Lawrence, Obado Osuwat

Mr. Lawrence, Obado Osuwat

Soroti University, School of Health Sciences
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 June 2021 in Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Keneth Iceland KasoziKeneth Iceland Kasozi
Keneth Iceland Kasozi
GZGerald Zirintunda
Gerald Zirintunda
Fred SsempijjaFred Ssempijja
Fred Ssempijja
BBBridget Buyinza
Bridget Buyinza
KAKhalid J. Alzahrani
Khalid J. Alzahrani
Susan Christina WelburnSusan Christina Welburn
Susan Christina Welburn
While both human and animal trypanosomiasis continue to present as major human and animal public health constraints globally, detailed analyses of trypanosome wildlife reservoir hosts remain sparse. African animal trypanosomiasis (AAT) affects both livestock and wildlife carrying a significant risk of spillover and cross-transmission of species and strains between populations. Increased human activity together with pressure on land resources is increasing wildlife–livestock–human infections. Increasing proximity between human settlements and grazing lands to wildlife reserves and game parks only serves to exacerbate zoonotic risk. Communities living and maintaining livestock on the fringes of wildlife-rich ecosystems require to have in place methods of vector control for prevention of AAT transmission and for the treatment of their livestock. Major Trypanosoma spp. include Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense, Trypanosoma brucei gambiense, and Trypanosoma cruzi, pathogenic for humans, and Trypanosoma vivax, Trypanosoma congolense, Trypanosoma evansi, Trypanosoma brucei brucei, Trypanosoma dionisii, Trypanosoma thomasbancrofti, Trypanosma elephantis, Trypanosoma vegrandis, Trypanosoma copemani, Trypanosoma irwini, Trypanosoma copemani, Trypanosoma gilletti, Trypanosoma theileri, Trypanosoma godfreyi, Trypansoma simiae, and Trypanosoma (Megatrypanum) pestanai. Wildlife hosts for the trypansomatidae include subfamilies of Bovinae, Suidae, Pantherinae, Equidae, Alcephinae, Cercopithecinae, Crocodilinae, Pteropodidae, Peramelidae, Sigmodontidae, and Meliphagidae. Wildlife species are generally considered tolerant to trypanosome infection following centuries of coexistence of vectors and wildlife hosts. Tolerance is influenced by age, sex, species, and physiological condition and parasite challenge. Cyclic transmission through Glossina species occurs for T. congolense, T. simiae, T. vivax, T. brucei, and T. b. rhodesiense, T. b. gambiense, and within Reduviid bugs for T. cruzi. T. evansi is mechanically transmitted, and T. vixax is also commonly transmitted by biting flies including tsetse. Wildlife animal species serve as long-term reservoirs of infection, but the delicate acquired balance between trypanotolerance and trypanosome challenge can be disrupted by an increase in challenge and/or the introduction of new more virulent species into the ecosystem. There is a need to protect wildlife, animal, and human populations from the infectious consequences of encroachment to preserve and protect these populations. In this review, we explore the ecology and epidemiology of Trypanosoma spp. in wildlife.

23 July 2021 in Life
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMohamed Moubarak
Mohamed Moubarak
Keneth Iceland KasoziKeneth Iceland Kasozi
Keneth Iceland Kasozi
Helal HettaHelal Hetta
Helal Hetta
Hazem ShaheenHazem Shaheen
Hazem Shaheen
Abdur RaufAbdur Rauf
Abdur Rauf
GBGaber El-Saber Batiha
Gaber El-Saber Batiha
Novel therapies for the treatment of COVID-19 are continuing to emerge as the SARS-Cov-2 pandemic progresses. PCR remains the standard benchmark for initial diagnosis of COVID-19 infection, while advances in immunological profiling are guiding clinical treatment. The SARS-Cov-2 virus has undergone multiple mutations since its emergence in 2019, resulting in changes in virulence that have impacted on disease severity globally. The emergence of more virulent variants of SARS-Cov-2 remains challenging for effective disease control during this pandemic. Major variants identified to date include B.1.1.7, B.1.351; P.1; B.1.617.2; B.1.427; P.2; P.3; B.1.525; and C.37. Globally, large unvaccinated populations increase the risk of more and more variants arising. With successive waves of COVID-19 emerging, strategies that mitigate against community transmission need to be implemented, including increased vaccination coverage. For treatment, convalescent plasma therapy, successfully deployed during recent Ebola outbreaks and for H1N1 influenza, can increase survival rates and improve host responses to viral challenge. Convalescent plasma is rich with cytokines (IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, IL-17, and IL-8), CCL2, and TNFα, neutralizing antibodies, and clotting factors essential for the management of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Clinical trials can inform and guide treatment policy, leading to mainstream adoption of convalescent therapy. This review examines the limited number of clinical trials published, to date that have deployed this therapy and explores clinical trials in progress for the treatment of COVID-19.

