraindications of the PVC, supporting the implementation of the PICC as an alternative to PVC.

1 February 2021 in Nursing & Health Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LVLaura Visiers-Jiménez
Laura Visiers-Jiménez
ASArja Suikkala
Arja Suikkala
LSLeena Salminen
Leena Salminen
HLHelena Leino‐Kilpi
Helena Leino‐Kilpi
ELEliisa Löyttyniemi
Eliisa Löyttyniemi
SKSatu Kajander-Unkuri
Satu Kajander-Unkuri
The purpose of this study was to explore nursing students' perceptions of their final clinical learning environment and its association with their self‐assessed competence, satisfaction with nursing education, and turnover intentions at graduation in six European countries. A multi‐country comparative cross‐sectional study was conducted with nursing students (n = 1746) from the Czech Republic, Finland, Italy, Portugal, Slovakia, and Spain using the Nurse Competence Scale and the Clinical Learning Environment and Supervision scale. Nursing students' overall perceptions of their final clinical learning environment and supervision were positive in all the countries studied. The correlation between the students' perceptions of their final clinical learning environment and competence was statistically significant and positive. Satisfaction with the nursing program and clinical practicum and no consideration of career change were related to positive perceptions of the final clinical learning environment. Highlighting the importance of the supervisory relationship and pedagogical atmosphere, nursing students' positive perceptions of the final clinical learning environment and supervision contribute to a better level of self‐assessed competence and satisfaction with the nursing program and clinical practicum, leading to lower turnover intentions.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASArmando David de Sousa
Armando David de Sousa
Cristina Lavareda BaixinhoCristina Lavareda Baixinho
Cristina Lavareda Baixinho
MPMaria Presado
Maria Presado
Adriana HenriquesAdriana Henriques
Adriana Henriques
Background: The 12-month prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders related to work (MDRW) in nurses rests between 71.8% to 84%, so it is urgent to develop preventive intervention programs with the purpose of avoiding negative physical, psychological, socioeconomic, and working aspects. There are several intervention programs aimed at preventing musculoskeletal disorders related to work for nurses, but few have successfully proven results. Despite the evidence pointing to the benefits of multidimensional intervention programs, it is essential to determine which interventions have positive effects on the prevention of this kind of disorder to create an effective intervention plan. Aim: This review intends to identify the different interventions adopted in the prevention of musculoskeletal disorders related to work in nurses and to compare the effectiveness of these interventions, providing the appropriate and scientific basis for building an intervention to prevent musculoskeletal disorders in nurses. Method: This Systematic Review was guided by the research question, “What are the effects of musculoskeletal disorders preventive interventions on nursing practice?” and carried out in different databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, SCOPUS, and Science Direct). Later, the results were submitted to the eligibility criteria, the appraisal quality of the papers, and the data synthesis was performed. Results: 13 articles were identified for analysis. The interventions implemented to control the risk were: training patient-handling devices; ergonomics education; involving the management chain; handling protocol/algorithms; acquiring ergonomics equipment; and no-manual lifting. Conclusions: The studies associated two or more interventions, the majority of which (11 studies) were training-handling devices and ergonomics education, therefore emerging as the most effective instruments in the prevention of MDRW. The studies did not associate interventions that cover all risk factors (individual, associated with the nature of the work, organizational, and psychological aspects). This systematic review can help with making recommendations for other studies that should associate organizational measures and prevention policies with physical exercise and other measures aimed at individual and psychosocial risk factors.

9 August 2012 in Journal of Clinical Nursing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Adriana HenriquesAdriana Henriques
Adriana Henriques
MCMaria A Costa
Maria A Costa
JCJosé Cabrita
José Cabrita