Janelle Angela Skinner

Dr. Janelle Angela Skinner

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 August 2017 in Behavioral Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Tracy BurrowsTracy Burrows
Tracy Burrows
JSJanelle Angela Skinner
Janelle Angela Skinner
RMRebecca McKenna
Rebecca McKenna
MRMegan Rollo
Megan Rollo
Existing research suggests that there is an overlap between binge eating disorder (BED) and the construct of ‘food addiction’ (FA). The objective of this study was to determine the overlapping features of BED and FA through a comparison of the individual scales of commonly used tools including the Binge Eating Scale (BES) and the Yale Food Addiction Scale (YFAS) in a sample of Australian adults. Adults (>18 years of age) were invited to complete an anonymous online survey on FA. Binge eating was assessed through the BES and addictive eating behaviours were assessed through the YFAS (n = 1344). The prevalence and severity of both FA and binge eating increased across weight categories. The overall correlation between the total score from the BES and FA symptoms was r = 0.76, p < 0.001; for females it was r = 0.77, p < 0.001, and for males it was r = 0.65, p < 0.001. Total BES score and the BES emotion factor were most often associated with FA symptoms, as was demonstrated to produce stronger correlations with FA symptoms. In contrast, the BES behaviour factor was less strongly associated to FA with the majority of correlations <0.6. This study demonstrates the overlap between BED and FA, and highlights the possible unique differences between the forms of disordered eating.

30 December 2021 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Kirrilly PurseyKirrilly Pursey
Kirrilly Pursey
JSJanelle Angela Skinner
Janelle Angela Skinner
MLMark Leary
Mark Leary
Tracy BurrowsTracy Burrows
Tracy Burrows
(1) Background: Research suggests that certain foods may have addictive effects; however, no reviews have systematically appraised studies in this area. The aims of this review were to determine the nutrients, foods and dietary patterns associated with addictive eating. (2) Methods: Published studies up to November 2020 were identified through searches of 6 electronic databases. Eligible studies included those in in children and adults that reported dietary intakes of individuals with ‘food addiction’. (3) Results: Fifteen studies (n = 12 in adults and n = 3 in children/adolescents with Yale Food Addiction Scale defined ‘food addiction’) were included. Foods commonly associated with addictive eating were those high in a combination of fat and refined carbohydrates. Generally, intakes of energy, carbohydrates and fats were significantly higher in individuals with addictive eating compared to those without. (4) Conclusions: Due to the heterogeneity in study methodologies and outcomes across included studies, it is difficult to conclude if any specific foods, nutrients or dietary patterns facilitate an addictive process. Further research is needed to elucidate potential associations. However, present addictive eating treatment approaches could incorporate individualised dietary advice targeting foods high in fat and refined carbohydrates.

24 April 2018 in JMIR Cardio
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RMRebecca A McKenna
Rebecca A McKenna
MRMegan Rollo
Megan Rollo
JSJanelle Angela Skinner
Janelle Angela Skinner
Tracy BurrowsTracy Burrows
Tracy Burrows
Food addiction has a long history; however, there has been a substantial increase in published literature and public media focus in the past decade. Food addiction has previously demonstrated an overlap with overweight and obesity, a risk for cardiovascular disease. This increased focus has led to the establishment of numerous support options for addictive eating behaviors, yet evidence-based support options are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the availability and content of support options, accessible online, for food addiction. A standardized Web search was conducted using 4 search engines to identify current support availability for food addiction. Through use of a comprehensive data extraction sheet, 2 reviewers independently extracted data related to the program or intervention characteristics, and support fidelity including fundamentals, support modality, social support offered, program or intervention origins, member numbers, and program or intervention evaluation. Of the 800 records retrieved, 13 (1.6%, 13/800) websites met the inclusion criteria. All 13 websites reported originating in the United States, and 1 website reported member numbers. The use of credentialed health professionals was reported by only 3 websites, and 5 websites charged a fee-for-service. The use of the 12 steps or traditions was evident in 11 websites, and 9 websites described the use of food plans. In total, 6 websites stated obligatory peer support, and 11 websites featured spirituality as a main theme of delivery. Moreover, 12 websites described phone meetings as the main program delivery modality, with 7 websites stating face-to-face delivery and 4 opting for online meetings. Newsletters (n=5), closed social media groups (n=5), and retreat programs (n=5) were the most popular forms of social support. This is the first review to analyze online support options for food addiction. Very few online support options include health professionals, and a strengthening argument is forming for an increase in support options for food addiction. This review forms part of this argument by showing a lack of evidence-based options. By reviewing current support availability, it can provide a guide toward the future development of evidence-based support for food addiction.

1 January 2019 in Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJanelle Angela Skinner
Janelle Angela Skinner
ECErin J. Campbell
Erin J. Campbell
CDChristopher V. Dayas
Christopher V. Dayas
Manohar GargManohar Garg
Manohar Garg
Tracy BurrowsTracy Burrows
Tracy Burrows

6 June 2023 in BMJ Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJanelle Angela Skinner
Janelle Angela Skinner
MWMegan Whatnall
Megan Whatnall
MLMark Leary
Mark Leary
RCRebecca A Collins
Rebecca A Collins
KPKirrilly M Pursey
Kirrilly M Pursey
Tracy BurrowsTracy Burrows
Tracy Burrows
Introduction: Approximately 15%–20% of the adult population self-report symptoms of addictive eating. There are currently limited options for management. Motivational interviewing-based interventions, containing personalised coping skills training, have been found to be effective for behaviour change in addictive disorders (eg, alcohol). This project builds upon foundations of an addictive eating feasibility study previously conducted and co-design process involving consumers. The primary aim of this study is to examine the efficacy of a telehealth intervention targeting addictive eating symptoms in Australian adults compared with passive intervention and control groups. Methods and analysis: This three-arm randomised controlled trial will recruit participants 18–85 years, endorsing ≥3 symptoms on the Yale Food Addiction Scale (YFAS) 2.0, with body mass index >18.5 kg/m2. Addictive eating symptoms are assessed at baseline (pre-intervention), 3 months (post-intervention) and 6 months. Other outcomes include dietary intake and quality, depression, anxiety, stress, quality of life, physical activity and sleep hygiene. Using a multicomponent clinician-led approach, the active intervention consists of five telehealth sessions (15–45 min each) delivered by a dietitian over 3 months. The intervention uses personalised feedback, skill-building exercises, reflective activities and goal setting. Participants are provided with a workbook and website access. The passive intervention group receives the intervention via a self-guided approach with access to the workbook and website (no telehealth). The control group receives personalised written dietary feedback at baseline and participants advised to follow their usual dietary pattern for 6 months. The control group will be offered the passive intervention after 6 months. The primary endpoint is YFAS symptom scores at 3 months. A cost–consequence analysis will determine intervention costs alongside mean change outcomes. Ethics and dissemination: Human Research Ethics Committee of University of Newcastle, Australia provided approval (H-2021-0100). Findings will be disseminated via publication in peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations, community presentations and student theses. Trial registration number: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621001079831).

2 March 2021 in Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MWMegan Whatnall
Megan Whatnall
JSJanelle Angela Skinner
Janelle Angela Skinner
KPKirrilly Pursey
Kirrilly Pursey
KBKatherine Brain
Katherine Brain
RCRebecca Anne Collins
Rebecca Anne Collins
Tracy BurrowsTracy Burrows
Tracy Burrows