15 August 2013 in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EIEmil Ivan
Emil Ivan
NCNigel Crowther
Nigel Crowther
EMEugene Mutimura
Eugene Mutimura
LOLawrence, Obado Osuwat
Lawrence, Obado Osuwat
SJSaskia Janssen
Saskia Janssen
MGMartin P. Grobusch
Martin P. Grobusch
Within sub-Saharan Africa, helminth and malaria infections cause considerable morbidity in HIV-positive pregnant women and their offspring. Helminth infections are also associated with a higher risk of mother-to-child HIV transmission. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of, and the protective and risk factors for helminth and malaria infections in pregnant HIV-positive Rwandan women receiving anti-retroviral therapy (ART). Pregnant females (n = 980) were recruited from health centres in rural and peri-urban locations in the central and eastern provinces of Rwanda. Helminth infection was diagnosed using the Kato Katz method whilst the presence of Plasmodium falciparum was identified from blood smears. The prevalence of helminth infections was 34.3%; of malaria 13.3%, and of co-infections 6.6%. Helminth infections were more common in rural (43.1%) than peri-urban (18.0%; p<0.0005) sites. A CD4 count ≤350 cells/mm3 was associated with a higher risk of helminth infections (odds ratio, 3.39; 95% CIs, 2.16–5.33; p<0.0005) and malaria (3.37 [2.11–5.38]; p<0.0005) whilst helminth infection was a risk factor for malaria infection and vice versa. Education and employment reduced the risk of all types of infection whilst hand washing protected against helminth infection (0.29 [0.19–0.46]; p<0.0005);). The TDF-3TC-NVP (3.47 [2.21–5.45]; p<0.0005), D4T-3TC-NVP (2.47 [1.27–4.80]; p<0.05) and AZT-NVP (2.60 [1.33–5.08]; p<0.05) regimens each yielded higher helminth infection rates than the AZT-3TC-NVP regimen. Anti-retroviral therapy had no effect on the risk of malaria. HIV-positive pregnant women would benefit from the scaling up of de-worming programs alongside health education and hygiene interventions. The differential effect of certain ART combinations (as observed here most strongly with AZT-3TC-NVP) possibly protecting against helminth infection warrants further investigation. There is an overlap in the worldwide distribution of intestinal worms (helminths), malaria and HIV. Co-infections with helminth and malaria parasites cause a significant problem in the host, particularly in the presence of HIV infection. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of intestinal worm and malaria infection and co-infections and the associated risk factors among HIV-positive pregnant women that attended rural and peri-urban health centers in Rwanda. Our findings indicate that intestinal worms were more common among HIV-infected pregnant women in the rural than peri-urban settings. HIV-positive pregnant women who had lower CD4 cell counts were more at risk of being infected by intestinal worms and malaria. Malaria also increased the risk of being infected by intestinal worms and vice versa. Socio-economic factors such as lack of education and unemployment were among the risk factors for intestinal worm infections and malaria. Hand washing was found to reduce the risk for worm infections; whilst one particular ART combination (AZT-3TC-NVP) led to a reduced rate of helminth infections when compared to others.

