Vyacheslav V. Gordeev

Dr. Vyacheslav V. Gordeev

P.P. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 117997 Moscow, Russia

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 March 2022 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SZScott Zolkos
Scott Zolkos
AZAlexander V. Zhulidov
Alexander V. Zhulidov
TGTatiana Yu. Gurtovaya
Tatiana Yu. Gurtovaya
Vyacheslav V. GordeevVyacheslav V. Gordeev
Vyacheslav V. Gordeev
SBSergey Vladimorovich Berdnikov
Sergey Vladimorovich Berdnikov
RHRobert M. Holmes
Robert M. Holmes
Significance: Russian rivers are the predominant source of riverine mercury to the Arctic Ocean, where methylmercury biomagnifies to high levels in food webs. Pollution controls are thought to have decreased late–20th-century mercury loading to Arctic watersheds, but there are no published long-term observations on mercury in Russian rivers. Here, we present a unique hydrochemistry dataset to determine trends in Russian river particulate mercury concentrations and fluxes in recent decades. Using hydrologic and mercury deposition modeling together with multivariate time series analysis, we determine that 70 to 90% declines in particulate mercury fluxes were driven by pollution reductions and sedimentation in reservoirs. Results suggest that Russian rivers likely dominated over all other sources of mercury to the Arctic Ocean until recently.

25 November 2010 in Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MLMaría Luisa Leal-Acosta
María Luisa Leal-Acosta
ESEvgueni Shumilin
Evgueni Shumilin
NMNicolai Mirlean
Nicolai Mirlean
DSDmitry Sapozhnikov
Dmitry Sapozhnikov
Vyacheslav V. GordeevVyacheslav V. Gordeev
Vyacheslav V. Gordeev

17 January 2024 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Vyacheslav V. GordeevVyacheslav V. Gordeev
Vyacheslav V. Gordeev
Oleg PokrovskyOleg Pokrovsky
Oleg Pokrovsky
AZAlexander V. Zhulidov
Alexander V. Zhulidov
AFAlexander Filippov
Alexander Filippov
TGTatiana Y. Gurtovaya
Tatiana Y. Gurtovaya
STSuzanne E. Tank
Suzanne E. Tank
In contrast to fairly good knowledge of dissolved carbon and major elements in great Arctic rivers, seasonally resolved concentrations of many trace elements remain poorly characterized, hindering assessment of the current status and possible future changes in the hydrochemistry of the Eurasian Arctic. To fill this gap, here we present results for a broad suite of trace elements in the largest rivers of the Russian Arctic (Ob, Yenisey, Lena, and Kolyma). For context, we also present results for major elements that are more routinely measured in these rivers. Water samples for this study were collected during an international campaign called PARTNERS from 2004 through 2006. A comparison of element concentrations obtained for Arctic rivers in this study with average concentrations in the world’s rivers shows that most elements in the Arctic rivers are similar to or significantly lower than the world average. The mineral content of the three greatest rivers (Ob, Yenisey, and Lena) varies within a narrow range (from 107 mg/L for Yenisey to 123 mg/L for Ob). The Kolyma’s mineral content is significantly lower (52.4 mg/L). Fluxes of all major and trace elements were calculated using average concentrations and average water discharge for the 2004–2006 period. Based on these flux estimates, specific export (i.e., t/km2/y) for most of the elements was greatest for the Lena, followed by the Yenisey, Ob, and Kolyma in decreasing order. Element pairwise correlation analysis identified several distinct groups of elements depending on their sources and relative mobility in the river water. There was a negative correlation between Fe and DOC concentration in the Ob River, which could be linked to different sources of these components in this river. The annual yields of major and trace elements calculated for each river were generally consistent with values assessed for other mid-size and small rivers of the Eurasian subarctic.

1 December 2002 in Regional Environmental Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Vyacheslav V. GordeevVyacheslav V. Gordeev
Vyacheslav V. Gordeev

1 November 2021 in Oceanology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Vyacheslav V. GordeevVyacheslav V. Gordeev
Vyacheslav V. Gordeev
AKA. I. Kochenkova
A. I. Kochenkova
DSD. P. Starodymova
D. P. Starodymova
VSV. P. Shevchenko
V. P. Shevchenko
SBS. K. Belorukov
S. K. Belorukov
OPO. S. Pokrovsky
O. S. Pokrovsky
The results of continuous four-year-long investigations (from May 2015 to April 2019) of the elemental composition of water and suspended matter in the Northern Dvina River are given. Water was sampled every month at two sites in the lower reaches of the river. More than 50 major and trace elements are determined in water filtered through Nuclepore filters and in suspended matter on the filters. The methods of inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and atomic absorption spectrophotometry were used. In contrast to most similar publications previously, the mean concentrations of elements weighted to water discharge (dissolved forms) and to suspended matter discharge (suspended forms) are obtained, which enables us to consider them as the closest to reality. Comparison with the mean concentrations in world rivers shows that the Corg and Fe concentrations in the water of the Northern Dvina River exceed them by 3–5 times. This is related to natural factors, primarily to specific features of the catchment basin (widely spread bogs). The presence or absence of correlation between trace elements and organoferric colloids significantly affects their concentration. The content of elements in the suspended matter of the river is similar to the mean global level, except for Corg and P. We calculate the discharges of dissolved and suspended elements for every year of research and the mean for the four-year period.

12 December 2022 in Minerals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Vyacheslav V. GordeevVyacheslav V. Gordeev
Vyacheslav V. Gordeev
ODOlga M. Dara
Olga M. Dara
AFAlexander Filippov
Alexander Filippov
SBSergey K. Belorukov
Sergey K. Belorukov
ALAleksey S. Lokhov
Aleksey S. Lokhov
AKAnastasya I. Kochenkova
Anastasya I. Kochenkova
This paper seeks to generalize the data obtained over 4 years of investigation of the suspended sediment mineral composition in Severnaya Dvina River. The sampling of the river water to isolate suspended particulate matter (SPM) using the method of sedimentation from large water volumes (200–800 L) was carried out at two points of the delta with different hydrological regimes every month for four years. SPM samples weighing 1 g and more allowed us to obtain and preserve for different analytical procedures the grain size fractions from 1.0–0.5 to <0.001 mm (from sands to pelit). The analyses of fractions revealed a sharp prevalence of pelitic fractions (<0.01 mm) (near 90% on average), while the share of silt was 4%–5%. Coarse fractions were found in the SPM of the main stream of the river but were absent in the samples taken at the point near the river–sea boundary. The determinations of clastic, clay, and some other minerals using the method of X-ray diffraction analysis have shown that in the group of clastic minerals, quartz and plagioclase prevail. Among the clay minerals, smectite and illite were present in high quantities, and chlorite and kaolinite were in lower quantitative. The distribution of minerals in the grain size fractions showed that the sum of clastic minerals reached its highest content of up to 84% in silt fractions (0.05–0.01 mm), while the sum of clay minerals in this fraction was minimal (about 15%). Investigations of seasonal variations of clastic and clay minerals during the whole period showed that the contents of minerals in the SPM of the Severnaya Dvina did not change much over the year. As a result of this work, the following trend was established on the behavior of all kinds of minerals: during the periods of high water in spring and autumn, a slightly increased quantity of clastic minerals was detected in comparison to winter and summer, while the variations in the quantities of clay minerals were insignificant.