To describe current practices for manual wheelchair (MWC) skills training in Canadian rehabilitation centers. An online survey was sent to practice leaders in occupational (OT) and physical therapy (PT) at 87 Canadian rehabilitation centers. Responses were solicited from individuals who could report about wheelchair skills training at facilities with at least 10 beds designated for rehabilitation. Thirty-four questions asked about: (1) demographics, (2) components of MWC training, (3) amount of MWC skills training, (4) use of validated programs and (5) perceived barriers to using validated programs. Data were analyzed using summary statistics. About 68/87 responses were received primarily from OTs (42/68). Basic MWC skills training (e.g. wheel-locks) was consistently part of clinical practice (45/68), while advanced skills training (e.g. curb-cuts) was rare (8/68). On an average, 1-4 h of training was done (29/68). Validated training programs were used by 16/68, most of whom used them "rarely" (7/16). Common barriers to using validated programs were lack of time (43/68) and resources (39/68). Learning to use a wheelchair is important for those with ambulation impairments because the wheelchair enables mobility and social participation. Providing opportunities for advanced wheelchair skills training may enhance mobility and social participation in a safe manner. Implications for Rehabilitation There is evidence confirming the benefits of a validated wheelchair skills program, yet most clinicians do no not use them. A variety of perceived barriers may help to explain the limited use of existing programs, such as time, resources and knowledge. Effective knowledge translation efforts may help alleviate some of these barriers, and novel wheelchair training approaches may alleviate some burden on clinicians to help accommodate the increasing number of older wheelchair users.

To evaluate the effect of a peer-led wheelchair training program on self-efficacy of manual wheelchair (MWC) use and to explore influences of the intervention on MWC skills, life-space mobility, and satisfaction with participation. Pilot randomized controlled trial. Rehabilitation center and community. Community-living MWC users (N=28; mean MWC experience, 13y; mean age, 49y; 6 [21%] women). The experimental group (n=16) received six 1.5-hour sessions of a peer-led self-efficacy-enhanced wheelchair training program (WheelSee). On the basis of individualized goals, peer trainers administered WheelSee to pairs of MWC users. The control group (n=12) received no intervention. The primary outcome--wheelchair use self-efficacy--was assessed using the Wheelchair Use Confidence Scale (WheelCon) version 3.0. Secondary outcomes included wheelchair skills capacity and performance (Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire version 4.1), life-space mobility (Life Space Assessment), and satisfaction with participation (Wheelchair Outcome Measure). Controlling for baseline scores, an analysis of covariance revealed that WheelSee had a large statistically significant effect on MWC use self-efficacy in community-living adult MWC users (Cohen d=1.4; P=.002) than in a control group. WheelSee also had a large statistically significant effect on MWC skills capacity (Cohen d=1.3; P=.003) and performance (Cohen d=1.0; P=.02). There were no statistically significant differences in life-space mobility or satisfaction with participation scores between the groups. A peer-led MWC training program improves wheelchair use self-efficacy in adult MWC users and had a positive influence on other wheelchair-related outcomes. WheelSee may offer a promising intervention strategy to accommodate the training needs of community-living MWC users.

Background: Wearable activity monitors such as ActiGraph monitoring devices are widely used, especially in research settings. Various research studies have assessed the criterion validity of ActiGraph devices for step counting and distance estimation in adults and older adults. Although several studies have used the ActiGraph devices as a reference system for activity monitoring, there is no summarized evidence of the psychometric properties. The main objective of this systematic review was to summarize evidence related to the criterion validity of ActiGraph monitoring devices for step counting and distance estimation in adults and/or older adults. Methods: Literature searches were conducted in six databases (Medline (OVID), Embase, IEEExplore, CINAHL, Engineering Village and Web of Science). Two reviewers independently conducted selection, a quality analysis of articles (using COSMIN and MacDermid’s grids) and data extraction. Results: This review included 21 studies involving 637 participants (age 30.3 ± 7.5 years (for adults) and 82.7 ± 3.3 years (for older adults)). Five ActiGraph devices (7164, GT1M, wGTX +, GT3X +/wGT3X + and wGT3X − BT) were used to collect data at the hip, wrist and ankle to assess various walking and running speeds (ranging from 0.2 m/s to 4.44 m/s) over durations of 2 min to 3 days (13 h 30 mins per day) for step counting and distance estimation. The ActiGraph GT3X +/wGT3X + and wGT3X − BT had better criterion validity than the ActiGraph 7164, wGTX + and GT1M according to walking and running speeds for step counting. Validity of ActiGraph wGT3X + was good for distance estimation. Conclusion: The ActiGraph wGT3X − BT and GT3X +/wGT3X + have good criterion validity for step counting, under certain conditions related to walking speeds, positioning and data processing.