11 February 2021 in Frontiers in Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Keneth Iceland KasoziKeneth Iceland Kasozi
Keneth Iceland Kasozi
YHYunusu Hamira
Yunusu Hamira
GZGerald Zirintunda
Gerald Zirintunda
KAKhalaf F. Alsharif
Khalaf F. Alsharif
Farag AltalbawyFarag Altalbawy
Farag Altalbawy
OOOchan Otim
Ochan Otim
In this study, we initiated an effort to generate information about beef safety in Uganda. Our entry point was to assess by atomic absorption spectrophotometry the levels of essential elements copper (Cu), cobalt (Co), iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn), and non-essential elements lead (Pb), chromium (Cr), nickel (Ni), and cadmium (Cd) in 40 beef samples collected from within and around Soroti (Uganda). The information was used to evaluate the safety of consuming such beef against the World Health Organization (WHO) limits. The latter was accomplished by (i) estimating the daily intake (EDI) of each metal in the study area, (ii) modeling the non-cancer health risk using the target hazard quotient (THQ) and (iii) modeling the cancer risk using the incremental lifetime cancer risk (ILCR). The study finds that the mean concentrations (±95% CI) and EDI were in the order of Fe > Zn > Cr > Ni > Pb > Co > Cu > Cd. Cancer risk was found to be due to Ni > Cr > Cd > Pb and significantly higher in children than adults. The latter particularly demonstrates the importance of Ni poisoning in the study area. Overall, while essential elements in our beef samples were below WHO limits (hence no health risks), non-essential elements had high health and cancer risks due to higher levels of Cr and Ni.

1 December 2012 in Acta Tropica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EIEmil Ivan
Emil Ivan
NCNigel Crowther
Nigel Crowther
ARAniceth T. Rucogoza
Aniceth T. Rucogoza
LOLawrence, Obado Osuwat
Lawrence, Obado Osuwat
EMElizaphane Munyazesa
Elizaphane Munyazesa
MGMartin P. Grobusch
Martin P. Grobusch

12 March 2021 in Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Keneth Iceland KasoziKeneth Iceland Kasozi
Keneth Iceland Kasozi
Anne LaudisoitAnne Laudisoit
Anne Laudisoit
LOLawrence, Obado Osuwat
Lawrence, Obado Osuwat
Gaber El-Saber BatihaGaber El-Saber Batiha
Gaber El-Saber Batiha
NONaif E. Al Omairi
Naif E. Al Omairi
Keneth Iceland KasoziKeneth Iceland Kasozi
Keneth Iceland Kasozi
Background—misinformation and mistrust often undermines community vaccine uptake, yet information in rural communities, especially of developing countries, is scarce. This study aimed to identify major challenges associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine clinical trials among healthcare workers and staff in Uganda. Methods—a rapid exploratory survey was conducted over 5 weeks among 260 respondents (66% male) from healthcare centers across the country using an online questionnaire. Twenty-seven questions assessed knowledge, confidence, and trust scores on COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials from participants in 46 districts in Uganda. Results—we found low levels of knowledge (i.e., confusing COVID-19 with Ebola) with males being more informed than females (OR = 1.5, 95% CI: 0.7–3.0), and mistrust associated with policy decisions to promote herbal treatments in Uganda and the rushed international clinical trials, highlighting challenges for the upcoming Oxford–AstraZeneca vaccinations. Knowledge, confidence and trust scores were higher among the least educated (certificate vs. bachelor degree holders). We also found a high level of skepticism and possible community resistance to DNA recombinant vaccines, such as the Oxford–AstraZeneca vaccine. Preference for herbal treatments (38/260; 14.6%, 95% CI: 10.7–19.3) currently being promoted by the Ugandan government raises major policy concerns. High fear and mistrust for COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials was more common among wealthier participants and more affluent regions of the country. Conclusion—our study found that knowledge, confidence, and trust in COVID-19 vaccines was low among healthcare workers in Uganda, especially those with higher wealth and educational status. There is a need to increase transparency and inclusive participation to address these issues before new trials of COVID-19 vaccines are initiated.