To date, lateral differences of invasive breast cancer (IBrC) with respect to the angiogenic and hemostatic profiles were never studied. Here, we aimed to determine the relationship of tumor laterality with various clinical and pathological parameters including angiogenic and hemostatic profiles. A total of 92 women that were initially non-metastatic and treated by surgery were included in this single-center prospective study. Patients were grouped according to tumor localization. A four-year follow-up was accomplished in all patients with a 15.22% recurrence rate. An immunoassay of selected angiogenic and hemostatic parameters, as well as immunohistochemistry of estrogen and progesterone receptors, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and Ki67, was comparatively performed in groups with right- and left-sided IBrC. The same analysis was carried out in a subgroup of patients with luminal A molecular subtype of cancer. Patients with right-sided tumors free of nodal involvement had a significantly longer overall survival compared to their left-sided counterparts (p = 0.0491). Additionally, right-sided tumors had a higher predisposition to be a luminal-A subtype of IBrC (p = 0.0016). Furthermore, 10% of left-sided tumors exhibited an overexpression of HER2, while only 2% patients suffering right-sided tumors displayed a positive score (p = 0.0357). Our findings revealed a significantly higher concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A (p = 0.0136), lower anti-angiogenic ratios (sVEGFR1/VEGF-A (p = 0.0208) and sVEGFR2/VEGF-A (p = 0.0068)), and elevated plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) (p = 0.0229) in patients with breast cancer localized in the left breast, regardless of the molecular subtype of IBrC. Our study showed that left-sided breast tumors without lymph node metastases demonstrate worse overall survival. Laterality of IBrC is associated with pro-angiogenic and pro-thrombotic conditions. We propose to consider laterality as a prognostic factor of IBrC.

(1) Background: Tumour angiogenesis is critical for the progression of neoplasms. A prospective study was designed to examine the utility of stromal cell-derived factor 1α (SDF-1α) and selected vasculo-angiogenic parameters for estimating the probability of disease relapse in 84 primary, operable invasive breast cancer (IBrC) patients (40 (48%) with stage IA and 44 (52%) with stage IIA and IIB). (2) Methods: We explored the prognostic value of the plasma levels of SDF-1α, vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), the soluble forms of VEGF receptors type 1 and 2, and the number of circulating endothelial progenitor cells (circulating EPCs) in breast cancer patients. The median follow-up duration was 58 months, with complete follow-up for the first event. (3) Results: According to ROC curve analysis, the optimal cut-off point for SDF-1α (for discriminating between patients at high and low risk of relapse) was 42 pg/mL, providing 57% sensitivity and 75% specificity. Kaplan–Meier curves for disease-free survival (DFS) showed that concentrations of SDF-1α lower than 42 pg/dL together with a VEGFR1 lower than 29.86 pg/mL were significantly associated with shorter DFS in IBrC patients (p = 0.0381). Patients with both SDF-1α lower than 42 pg/dL and a number of circulating EPCs lower than 9.68 cells/µL had significantly shorter DFS (p = 0.0138). (4) Conclusions: Our results imply the clinical usefulness of SDF-1α, sVEGFR1 and the number of circulating EPCs as prognostic markers for breast cancer in clinical settings.

Background: The main aim of our study involves the analysis of reasons and risk factors for perioperative treatment discontinuation in patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids (UFs) who were qualified for magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) and in whom the procedure was discontinued. Methods: The presented research included 372 women who were primarily eligible for MR-HIFU, but the procedure was interrupted. The reasons and risk factors for treatment discontinuation were analyzed. A statistical comparison of two cohorts (patients in whom the treatment was discontinued and completed) was conducted based on epidemiological factors, UF characteristics and the implementation of uterotonics. Results: The mean discontinuation rate was 18.28% (n = 68). The main reason was the malposition of the intestines (52.94% of all cases). The thermoablation of subserosal UFs was a statistically significant risk factor of perioperative treatment discontinuation (OR 4.62, CI 95% 2.04–10.56), while the therapy of intramural UFs considerably decreased the risk (OR 0.21, CI 95% 0.08–0.51). The volume of the targeted UF was negatively correlated with the risk of discontinuation (OR 0.991, CI 95% 0.986–0.996). Augmentation with oxytocin, but not misoprostol, during the procedure significantly decreased the risk of potential discontinuation (OR 0.15, CI 95% 0.045–0.387, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Although the discontinuation rate seems to be relatively low, further prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm our results. The establishment of particular eligibility criteria for the treatment is a crucial issue in this area. Resigning from the procedure in cases at a high risk of discontinuation might increase patient safety and shorten the time to introduce the most appropriate therapy.

Despite the advancements in breast cancer (BrC) diagnosis and treatment, a considerable proportion of patients with early-stage disease still experience local recurrence or metastasis. This study aimed to assess the levels of specific angiogenic parameters in the EDTA plasma of BrC patients before and after treatment and to explore their clinical and prognostic significance. The levels of vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), soluble form of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor type 1 (sVEGFR1), and soluble form of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor type 2 (sVEGFR2) were measured in 84 early BrC patients, both prior to surgery and within a median time of nine months post-treatment. Prognostic significance was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression analyses. Linear regression models were employed to examine the independent impact of selected angiogenic factors on DFS in breast cancer patients. The results of uni- and multivariate analyses indicated that a pre-treatment concentration of sVEGFR1 above 30.99 pg/mL was associated with improved disease-free survival (DFS) (p < 0.0001 for both analyses), while a pre-treatment concentration of sVEGFR2 above 9475.67 pg/mL was associated with an increased risk of BrC relapse (p < 0.0001 for both analyses). Additionally, a post-treatment concentration of sVEGFR2 above 7361.71 pg/mL was associated with better overall survival (OS) based on the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (p = 0.0141). Furthermore, linear regression models revealed a significant inverse association between pre-treatment levels of sVEGFR1 and the risk of relapse (standardized β −0.2578, p = 0.0499) and a significant positive association of VEGF-A levels with the risk of recurrence (standardized β 0.2958, p = 0.0308). In conclusion, the findings suggest that both pre- and post-treatment levels of sVEGFR1 and sVEGFR2 may hold promise as potential prognostic markers for BrC patients.